Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
CC-90011, Nivolumab, Advanced Cancers, Small cell lung cancer, Squamous non-small cell lung cancer, LSD1 inhibitor
Brief summary
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort study to assess safety and efficacy of CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab in subjects with small cell lung cancer or squamous non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after 1 or 2 lines of therapies. The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the overall response rate of subjects treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab in three cohorts: * Cohort A: SCLC in ICI naïve subjects * Cohort B: SCLC in ICI progressor subjects * Cohort C: sqNSCLC in ICI progressor subjects Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects in the treated population who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. In Cohort A, expected ORR for nivolumab monotherapy is 14% while target ORR is 30%. To achieve at least 80% power with one-sided type 1 error 0.1, 39 subjects will be enrolled according to a 2-stage group sequential design based on a binomial test. In stage 1, 12 subjects will be enrolled and treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab. If there are 2 or more subjects responding, Cohort A will continue to enroll an additional 27 subjects. If 1 or less subjects respond in stage 1, Cohort A will stop for futility. In Cohort B and C, expected ORR for nivolumab monotherapy is 5% while target ORR is 15%. To achieve at least 80% power with one-sided type 1 error 0.1, 48 subjects will be enrolled according to a 2-stage group sequential design based on a binomial test. In stage 1, 14 subjects will be enrolled and treated with CC-90011 in combination with nivolumab. If there are 1 or more subjects responding, Cohort B and C will continue to enroll an additional 34 subjects each. If 0 subjects respond in stage 1, Cohort B and C will stop for futility.
Interventions
DRUGCC-90011
CC-90011
DRUGNivolumab
Nivolumab
Sponsors
Celgene
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF). 2. Subject with histological or cytological confirmation of extensive stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES SCLC) or Stage IIIb or IV squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (sqNSCLC) 3. Subject has received 1 or 2 prior lines of therapies, defined as: 1. Cohort A (SCLC, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor naïve): * At least 1 prior treatment including a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet * A minimum of 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in first line treatment, unless stopped at 2 cycles due to treatment-related toxicity 2. Cohort B (SCLC, ICI progressors): * At least 1 prior first or second line treatment includes an ICI * If treatment includes an ICI as maintenance therapy, at least 1 cycle of ICI in maintenance should have been completed * At least 1 prior treatment including a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet * A minimum of 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without ICI, in first line treatment, unless stopped at 2 cycles due to treatment-related toxicity * Subject must have progressed during ICI therapy, defined as unequivocal progression on or within 3 months of the last dose of ICI therapy (if no subsequent therapy) 3. Cohort C (sqNSCLC, ICI progressors): * At least 1 prior first or second line treatment includes an ICI * If treatment includes an ICI as maintenance therapy, at least 1 cycle of ICI in maintenance should have been completed * At least 1 prior treatment including a platinum-based chemotherapy doublet * A minimum of 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without an ICI, in first line treatment, unless stopped at 2 cycles due to treatment-related toxicity * Subject must have progressed during ICI therapy, defined as unequivocal progression on or within 3 months of the last dose of ICI therapy (if no subsequent therapy) 4. Subject has progressed at the last line of therapy. 5. Subject has a measurable disease defined by RECIST v1.1. 6. Subject agrees to provide a tumor biopsy from primary or metastatic site prior to first dose and at a pre-specified timepoint during treatment. Core biopsy is required however, in the event a core biopsy may not otherwise be feasible in the opinion of the treating physician, an endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirate \[EBUS-FNA\]) biopsy, using the largest gauge needle, may be performed instead. 7. Subject has ECOG Performance Status of 0 to 1. 8. Subject must have the following laboratory values: 1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L 2. Hemoglobin (Hgb) ≥ 9 g/dL (one-time blood transfusion is allowed) 3. Platelet (Plt) Count ≥ 150 x 109/L 4. White blood cells (WBC) ≥ 2 x 109L 5. Serum AST/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) or ALT/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or ≤ 5 x ULN if presence of liver metastases 6. Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN (≤ 3 x ULN, if Gilbert's syndrome or if indirect bilirubin concentrations are suggestive of extrahepatic source of the elevation) 7. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 60 mL/minute based on Cockcroft-Gault or modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) or ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
Exclusion criteria
