Skip to content

A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of PF-06462700 in Japanese Participants With Aplastic Anemia

A MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-06462700 ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUSLY AT 40 MG/KG/DAY FOR 4 DAYS IN JAPANESE PARTICIPANTS WITH MODERATE AND ABOVE APLASTIC ANEMIA

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04350606
Enrollment
3
Registered
2020-04-17
Start date
2020-07-25
Completion date
2021-04-19
Last updated
2022-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aplastic Anemia

Keywords

Aplastic Anemia, globulin, ATG, Anti-human Thymocyte Immunogloblin

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-06462700 administered intravenously at 40 mg/kg/day for 4 days in Japanese participants with moderate and above aplastic anemia for making an approval application in Japan.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPF-06462700

PF-06462700 is classified as an immunosuppressant/ immunosuppressive agent. It is the purified, concentrated, and sterile gamma globulin, primarily monomeric immunoglobulin G (IgG), from hyperimmune serum of horses that are immunized with human thymus lymphocytes.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female participants between the ages of 2 years and more, inclusive, at Visit 1 (Screening). * Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, lifestyle considerations, and other study procedures. * Have a clinical diagnosis of aplastic anemia by bone marrow aspiration/biopsy findings and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) etc. * Must meet the following criteria of moderate and above aplastic anemia * Capable of giving signed informed consent/assent as described in Appendix 1, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent document (ICD)/assent document and in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Eligible and willing to have a sibling allogeneic stem cell transplantation. * Evidence of a myelodysplastic syndrome (except for refractory cytopenia in children), as well as other primitive marrow disease. * History or clinical suspicion of congenital aplastic anemia (Fanconi anemia, Congenital keratosis, etc). * History of malignant tumors with active disease within 5 years from study participation. * Participants who are clearly infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). * Pregnant or breast-feeding participants. * Participants with severe hepatic, renal or cardiac failure, or any other life-threatening concurrent \[aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or total bilirubin values \>5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), and/or creatinine value \>2 × ULN\]. * Participants with hypersensitivity such as shock after skin test of this study drug. * Participants with uncontrolled severe infection (pneumonia, sepsis, etc). * Participants who received live vaccine or live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. * Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study. * Prior immunosuppressive therapy with lymphocyte-depleting agents/therapies, including both non-B-cell selective and B-cell-depleting agents (e.g., alefacept, alemtuzumab, rituximab). However, participants previously treated with rATG may enroll. * Previous history of stem cell transplantation. * Previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days (or as determined by the local requirement) or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of investigational product used in this study (whichever is longer). * Baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) that demonstrates clinically relevant abnormalities that may affect participant safety or interpretation of study results (e.g., baseline corrected QT \[QTc\] interval \>450 msec, complete left bundle branch block \[LBBB\], signs of an acute or indeterminate-age myocardial infarction, ST-T interval changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia, second- or third-degree atrioventricular \[AV\] block, or serious bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias). If the baseline uncorrected QT interval is \>450 msec, this interval should be rate-corrected using the Fridericia method and the resulting QTcF should be used for decision making and reporting. If QTc exceeds 450 msec, or QRS exceeds 120 msec, the ECG should be repeated 2 more times and the average of the 3 QTc or QRS values should be used to determine the participant's eligibility. Computer-interpreted ECGs should be overread by a physician experienced in reading ECGs before excluding participants. * Investigator site staff members directly involved in the conduct of the study and their family members, site staff members otherwise supervised by the investigator, or Pfizer employees, including their family members, directly involved in the conduct of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 12Week 12 Follow-up VisitHematologic response was considered to be effective when 2 or more of the following criteria were met: absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to (\>=) 500 per microliters, platelet count \>=20,000 per microliters and reticulocyte count \>=60,000 per microliters was observed. In this outcome measure, number of participants with hematologic response classified as effective and not effective were reported. Improvement in counts that were dependent upon exogenously administered growth factors or transfusion, was not considered as fulfilling response criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reticulocyte Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24
Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 24Week 24 Follow-up VisitHematologic response was considered to be effective when 2 or more of the following criteria were met: absolute neutrophil count \>=500 per microliters, platelet count \>=20,000 per microliters and reticulocyte count \>=60,000 per microliters was observed. In this outcome measure, number of participants with hematologic response classified as effective and not effective were reported. Improvement in counts that were dependent upon exogenously administered growth factors or transfusion, was not been considered as fulfilling response criteria.
Platelet Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24
Number of Participants Who Survived During the StudyScreening (up to 28 days prior to Day 1 of treatment) up to 24 weeks of follow-up (approximately up to 28 weeks)In this outcome measure, number of participants who survived during the study were observed.
Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Transfusion Independence: Day 1 of Treatment up to Week 12 Follow-up Visit (approximately 12 weeks); Week 24 Transfusion Independence: Day after Week 12 Follow-up visit to Week 24 Follow-up Visit (approximately 12 weeks)Transfusion independence at Week 12 was defined as when participants did not have any transfusion records from the time of the first dose of the investigational product at Day 1 to the day of Week 12 follow-up visit (inclusive). Transfusion independence at Week 24 was defined as when participants did not have any transfusion records from the day after Week 12 follow-up visit to the day of Week 24 follow-up visit (inclusive).
Absolute Neutrophil Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Total 3 participants signed the inform consent form (ICF). Out of which 0 participants were screen failures, 3 actually enrolled into the study and assigned to a study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PF-06462700
Participants aged 2 years or \>2 years with moderate and above severity aplastic anemia received PF-06462700 at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day, IV for 4 days. Participants after treatment were followed up for 24 weeks.
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPF-06462700
Age, Continuous29.67 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.56
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 12

