Skip to content

Evaluate the Efficacy & Safety of Leronlimab in Patients With Severe or Critical COVID-19

A Phase 2b/3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Adaptive Design Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Leronlimab for Patients With Severe or Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04347239
Enrollment
484
Registered
2020-04-15
Start date
2020-04-16
Completion date
2022-06-15
Last updated
2025-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronavirus Disease 2019

Keywords

COVID-19

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was assess the safety and efficacy of leronlimab (PRO 140) administered as weekly subcutaneous injection in subjects with severe or critical COVID-19 disease.

Detailed description

This was a Phase 2b/3, two-arm, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, adaptive design multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of leronlimab (PRO 140) in patients with severe or critical symptoms of respiratory illness caused by coronavirus 2019 infection. Patients will be randomized to receive weekly doses of 700 mg leronlimab (PRO 140), or placebo. Leronlimab (PRO 140) and placebo will be administered via subcutaneous injection. A single arm, non-randomized, open-label phase was added to the protocol after completion of enrollment in the randomized phase of the study. The study had three phases: Screening Period, Treatment Period, and Follow-Up Period.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Leronlimab (PRO) 140 is a humanized IgG4, monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)

Sponsors

CytoDyn, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Unblinded pharmacists at clinical sites were notified of the arm to which the subjects were enrolled for the randomized portion of the study in order to prepare the appropriate treatment. There was no masking for the open-label portion of the study.

Intervention model description

There were 394 participants randomized to the blinded portion of the study using an Interactive Response Technology (IRT) system. A separate cohort of 90 new participants were enrolled in the open label portion of the study after completion of enrollment of the blinded portion. None of the participants involved in the blinded portion of the study were included in the open label portion.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female adult ≥ 18 years of age at time of screening. 2. Subjects hospitalized with severe or critical illness caused by coronavirus 2019 infection as defined below: A. Severe Illness: \- Diagnosed with COVID-19 by standard reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay or equivalent testing within 5 days of screening AND Symptoms of severe systemic illness/infection with COVID-19: \- At least 1 of the following: fever, cough, sore throat, malaise, headache, muscle pain, shortness of breath at rest or with exertion, confusion, or symptoms of severe lower respiratory symptoms including dyspnea at rest or respiratory distress AND Clinical signs indicative of severe systemic illness/infection with COVID-19, with at least 1 of the following: \- respiration rate (RR) ≥ 30, heart rate (HR) ≥ 125, saturated oxygen (SaO2) \<93% on room air or requires \> 2L oxygen by nasal canula (NC) in order maintain SaO2 ≥93%, PaO2/FiO2 \<300 (ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to fraction of inspired oxygen) AND \- None of the following: Respiratory failure (defined by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, oxygen delivered by high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, or clinical diagnosis of respiratory failure in setting of resource limitations), Septic shock (defined by systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mm Hg, or Diastolic BP \< 60 mm Hg), Multiple organ dysfunction/failure B. Critical Illness: \- Diagnosed with COVID-19 by standard RT-PCR assay or equivalent testing within 5 days of screening AND Evidence of critical illness, defined by at least 1 of the following: \- Respiratory failure defined based on resource utilization requiring at least 1 of the following: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, oxygen delivered by high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or clinical diagnosis of respiratory failure (in setting of resource limitation) OR \- Shock (defined by SBP \< 90 mm Hg, or Diastolic BP \< 60 mm Hg or requiring vasopressors) OR -Multiple organ dysfunction/failure 3. Subject, if intubated, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) \<15 cmH2O with PaO2/FiO2 \>150 mmHg. 4. Electrocardiogram (ECG) with no clinically significant findings as assessed by the Investigator 5. Subject (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures. 6. Understands and agrees to comply with planned study procedures. 7. Women of childbearing potential and their partner must agree to use at least one highly effective method of contraception (e.g., hormonal contraceptives \[implants, injectables, combination oral contraceptives, transdermal patches, or contraceptive rings\], intrauterine devices, bilateral tubal occlusion, or sexual abstinence) for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) and/or do-not-intubate (DNI) orders or expected to be made DNR/DNI in setting of resource limitations or family wishes. 2. Not a candidate for dialysis or continuation of care (or full medical support) in setting of resource limitations. 3. Subject on continuous vasopressors (at the dose of norepinephrine \>20μg/min and/or vasopressin \>0.04 units/kg/min) for \>48 hours at time of screening. 4. Subjects who have a history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to leronlimab (PRO 140) are not eligible. 5. Inability to provide informed consent or to comply with test requirements 6. Consideration by the investigator, for safety reasons, that the subject is an unsuitable candidate to receive study treatment 7. Pregnancy or breast feeding 8. Subject participating in another study with for an investigational treatment for COVID-19. Note: Subject who were prescribed (1) hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without azithromycin, (2) Remdesivir, (3) convalescent plasma therapy, or (4) immunomodulatory treatments (including but not limited to sarilumab, clazakizumab, tocilizumab, and anakinra) for the off-label treatment of COVID-19 prior to study enrollment may be included and may continue to receive these agents as part of standard-of-care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality at Day 28Mortality at day 28 (Visit 2, start of treatment = day 0)Incidence of mortality at day 28