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment: 1. Subject has not recovered to Grade 2 or lower clinically significant toxicities related to the prior therapy (alopecia excluded). 2. Subject has received prior LSD1 therapies. 3. Subject has a history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to other monoclonal antibodies 4. Subject with symptomatic and untreated or unstable central nervous system (CNS) metastases. 1. Subject has recently been treated with whole brain radiation or stereotactic radiosurgery for CNS metastases must have completed therapy at least 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 and has a follow-up brain computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating either stable or improving metastases 2 or more weeks after completion of radiotherapy. 2. Subject must be asymptomatic and off steroids or on stable dose of steroids for at least 2 weeks (≤ 10 mg daily prednisone or equivalent) prior to first dose. 5. Subject has persistent diarrhea due to a malabsorptive syndrome (such as celiac sprue or inflammatory bowel disease) ≥ NCI CTCAE Grade 2, despite medical management), or any other significant gastrointestinal (GI) disorder that could affect the absorption of the study treatments. 6. Subject with symptomatic or uncontrolled ulcers (gastric or duodenal), particularly those with a history of and/or risk of perforation and GI tract hemorrhages. 7. Subject with any hemorrhage/bleeding event \> NCI CTCAE Grade 2 or haemoptysis \> 1 teaspoon within 4 weeks prior to the first dose. 8. Subject has any of the following cardiovascular criteria: 1. Evidence of acute or ongoing cardiac ischemia 2. Current symptomatic pulmonary embolism 3. Unstable angina pectoris or myocardial infarction ≤ 6 months prior to enrollment 4. Heart failure of New York Heart Association Classification III or IV ≤ 6 months prior to enrollment 5. Persistent or clinically meaningful ventricular arrhythmias prior to enrollment 6. Cerebral vascular accident or transient ischemic attack ≤ 6 months prior to enrollment 7. QT corrected based on Fridericia's equation (QTcF) ≥ 450 milliseconds (msec) on Screening ECG, a baseline prolongation of QTcF interval ≥ 450 msec (NCI CTCAE Grade ≥ 2) 8. A history of additional risk factors for Torsades de pointes (TdP) (eg, heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome) 9. Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 160/95 mm Hg) 9. Subject has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. 10. Subject has known chronic active hepatitis B or C virus (HBV, HCV) infection. 1. Subject who is seropositive due to HBV vaccination is eligible. 2. Subject who has no active viral infection and is under adequate prophylaxis against HBV reactivation is eligible. 11. Subject has any other malignancy within 2 years prior to enrollment, with the exception of adequately treated in-situ bladder cancer, in-situ carcinoma of the cervix, uteri, nonmelanomatous skin cancer, ductal in situ breast carcinoma, thyroid cancer, or early stage prostate cancer (all treatment of which should have been completed 6 months prior to enrollment). 12. Subject has medical conditions requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\> 10 mg daily prednisone or equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of enrollment. 1. A brief (≤ 7 days) course of corticosteroids for prophylaxis (eg, contrast dye allergy) or for treatment of nonautoimmune conditions (eg, delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction caused by contact allergen) is permitted. 2. Adrenal replacement steroid doses \> 10 mg daily prednisone or equivalent are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease. 3. Topical, ocular, intra-articular, intranasal, and inhalational corticosteroids (with minimal systemic absorption) are permitted. 13. Subject has active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse. Subjects with the following diseases are allowed to be enrolled after further screening: type I diabetes, hypothyroidism managed with hormone replacement therapy only, skin diseases not requiring systemic treatment (such as vitiligo, psoriasis, or alopecia), or diseases not expected to recur in the absence of external triggering factors. 14. Subject is pregnant or nursing. 15. Subject has a history of persistent skin rash ≥ NCI CTCAE Grade 2 related to prior ICI therapy. 16. Subject has organ transplant history, including allogeneic stem cell transplant. 17. Subject has interstitial lung disease history. 18. Subject has received a live/attenuated vaccine within 30 days of first dose. 19. Subject has previous SARS-CoV-2 infection either suspected or confirmed within 4 weeks prior to screening. 1. Acute symptoms must have resolved and based on Investigator assessment in consultation with the Medical Monitor, there are no sequelae that would place the subject at a higher risk of receiving investigational treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate | Every 6 weeks post Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) Day 1 for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participants (up to approximately 33 months) | Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in the treated population who had confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 18 (each cycle is of 28 days) | Laboratory results were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening). |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 18 (Each cycle is of 28 days) | Laboratory results were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening). |
| Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication | From first dose till treatment discontinuation due to any reason (Up to approximately 107 weeks) | Concomitant medication is defined as medications that were either initiated before the first dose of study drug and continued during the study treatment, or initiated on/after the date of the first dose of study drug and on/before the date of treatment discontinuation. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight | Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks) | Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks) | Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature | Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks) | Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate | Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks) | Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days) | An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death). |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011 | From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days) | Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011 | From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days) | Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab | From the start of study drug until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days) | Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment. |
| Duration of Response | Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months)) | Duration of Response was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed documented response to the time of the first documented tumor progression, as determined by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD. |
| Time to Response | Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months)) | Time to response was defined as the time from the first dose of the study drug to the date of the first confirmed documented response (CR or PR), as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD. |
| Progression-Free Survival | Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months)) | Progression-Free Survival is the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD. |
| Time to First Subsequent Therapy | From the first dose of study drug to the date of next cancer therapy or death due to any cause (up to approximately 33 months) | Time to First Subsequent Therapy was defined as the time from the first dose of the study drug to the date of the next cancer therapy or death. |
| Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Baseline and up to End of Treatment (107 weeks) | ECOG Scale was used to assess performance status. Grades: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, able to carry out work of light nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out work activities. Up and about more than 50% waking hours. 3: Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% waking hours. 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair. 5: Dead. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline. |
Countries
France, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg Participants with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) naive received capsule of 40 milligram (mg) of CC-90011 orally once in a week in a continuous 28-day cycle. Nivolumab were administered intravenously at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks as a 30 minute or a 60-minute intravenous infusion. | 39 |
| Cohort A 60mg Participants with SCLC and ICI naive received capsule of 60 mg of CC-90011 orally once in a week in a continuous 28-day cycle. Nivolumab were administered intravenously at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks as a 30 minute or a 60-minute intravenous infusion. | 2 |
| Cohort B 40 mg Participants with SCLC and ICI progressor received capsule of 40 mg of CC-90011 orally once in a week in a continuous 28-day cycle. Nivolumab were administered intravenously at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks as a 30 minute or a 60-minute intravenous infusion. | 14 |
| Cohort C Participants with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) and ICI progressor received capsule of 40 mg of CC-90011 orally once in a week in a continuous 28-day cycle. Nivolumab were administered intravenously at a dose of 480 mg every 4 weeks as a 30 minute or a 60-minute intravenous infusion. | 37 |
| Total | 92 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Death | 27 | 2 | 13 | 26 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other reason | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort C | Cohort A 60mg | Cohort B 40 mg | Cohort A 40 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized >= 65 - < 75 years | 15 participants | 0 participants | 3 participants | 16 participants | 34 participants |
| Age, Customized < 65 years | 17 participants | 2 participants | 11 participants | 21 participants | 51 participants |
| Age, Customized >= 75 years | 5 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants | 7 participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 30 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 11 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 9 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 28 Participants | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 33 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 28 Participants | 74 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 29 / 39 | 2 / 2 | 13 / 14 | 32 / 37 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 39 / 39 | 2 / 2 | 14 / 14 | 33 / 35 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 20 / 39 | 2 / 2 | 8 / 14 | 25 / 35 |
Outcome results
Primary
Overall Response Rate
Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in the treated population who had confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD.