Hematologic response was considered to be effective when 2 or more of the following criteria were met: absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to (\>=) 500 per microliters, platelet count \>=20,000 per microliters and reticulocyte count \>=60,000 per microliters was observed. In this outcome measure, number of participants with hematologic response classified as effective and not effective were reported. Improvement in counts that were dependent upon exogenously administered growth factors or transfusion, was not considered as fulfilling response criteria.

Time frame: Week 12 Follow-up Visit

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included participants were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 12Effective2 Participants
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 12Not Effective1 Participants
Secondary

Absolute Neutrophil Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Time frame: Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-06462700Absolute Neutrophil Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24NA Neutrophil cells per microliter
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Survived During the Study

In this outcome measure, number of participants who survived during the study were observed.

Time frame: Screening (up to 28 days prior to Day 1 of treatment) up to 24 weeks of follow-up (approximately up to 28 weeks)

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06462700Number of Participants Who Survived During the Study3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 24

Hematologic response was considered to be effective when 2 or more of the following criteria were met: absolute neutrophil count \>=500 per microliters, platelet count \>=20,000 per microliters and reticulocyte count \>=60,000 per microliters was observed. In this outcome measure, number of participants with hematologic response classified as effective and not effective were reported. Improvement in counts that were dependent upon exogenously administered growth factors or transfusion, was not been considered as fulfilling response criteria.

Time frame: Week 24 Follow-up Visit

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 24Effective2 Participants
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Hematologic Response at Week 24Not Effective1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence at Weeks 12 and 24

Transfusion independence at Week 12 was defined as when participants did not have any transfusion records from the time of the first dose of the investigational product at Day 1 to the day of Week 12 follow-up visit (inclusive). Transfusion independence at Week 24 was defined as when participants did not have any transfusion records from the day after Week 12 follow-up visit to the day of Week 24 follow-up visit (inclusive).

Time frame: Week 12 Transfusion Independence: Day 1 of Treatment up to Week 12 Follow-up Visit (approximately 12 weeks); Week 24 Transfusion Independence: Day after Week 12 Follow-up visit to Week 24 Follow-up Visit (approximately 12 weeks)

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 Transfusion Independence0 Participants
PF-06462700Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 Transfusion Independence2 Participants
Secondary

Platelet Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Time frame: Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-06462700Platelet Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24NA Platelet cells per microliter
Secondary

Reticulocyte Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Time frame: Treatment: Day 4; Follow-up: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24

Population: FAS included participants who were assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PF-06462700Reticulocyte Count at Day 4, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24NA Reticulocyte cells per microliter

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026