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality at Day 14Mortality at day 14 (initiation of treatment = day 0)Day 0 refers to the data of randomization/first treatment.
Proportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Change from baseline to days 14 and 28Evaluation of the clinical status of participants at Day 28 was assessed with a 7-level ordinal scale (OS) (with higher score indicating better outcome). The OS of patient health status ranged from: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 7) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The study enrolled hospitalized patients with an OS Score of 2, 3, or 4 at baseline. The OS score of 6 refers to a participant who is not hospitalized with limitation on activities and 7 refers to not hospitalized with no limitations on activities.
Change in Clinical Status of Subjects at Day 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale)Change from start of treatment (baseline) to day 28Evaluation of the clinical status of participants at Day 28 was assessed with a 7-level ordinal scale (OS) (with higher score indicating better outcome). The OS of patient health status ranged from: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 7) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The study enrolled hospitalized patients with an OS Score of 2, 3, or 4 at baseline. Baseline is last available value before treatment. Change from baseline is based on patients with paired values. The p value is from rank ANCOVA model adjusted for stratification factor and age using imputed data. All results and change from baseline are based on the result of multiple imputation.
Length of Hospital StayTimeframe is from screening visit to end of treatment (visit 5)Length of Hospital Stay measured in days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-Cause Mortality at Day 14 in the Critically Ill PopulationMortality at day 14 (initiation of treatment = day 0)All-cause mortality at day 14 in the critically ill population. Day 0 refers to the date of randomization/first treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States. First patient was enrolled into Part 1 of the study (blinded portion) on 16-April-2020. Data submitted represent analysis performed on data collected after all patients completed the Follow Up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
700mg Leronlimab
Two syringes, each containing 350mg of leronlimab in 2mL, allowed administration of the 700mg dose, subcutaneously. Leronlimab (PRO) 140 is a humanized IgG4, monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5)
259
Placebo
Two syringes each containing 2mL of normal saline for injection were prepared by an unblinded pharmacist at the clinical sites for use as the placebo.
125
700mg Leronlimab - open label
Two syringes, each containing 350mg of leronlimab in 2mL, allowed administration of the 700mg dose, subcutaneously.
89
Total473

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Blinded PortionPt randomized to study but withdrew consent before treatment with investigational product604
Open LabelPt enrolled but withdrew consent prior to dosing100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal700mg LeronlimabPlacebo700mg Leronlimab - open label
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
149 Participants88 Participants29 Participants32 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
324 Participants171 Participants96 Participants57 Participants
Age, Continuous58.72 years58.82 years58.51 years59.18 years
COVID SYMPTOM SCORE3.2 units on a scale3.2 units on a scale3.2 units on a scale3.3 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
19 Participants11 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
69 Participants29 Participants23 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
110 Participants85 Participants25 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants0 Participants0 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
257 Participants133 Participants70 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
473 participants259 participants125 participants89 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
157 Participants90 Participants42 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
316 Participants169 Participants83 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
31 / 12560 / 25923 / 89
other
Total, other adverse events
77 / 125142 / 25929 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 12599 / 25935 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

All-cause Mortality at Day 28

Incidence of mortality at day 28

Time frame: Mortality at day 28 (Visit 2, start of treatment = day 0)

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population was used for the analysis. The mITT population is defined as the set of subjects who randomized and have received at least one dose of leronlimab (PRO 140) or placebo. This population was used for the primary efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
700mg LeronlimabAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Mortality52 Participants
700mg LeronlimabAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Survival207 Participants
PlaceboAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Mortality27 Participants
PlaceboAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Survival98 Participants
700mg Open LabelAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Mortality23 Participants
700mg Open LabelAll-cause Mortality at Day 28Survival66 Participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality at Day 14

Day 0 refers to the data of randomization/first treatment.

