Skip to content

Propylene Mesh VS Standard Customized Palatal Stent as Protective Mechanical Barrier

Propylene Mesh VS Standard Customized Palatal Stent as Protective Mechanical Barrier Following Harvesting of a Free Palatal Graft: A Short-term Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial (Part 1)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04348279
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-04-16
Start date
2018-04-05
Completion date
2020-05-20
Last updated
2020-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Randomized Controlled Trial, Human Study

Keywords

palatal wound, propylene mesh, palatal protection

Brief summary

protection of the palatal wound is an essential step following harvesting a palatal soft tissue graft. During the last decades, several materials were used to avoid protect against the post-operative problems as bleeding, pain and possible infections. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the usage of polypropylene mesh, compared to the conventional custom-made acrylic stent for efficacy in protection of the palatal wound and reducing the bleeding tendency and post-operative pain. propylene mesh is a promising material for protection of the palatal wound due to its light weight, limited bacterial wicking, tissue compatible properties, however, the custom made acrylic palatal stent provides a more precise mechanical . More studies are required to deeply assess the benefits of this material in the periodontal plastic surgeries.

Detailed description

Background: protection of the palatal wound is an essential step following harvesting a palatal soft tissue graft. During the last decades, several materials were used to avoid protect against the post-operative problems as bleeding, pain and possible infections. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the usage of polypropylene mesh, compared to the conventional custom-made acrylic stent for efficacy in protection of the palatal wound and reducing the bleeding tendency and post-operative pain. Patients and methods: A single blinded, parallel group randomized controlled trial took place. Twenty sites were approved to be treated using soft tissue grafting technique with the need for a palatally harvested free graft. The palatal wounds were protected with propylene mesh and custom-made acrylic palatal sten. Participants were qualitatively assessed for bleeding duration, bleeding amount, pain duration, infection possibility, inflammation at 2, 4, 6, 8, 14 days post-operatively. The patient acceptance was also evaluated.

Interventions

DEVICEpropylene mesh

propylene mesh as a palatal stent for palatal wound

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

medically free, above 18 years old, non-smokers with healthy reduced periodontium (free of any active disease either gingivitis or periodontitis) -

Exclusion criteria

During selection, smokers, medically compromised, pregnant and lactating mothers, patients with gagging reflex, incompliant patients, presence of periodontal disease, presence of fixed orthodontic palatal appliance were excluded \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding intensity14 daysEvaluation of the bleeding amount using VAS test (descriptive tool)
Bleeding duration14 daysEvaluation of the duration of bleeding
Pain level: VAS14 daysevaluation of the pain severity using VAS test (descriptive tool)
pain duration14 daysevaluation of the pain duration

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026