Skip to content

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bladder

Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bladder

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04350359
Acronym
TTNS1yr
Enrollment
111
Registered
2020-04-17
Start date
2020-06-08
Completion date
2026-06-11
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

electric stimulation, SCI, spinal cord injury, neurogenic bladder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if electric stimulation to the leg, called transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), can improve bladder outcomes in acute spinal cord injury.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to see how well TTNS works at preventing incontinence in people with paraplegia from SCI that perform intermittent catheterization to empty their bladder. This study will compare the effectiveness of TTNS at 2 doses, fixed-dose and variable-dose. It will also evaluate the frequency of use, 2 days weekly compared to 5 days weekly. Based on our pilot trials, tibial nerve stimulation protocols use submotor current intensity with a duration of 200 µs and a frequency of 20Hz. The experimental group will use a submotor "variable dose." The fixed-dose group will use submotor at current intensity at 1mA and designated as "fixed-dose." TTNS will be used 5 days weekly, per our pilot trial. At 4-months post-SCI, the subject will be instructed to switch to 2x daily if he or she was randomized into the variable dose group of 2 days weekly and thus continue to doing so for the remainder of study participation. Because there is support in the literature for reduced doses of tibial nerve stimulation required for maintenance (1-3x weekly), the RCT includes this frequency comparison arm. All subjects will continue for 1-year post-SCI. Additionally, we are collecting surveys to help identify characteristics of people (resilience and confidence) and adherence to medication and TTNS use throughout the study.

Interventions

DEVICEVariable-dose TTNS Protocol 5 x week

Electrodes 2 inch by 2 inch will be placed according to anatomic landmarks, with the negative electrode behind the internal malleolus and the positive electrode 10cm superior to the negative electrode, verified with rhythmic flexion of the toes secondary to stimulation of the flexor digitorum and hallicus brevis. The intensity level will be set to the amperage immediately under the threshold for motor contraction. If there is no contraction seen, patients will be excluded. In addition, if the patient perceives pain, the intensity will be lowered until comfortable. Stimulation frequency of 20 Hz and pulse width of 200ms in continuous mode will be used.

DEVICEFixed-dose TTNS Protocol

Toe flexion will be attempted, as in the TTNS protocol. Then the stimulation will be reduced to 1 mA for 30 minutes. This will continue at 5x weekly until 1-year post-injury.

DEVICEVariable-dose TTNS Protocol 2 x week

At the 4 month CMG, subjects initially randomized into the variable dose protocol of 2 x weekly will start doing so for the remainder of the study.

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER
MedStar National Rehabilitation Network
CollaboratorOTHER
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Subjects will be randomized to either Variable or fixed-dose (2:1) using a block size of 6 and stratified based on complete/incomplete SCI to ensure the equal allocation of the most severely injured in the two groups. The PI and investigators will be blinded to randomization and treatment allocation, managed by the research assistant.

Intervention model description

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-75 years old * Traumatic or non-traumatic SCI * Admitted to inpatient rehabilitation within 6 weeks * T9 level of injury and above who are at greatest risk of morbid NGB * Regionally located to allow follow-up * English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion criteria

* History of genitourinary diagnoses (i.e. prostate hypertrophy, overactive bladder, cancer, etc.) * History of central nervous system disorder (i.e. prior SCI, stroke, brain injury, Parkinson's disease, MS, etc.) * History of peripheral neuropathy * pre-SCI symptoms of peripheral neuropathy (numbness and/or tingling in feet, sharp/jabbing/burning pain in feet, sensitivity to touch, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, etc.) * Pregnancy * Known injury to the lumbosacral spinal cord or plexus, or pelvis with associated neuropathy * concern for tibial nerve pathway injury * absence of toe flexion or autonomic dysreflexia during electric stimulation test * Potential for progressive SCI including neurodegenerative SCI, ALS, cancer myelopathy, Multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS)Prior to discharge which could be up to 4 weeks from admission, monthly until 1 year post injury.Changes in Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Scores. The total score can range from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 74 (maximum symptoms) where a lower score indicates a better outcome.
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on frequency of catheterization and voiding volumes2 days at the end of each month for 1 year.Maintaining frequency of catheterization (count per day) and volumes per void (ml per collection)
Maintained bladder capacity as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in mlBaselinewe expect bladder capacity to be maintained in those with effective TTNS
Prolonged sensation with bladder filling as assessed by the Urodynamics study measured in mlBaselineEvidence of TTNS mechanism expected in those with effective TTNS
Change in bladder pathology from baseline presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD as assessed by the urodynamics study at 4 months.Baseline, 4 months, 1 year post SCIReduced bladder pathology (presence of detrusor overactivity and DSD) in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on change in urodynamic studies at baseline and 4-months
Evidence of improved quality of life in those with effective bladder neuromodulation based on Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) surveyAt discharge which could be up to 4 week from admission, 4-months post injury and at 1 year post injury.Comparing I-QOL upon discharge from rehabilitation, 4-months post-injury and 1-year post-injury using incontinence QOL (I-QOL) survey, between and within both arms of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity differences during bladder filling as assessed by high frequency (HF) spectral componentBaseline, 4 months, 1 year post SCI
Change in sympathetic nervous system (SNS)activity differences during bladder filling as assessed by high frequency (HF) spectral componentBaseline, 4 months, 1 year post SCI
Change in diastolic pressure during bladder fillingBaseline, 4 months, 1 year post SCI
Change in systolic pressure during bladder fillingBaseline, 4 months, 1 year post SCI
Number of participants that show episodes of Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD) during bladder fillingBaseline
Number of participants that show episodes of AD during bladder filling4 months

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArgyrios Stampas, MD

UTHealth and TIRR Mermorial Hermann

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSuzanne Groah, MD

MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026