Time frame: Mortality at day 14 (initiation of treatment = day 0)

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population was used for the analysis. The mITT population is defined as the set of subjects who randomized and have received at least one dose of leronlimab (PRO 140) or placebo. This population was used for the secondary outcome endpoint analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
700mg LeronlimabAll-cause Mortality at Day 1425 Participants
PlaceboAll-cause Mortality at Day 1413 Participants
700mg Open LabelAll-cause Mortality at Day 1417 Participants
Secondary

Change in Clinical Status of Subjects at Day 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale)

Evaluation of the clinical status of participants at Day 28 was assessed with a 7-level ordinal scale (OS) (with higher score indicating better outcome). The OS of patient health status ranged from: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 7) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The study enrolled hospitalized patients with an OS Score of 2, 3, or 4 at baseline. Baseline is last available value before treatment. Change from baseline is based on patients with paired values. The p value is from rank ANCOVA model adjusted for stratification factor and age using imputed data. All results and change from baseline are based on the result of multiple imputation.

Time frame: Change from start of treatment (baseline) to day 28

Population: Rank ANCOVA model adjusted for stratification factor and age based on non-missing observed data. Change from baseline is based on patients with paired values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
700mg LeronlimabChange in Clinical Status of Subjects at Day 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale)1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
PlaceboChange in Clinical Status of Subjects at Day 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale)1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
700mg Open LabelChange in Clinical Status of Subjects at Day 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale)1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

Length of Hospital Stay measured in days

Time frame: Timeframe is from screening visit to end of treatment (visit 5)

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population was used for the analysis. The mITT population is defined as the set of subjects who randomized and have received at least one dose of leronlimab (PRO 140) or placebo. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from the analysis. This population was used for the secondary outcome endpoint analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
700mg LeronlimabLength of Hospital Stay15 Days
PlaceboLength of Hospital Stay14 Days
700mg Open LabelLength of Hospital Stay14 Days
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).

Evaluation of the clinical status of participants at Day 28 was assessed with a 7-level ordinal scale (OS) (with higher score indicating better outcome). The OS of patient health status ranged from: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities; 7) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The study enrolled hospitalized patients with an OS Score of 2, 3, or 4 at baseline. The OS score of 6 refers to a participant who is not hospitalized with limitation on activities and 7 refers to not hospitalized with no limitations on activities.

Time frame: Change from baseline to days 14 and 28

Population: Responders refer to subjects who achieved a category of 6 or higher at Day 14 and/or Day 28. Note: Proportions are based on the result of multiple imputation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d140.62 Proportion of patients
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d140.38 Proportion of patients
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at D140 Proportion of patients
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d280.41 Proportion of patients
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d280.58 Proportion of patients
700mg LeronlimabProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at d280 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d280.55 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d140.58 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d280.45 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at d280 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at D140 Proportion of patients
PlaceboProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d140.42 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at D140.13 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d280.47 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d280.46 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Missing at d280.07 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Responders at d140.39 Proportion of patients
700mg Open LabelProportion of Patients Achieving a Category of 6 or Higher on the Ordinal Scale at Days 14 and 28 (on a 7 Point Ordinal Scale).Non-responders at d140.47 Proportion of patients
Other Pre-specified

All-Cause Mortality at Day 14 in the Critically Ill Population

All-cause mortality at day 14 in the critically ill population. Day 0 refers to the date of randomization/first treatment.

Time frame: Mortality at day 14 (initiation of treatment = day 0)

Population: There were 62 patients in the critically ill population. Critically ill was defined as patients that were hospitalized, on invasive ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Critically ill subjects were a subgroup of the Modified Intent to Treat population used for this analysis. As defined in the SAP, subgroup analysis was performed on predefined stratification factors including the subgroup of patients identified as critically ill and defined as above.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
700mg LeronlimabAll-Cause Mortality at Day 14 in the Critically Ill Population2 Participants
PlaceboAll-Cause Mortality at Day 14 in the Critically Ill Population5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026