Skip to content

The Effect of Emotional Working Memory Training on Reducing Depressive Symptoms

The Effect of Emotional Working Memory Training on Reducing Depressive Symptoms

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04346771
Enrollment
31
Registered
2020-04-15
Start date
2019-12-18
Completion date
2021-01-10
Last updated
2020-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Symptoms

Keywords

Depression, Cognitive control, Emotion, Working memory, Cognitive bias, Emotional regulation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether emotional working memory training and attention bias modification training are an effective neurobehavioral therapy to improve depressive symptoms.That is whether emotional working memory training is superior to attention bias modification training or not in reducing depressive symptoms over 1 year after training.

Detailed description

Attentional bias has been theorized to play a critical role in the onset and maintenance of depression. Attentional bias modification training (ABMT), an experimental paradigm that uses training to induce adaptive attentional bias, was developed to test the causal model and this has therapeutic implications in depression.To test the effect of ABMT on treatment of depressive symptoms, a randomized, double-blind, placebo and blank controlled trial is conducted in college students who are experiencing mild-to-severe symptoms of depression.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWorking memory training

Participants complete 10 sessions of maintaining positive working memory training during a two-week period. Each session consists of 15 blocks.

BEHAVIORALPositive ABMT

Participants complete 8 sessions of attention bias modification training (ABMT) during a two-week period. Each session consists of 218 trials, and the time to complete a training session is 12 minutes.

Sponsors

Hunan Normal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Meet the major and mild depression disorder's criteria

Exclusion criteria

bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or organic mental disorder; any concurrent psychotherapy; any concurrent psychotropic medication.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of depressive symptomspre-training, post-training(2 weeks after pre-training), follow-ups(1-week,2-week,4-week,7-week,3-month( booster pre-training), 4-month (booster post-training), 5-month,6-month,12-month after post-training)Depression symptoms tested by clinicians using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes of self-reported depressive symptomspre-training, post-training(2 weeks after pre-training), follow-ups(1-week,2-week,4-week,7-week,3-month( booster pre-training), 4-month (booster post-training), 5-month,6-month,12-month after post-training)Self-reported depressive symptoms assessed by Beck depression scale-second version (BDI-II)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026