Skip to content

High-flow Nasal Cannula and Exercise Tolerance in COPD

Acute Effects of High-flow Nasal Cannula and Non-invasive Ventilation on Constant-load Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04350970
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-04-17
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2018-12-20
Last updated
2020-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, Rehabilitation, Exercise

Keywords

COPD, High flow nasal therapy, Non-invasive ventilation

Brief summary

Patients with COPD are often unable to sustain a sufficient workload during exercise. The use of external strategies to improve exercise tolerance, such as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) have been used. The objective was to evaluate and compare the acute effects of HFNT and NIV during exercise on cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea, exercise tolerance and comfort in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Detailed description

The patients underwent an initial clinical examination, with anthropometric evaluation, blood gas analysis, pulmonary function tests and measurement of maximum respiratory pressures. The exercise protocol started in the sector of Ergometry and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. After completing the maximum incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test, two additional visits were scheduled for the three constant load tests. All patients studied underwent an evaluation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). During maximum-incremental CPET, breath by breath: oxygen consumption (V̇O2, mL/min), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2, mL/min), respiratory exchange rate (RER), minute ventilation VE (L/min), respiratory rate (bpm), equivalent ventilation for O2 and CO2 (V̇E/V̇O2 and V̇E/V̇CO2). In addition, cardiac monitoring was performed by 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) throughout the procedure. On the day of the experiment, the patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the previously determined peak, separated by an interval of at least 1 hour. The NIV parameters were adjusted for each patient with Trilogy 100 (Philips™). Spontaneous ventilation mode was set before the protocol for all patients, and a previous period of NIV adaptation was performed to titrate the inspiratory and expiratory pressures. The adaptation period started with the minimum Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP) value of 15cmH2O, and, every 2 minutes, increasing the pressure every 2 cmH2O according to the patient's tolerance.16 The Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) was programmed to vary between 4 and 6 cmH2O. Before the start of the examination, an adaptation was performed with the selected mask and initial ventilator settings for 20 min. No additional oxygen was offered. The high flow system used was Optiflow® (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand). Before the test, flow titration was performed for the patient, which started with the administration of a minimum gas flow of 30L/min and, every 2 minutes, the flow was increased by 5L/min according to patient tolerance. The test only started after 20 minutes of adaptation.

Interventions

All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The high flow nasal therapy was used during all exercise test.

OTHERNon-invasive ventilation

All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The NIV was used during all exercise test.

OTHERControl

All patients underwent two cardiopulmonary exercises with constant-load at 90% of the peak workload. The control test was performed with no additional therapy.

Sponsors

Marcelo Alcantara Holanda
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

One single COPD group performed 3 differents tests, Control exercise, VNI exercise and HFNT exercise on different days.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previous COPD * FEV1 ≤ 50% * Optimized medication

Exclusion criteria

* COPD Exacerbation * Cardiac disease * Previous neurologic disorders * Unable to complete all protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise dinamic hyperinflationone week after all testsTo determine the dinamic hyperinflation during exercise test with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. During all testes the dinamic hyperinflation will be measured by inspiratory capacity (at rest and at the end o exercise test) and will be demonstrated as porcentage os maximum.
Exercise Toleranceone week after all testsTo determine the exercise tolerance with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. Time of exercise test will be measured to determine which test could be the best for COPD patients. In additional, the workload will (treadmill inclination and speed) be check to show which intervention has the better response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dyspneaone week after all testsTo determine the dyspnea during exercise test with 3-different situations , Control, NIV and HFNT. After all situations, Borg scale will be performed to check the dyspnea score at the end of exercise.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026