Skip to content

Efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) Block Compared to Ultrasound-guided TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominus Plane (TAP) Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeries: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04345341
Acronym
TAP
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-04-14
Start date
2020-11-01
Completion date
2023-10-15
Last updated
2023-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

the Efficacy of Analgesia of Laparoscopic TAP Block in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Surgeries

Keywords

TAP block , laparoscopy , minimally invasive gynecology

Brief summary

We propose a clinical trial to determine the efficacy of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane (LA-TAP) performed intraoperatively compared with usual postoperative analgesia without LA-TAP block. We hypothesise that there will be a decrease in postoperative opioid utilization and in pain scores for patients randomized to receive the LA-TAP block verses those who do not. We expect that patients will opt to take less break through opioid medication in the LA-TAP block group versus the no TAP block group. Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes: Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction?

Detailed description

Investigators aim to answer the above questions through the following primary and secondary outcomes: Primary outcomes Is there a difference in pain scores reported by the patient at 24 hours following LA-TAP versus no TAP block? Is there a clinically significant difference in cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) at 24 hours following LA-TAP blocks versus no TAP block? Secondary outcomes Is there a difference between study groups in pain scores at 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between study groups in total opioid consumption (MMEs) by 48 & 72 hours? Is there a difference between the study groups for reported post-operative nausea and vomiting? Is there a difference between the study groups in operating time? Is there a difference between the study groups in the length of Hospital stay? Is there a difference between the study groups in patient's satisfaction? Patients will be randomized in two arms , LA-TAP , NO-TAP block . Each patient would fill out the pain score sheet and number of narcotic medications she used in first 24h, 48h and 72 h post operatively .

Interventions

DRUGTAP block with liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine

injecting the mixture of bupivacaine with liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane to block the somatic nerves

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18 years old and above * English speaking * patients with capacity to consent * Elective laparoscopic and robotic benign genecology cases * Elective laparoscopy/ robotic hysterectomy * Elective laparoscopy/robotic myomectomy * ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocol applied

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * patients with positive urine pregnancy test in pre operative * emergency procedures * Procedure requiring staging or debulking * surgeries that convert to laparotomy * patients with allergy to local/systemic anaesthesia or analgesia * Inability to undergo normal anesthesia induction process * ASA III or higher * history of pain relief medication dependence * history of substance abuse * end stage chronic kidney disease * advanced liver disease * history of chronic pain * history of taking opioids or neuropathic agents regularly prior to surgery * BMI of 50 or over * skin infections at the site of TAP block injection or port sites.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain scores at 24 hours in LA-TAP and NO TAP block groups24 hour post opnumeric pain score (NPS)pain scores at 24 hours will include the average pain score at rest reported by the patient in the first 24 hours.
Amount and type of opioid consumption , based on Questionnaire's information . between LA-TAP , UG-TAP and No TAP groups at 24 hours post operatively24 hour post opMME will be calculated as the cumulative amount of opioid intake in the 24 hours following anesthesia end time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric pain score (NPS) based on questionnaire's information at 48 hours & 72 hours post operatively , in LA-TAP , UG-TAp and no TAP groups48 -72 hour post operativenumeric pain score (NPS)
amount of narcotic , per milligram and type of opiod consumption at 48 & 72 hours post operatively ?48 -72 hours post operativemorphine equivalent dose of narcotic use
Nausea and vomiting post operatively , based on questionnaire's information at first 72 h post opfirst 72 hours post operativenausea and vomiting, yes or no .

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026