Time frame: Every 6 weeks post Cycle 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) Day 1 for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participants (up to approximately 33 months)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Overall Response Rate | 10.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Overall Response Rate | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Overall Response Rate | 0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C | Overall Response Rate | 8.6 percentage of participants |
Secondary
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Participants with DBP and SBP measurements available at the specific timepoint were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Systolic Blood Pressure | -8.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 18.35 |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Diastolic Blood Pressure | -4.9 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 10.84 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Diastolic Blood Pressure | 9.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | — |
| Cohort A 60mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Systolic Blood Pressure | 5.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | — |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Systolic Blood Pressure | 4.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 14.82 |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Diastolic Blood Pressure | -3.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Cohort C | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Systolic Blood Pressure | -11.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 15.19 |
| Cohort C | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Diastolic Blood Pressure | -3.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 9.89 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate
Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Participants with pulse rate measurements available at the specific timepoint were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate | -1.0 beats per minute | Standard Deviation 12.37 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate | -8.0 beats per minute | — |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate | 12.0 beats per minute | Standard Deviation 14.73 |
| Cohort C | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Pulse Rate | 0.4 beats per minute | Standard Deviation 16.58 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature
Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Participants with temperature measurements available at the specific timepoint were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature | 0.01 degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.376 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature | 0.20 degree Celsius | — |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature | 0.03 degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.388 |
| Cohort C | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Temperature | -0.04 degree Celsius | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight
Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enroll and take at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Participants with weight measurements available at the specific timepoint were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight | -1.88 kilogram | Standard Deviation 5.583 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight | -1.00 kilogram | — |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight | -2.58 kilogram | Standard Deviation 5.651 |
| Cohort C | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in Vital Sign - Weight | -4.20 kilogram | Standard Deviation 8.065 |
Secondary
Duration of Response
Duration of Response was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a confirmed documented response to the time of the first documented tumor progression, as determined by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD.
Time frame: Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months))
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Treated Population with confirmed Best Response of CR or PR were included in analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Duration of Response | 645.0 days | Standard Deviation 387.05 |
| Cohort C | Duration of Response | 326.0 days | Standard Deviation 201.14 |
Secondary
Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication
Concomitant medication is defined as medications that were either initiated before the first dose of study drug and continued during the study treatment, or initiated on/after the date of the first dose of study drug and on/before the date of treatment discontinuation.
Time frame: From first dose till treatment discontinuation due to any reason (Up to approximately 107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication | 39 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication | 14 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants Receiving Concomitant Medication | 35 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters
Laboratory results were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening).
Time frame: Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 18 (Each cycle is of 28 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Albumin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Sodium | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alanine Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alanine Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 5 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Calcium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 7 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 8 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 10 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 11 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 16 Potassium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alanine Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 7 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 11 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 5 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 16 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 10 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alanine Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Albumin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 8 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alkaline Phosphatase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 10 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Potassium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Glucose | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 11 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 5 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 7 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 16 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alanine Aminotransferase | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Albumin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 8 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Direct Bilirubin | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alanine Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Glucose | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alanine Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 10 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Direct Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Albumin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alkaline Phosphatase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Calcium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Alkaline Phosphatase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 8 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Alanine Aminotransferase | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Aspartate Aminotransferase | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 5 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 11 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Calcium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Sodium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 4 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 2 Glucose | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 3 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 1 Bilirubin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 6 Sodium | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 14 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 16 Potassium | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 9 Glucose | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Chemistry Parameters | Cycle 7 Direct Bilirubin | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters
Laboratory results were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening).
