Lung Cancer, Open Thoracotomy Surgery, Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Video-assisted Thoracis Surgery (VATS)
Conditions
Keywords
Robotic surgery, Lung cancer, Early stage, Quality of life, Post-operative pain
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to compare quality of life and early and late post-operative pain after anatomical lung resection (lobectomy or segmentectomy) performed by a robotic approach compared to the videothoracoscopic approach (VATS) and the thoracotomic approach antero-lateral in patients with early stage lung cancer.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
: * known or suspected lung cancer clinical stage T1-T2; * N0-N1 candidates for surgery lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy; * ASA-1-2-3; * not severe heart disease; * no alcohol; * no renal impairment (creatinine \<2); * not obese (BMI \<30); * no evidence of other serious comorbidities in the opinion of the investigator.
Exclusion criteria
* severe heart disease; * renal impairment (creatinine \>2.5); * evidence of any serious comorbidities according to the investigator; * malignant tumor in the previous 2 years; * previous chest surgery.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of quality of life by EORTC QOL-CC30. | 01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020 | The sample size is calculated on the primary end point which is the prospective evaluation of quality of life (QoL) evolution after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection versus videothoracoscopic resection versus open thoracotomy, with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire-C30 and the lung cancer-specific module, LC-13. 51 patients operated in each group will provide 80% power to detect a 8-point difference in mean QLQ-C30 Pain score between any two study groups, at the 5% level of significance assuming a coefficient of variability of 0.5 and using a two-sided two-sample t-test. The scale parameters range are included from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of postoperative pain by daily evaluation with visual numeric scale before and after surgery until discharge and at 1, 6 and 12 months | 01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020 | Pain assessment will be recorded daily starting from the pre-operative day and post-operatively until discharge and subsequently at 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery with numerical scale from 0 to 10 (ENV pain score); via questionnaire Brief Pain Inventory. A value of ENV ≤3 will be attributed to adequate analgesia; ENV a score of 4 to 6 will be considered inadequate analgesia with administration of analgesia as needed; ENV score ≥7 will be considered poor analgesia. |
| Intraoperative complications | 01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020 | Conversion rate, defined as procedures that start with minimally invasive access and are converted to open surgery due to different reasons (bleeding, anatomical reasons, oncological reasons, technical reasons, other). |
| Postoperative complications | 01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020 | Surgical complications, higher or equal grade II assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale, within 90 days. |
| Disease free survival at 24 months | 01/04/2016 - 01/12/2020 | Disease free survival will be explored with survival analysis. The time will be calculated from the surgery data to the first recurrence date or to last contact date for all the patients free of disease at the end of surgery. Difference between groups will be explored with log-rank test. |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed