Skip to content

Virtual Human Technology for Patients With Chronic Pain

Virtual Human Technology for Patients With Chronic Pain: Experimental Study of Pain Neuroscience and Emotional Disclosure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04349033
Enrollment
94
Registered
2020-04-16
Start date
2021-02-10
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Brief summary

The experimental study compares three virtual human interviews of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: Emotional disclosure and brain, emotional disclosure only, basic information control. Effects on attitudes and clinical outcomes at 1-month follow-up are assessed.

Detailed description

Emotional disclosure about stressors and other private experiences has been found to be helpful for some people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Also, helping patients understand the role of the brain in pain has been helpful. We have developed a virtual human interviewer to help patients talk about their pain and their lives. We will conduct an experimental study to compare the effects of several different types of VH interviews. Patients with chronic pain will be randomized to receive one of three VH interviews: emotional disclosure and brain education; emotional disclosure alone; or a control basic pain interview. Patients will be assessed at baseline and 1-month follow-up on a range of attitudinal and clinical measures to determine how these different interviews affect outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPain Information Control

Patients are interviewed about their pain history and other basic, non-disclosure information about their health.

BEHAVIORALEmotional Disclosure Only

Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives, but without brain education

BEHAVIORALEmotional Disclosure and Brain Education

Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives (stress, other illnesses, personality, adverse childhood experiences), and these are explored as part of education of the brain's role in their pain.

Sponsors

University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER
Wayne State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic musculoskeletal Pain

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain IntensityChange from Baseline to 1-month follow-upBrief Pain Inventory (average of the 4 pain intensity rating items: highest, lowest, average, now). Range: 0.0 to 10.0 (higher = more severe pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain InterferenceChange from Baseline to 1-month follow-upBrief Pain Inventory (7 interference items; range: 0.0 to 10.0; higher = more interference)
Pain Stages of Change QuestionnaireChange from Baseline to 1-month follow-upPain Stages of Change Questionnaire assesses readiness / motivation to engage in pain self-management. Sum of subscales of Contemplation + Action + Maintenance - Precontemplation; Range = 0 to 12; higher scores = more readiness to change
Pain Catastrophizing ScaleChange from Baseline to 1-month follow-upPain catastrophizing (range: 0.0 to 4.0; higher scores = more catastrophizing)
Emotional DistressChange from Baseline to 1-month follow-upSelf-rating of how depressed, anxious, angry, and guilty participant was during last week on 0 to 4 scale. Ratings averaged; higher means = more distress

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment started on February 10, 2021, and the study concluded on August 1, 2021

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)
Patients are interviewed about stress and other emotional issues and are educated about how emotions and the brain influence pain. Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education: Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives (stress, other illnesses, personality, adverse childhood experiences), and these are explored as part of education of the brain's role in their pain.
29
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)
Patients are interviewed about stress and other emotional issues only. Emotional Disclosure Only: Patients are interviewed about a number of aspects of their lives, but without brain education
34
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)
Patients are interviewed about their pain history and experience. Pain Information Control: Patients are interviewed about their pain history and other basic, non-disclosure information about their health.
31
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEmotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)TotalPain Information Control (Standard Interview)Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)
Age, Continuous50.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.99
51.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
45.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.21
56.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.68
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants76 Participants24 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants94 Participants31 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants82 Participants28 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants12 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 340 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 340 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 340 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Intensity

Brief Pain Inventory (average of the 4 pain intensity rating items: highest, lowest, average, now). Range: 0.0 to 10.0 (higher = more severe pain)

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)Pain Intensity-0.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)Pain Intensity-0.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)Pain Intensity-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Secondary

Emotional Distress

Self-rating of how depressed, anxious, angry, and guilty participant was during last week on 0 to 4 scale. Ratings averaged; higher means = more distress

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)Emotional Distress-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)Emotional Distress-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)Emotional Distress-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

Pain catastrophizing (range: 0.0 to 4.0; higher scores = more catastrophizing)

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)Pain Catastrophizing Scale-0.19 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)Pain Catastrophizing Scale-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)Pain Catastrophizing Scale-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Pain Interference

Brief Pain Inventory (7 interference items; range: 0.0 to 10.0; higher = more interference)

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)Pain Interference-0.82 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)Pain Interference-1.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)Pain Interference-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Secondary

Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire

Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire assesses readiness / motivation to engage in pain self-management. Sum of subscales of Contemplation + Action + Maintenance - Precontemplation; Range = 0 to 12; higher scores = more readiness to change

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Emotional Disclosure and Brain Education (Educational Interview)Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire0.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Emotional Disclosure Only (Psychosocial Interview)Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Pain Information Control (Standard Interview)Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire-0.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026