Time frame: Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 18 (each cycle is of 28 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Lymphocytes | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Hemoglobin | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Platelets | 5 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Platelets | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Neutrophils | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 12 Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Leukocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 4 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 7 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 11 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Neutrophils | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 14 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Lymphocytes | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Lymphocytes | 3 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 7 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Leukocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Platelets | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 14 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 12 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 11 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 4 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Neutrophils | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Neutrophils | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 12 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Leukocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Lymphocytes | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Neutrophils | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 4 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 7 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 11 Lymphocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 14 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Neutrophils | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 5 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 18 Neutrophils | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 10 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 4 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Leukocytes | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 11 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 3 Lymphocytes | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Platelets | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Lymphocytes | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 12 Hemoglobin | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 2 Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Hemoglobin | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 14 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Neutrophils | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 8 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 7 Lymphocytes | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 1 Lymphocytes | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 9 Platelets | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Laboratory Results With CTCAE Toxicity Grade >=3 for Hematology Parameters | Cycle 6 Platelets | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status
ECOG Scale was used to assess performance status. Grades: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, able to carry out work of light nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out work activities. Up and about more than 50% waking hours. 3: Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% waking hours. 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair. 5: Dead. Baseline value was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the day that first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values will be used as the baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and up to End of Treatment (107 weeks)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Participants with ECOG measurements available at the specific timepoint were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 0 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 1 | 17 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 0 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 0 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 0 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 3 to Grade 0 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 5 to Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 4 to Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 1 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Post-Baseline Grade Shift in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance (ECOG) Status | Grade 2 to Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment. AEs were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (Grade 1=mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Death).
Time frame: From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 2 | 14 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 4 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 5 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Missing | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Missing | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Missing | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 5 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 5 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Missing | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Maximal National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) | Grade 3 | 20 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011
Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment.
Time frame: From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011 | 27 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of CC-90011 | 26 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab
Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment.
Time frame: From the start of study drug until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab | 16 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Nivolumab | 14 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011
Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent Adverse Events are defined as any AEs that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of nivolumab study treatment.
Time frame: From the start of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of CC-90011 or until 100 days after last dose of Nivolumab (up to 849 days)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort A 60mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction of CC-90011 | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Progression-Free Survival
Progression-Free Survival is the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD.
Time frame: Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months))
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Progression-Free Survival | 126.4 days | Standard Deviation 190.29 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Progression-Free Survival | 33.5 days | Standard Deviation 7.78 |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Progression-Free Survival | 65.6 days | Standard Deviation 57.23 |
| Cohort C | Progression-Free Survival | 184.9 days | Standard Deviation 202.2 |
Secondary
Time to First Subsequent Therapy
Time to First Subsequent Therapy was defined as the time from the first dose of the study drug to the date of the next cancer therapy or death.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug to the date of next cancer therapy or death due to any cause (up to approximately 33 months)
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Time to First Subsequent Therapy | 181.3 days | Standard Deviation 183.87 |
| Cohort A 60mg | Time to First Subsequent Therapy | 60.0 days | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Cohort B 40 mg | Time to First Subsequent Therapy | 113.3 days | Standard Deviation 111.51 |
| Cohort C | Time to First Subsequent Therapy | 224.1 days | Standard Deviation 203.26 |
Secondary
Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the time from the first dose of the study drug to the date of the first confirmed documented response (CR or PR), as assessed by Investigator review per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Disease progression (PD) is defined as an additional 10% increase in tumor burden with a minimum 5 mm absolute increase from time of initial PD. This includes an increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and/or the diameters of new measurable lesions compared to the time of the initial PD.
Time frame: Every 6 weeks post cycle 1 day 1 (each cycle is of 28 days) for the first 24 weeks and then every 8 weeks until disease progression, new anticancer therapy, death or withdrawal by participant (up to approximately 33 months))
Population: Treated population consist of all participants who enrolled and took at least one dose of either CC-90011 or nivolumab. Treated Population with confirmed best response of CR or PR.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A 40 mg | Time to Response | 82.0 days |
| Cohort C | Time to Response | 79.0 days |