Skip to content

Examination of the Relationship Between Foot - Body Posture and Balance and Gait in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Examination of the Relationship Between Foot - Body Posture and Balance and Gait in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04353167
Enrollment
38
Registered
2020-04-20
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2022-06-15
Last updated
2022-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance, Body Posture, Foot Posture, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

Brief summary

Foot and body postures of patients with DMD will be evaluated. Foot structure characteristics such as foot length, metatarsal width, calcaneal valgus angle will be calculated for the foot posture. Also, the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scale will be used. The body posture will be evaluated with the New York Posture Scale. Many gait characteristics such as step length, cadence, support surface of the patients will be determined with GaitRite instrumented walkway. Patients' balance assessment will be evaluated with Bertec Balance Advantage. The statistical analysis method will determine the relationship between foot and body posture and gait and balance.

Interventions

OTHERobservational evaluation

Patients will be evaluated only observationally without intervention

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
5 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. To be between 5-13 years old 2. Being at level I or II according to Brooke Lower Extremity Functional Classification Scale 3. In the balance assessment, there should be at least 90 degrees of joint range of motion in the ankle to provide base contact on the force platform. 4. Agree to participate in the research voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

1. Having serious mental and psychological problems, 2. Failure to cooperate adequately with the physiotherapist making the evaluations, 3. Severe contracture in lower extremities, 4. Any injury and / or surgery of the lower extremities in the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait instrumented walkway (GaitRite)10 minutesThe GAITRite® system mat was positioned on the floor and connected to a laptop computer, with a 2 m acceleration/deceleration walkway at either end. Subjects were asked to walk at their typical speed to the designated end of the walkway.
Bertec Balance System (Bertec)10 minutesThe system consists of a 20 × 20-inch platform at ground level connected to a laptop computer. The balance plate detects body sway based on the pressure that the subject's feet apply to the plate surface. For testing, each subject stood for 10 seconds under 4 different testing conditions. The first two conditions were eyes open and eyes closed on the balance plate itself, defined as normal stability - eyes open (NSEO) and normal stability - eyes closed (NSEC). These were followed by the patient standing on a 4-inch thick foam rubber pad while on the balance plate. These were labeled as perturbed stability - eyes open (PSEO) and perturbed stability - eyes closed (PSEC). The primary measure assessed by the balance plate for each condition was maximum center of pressure excursion or COP (a distance measured in inches of the major axis of an ellipse calculated along the axis of maximum excursion).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot Posture Index - 610 minutesThe Foot Posture Index - 6 (FPI-6) was evaluated with each child standing and using the original protocol. FPI-6 values ranged from -2 to +2 for each of the six criteria and from -12 to +12 for the total score, indicative of position of each foot along the supinated to pronated continuum of foot posture.
NewYork Posture Scale10 minutesThe assessment of posture was done by New York Posture Rating Scale in which subjects were asked to stand in position of comfort and look forward on the wall at their eye level in order to establish a level head position. Then the plumb line was kept slightly anterior to right malleolus for assessing posture in sagittal plane and at midpoint between the feet for assessing in the frontal plane. Scoring is done as 5, 3, 1 for no deviation, some deviation and marked deviation respectively for each 13 criteria in the rating scale of which components are head, shoulder, spine, hip, feet, arches in the frontal plane and head, chest, shoulder, upper back, trunk, abdomen and low back in the sagittal plane.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026