Skip to content

Far Infrared Therapy on Peritoneal Function of CAPD Patients

The Effect of Far Infrared Therapy on Peritoneal Function of CAPD Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04344067
Acronym
CAPD
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-04-14
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2020-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-stage Renal Disease

Keywords

Peritoneal Dialysis, Far Infrared Therapy

Brief summary

For patients with end-stage renal disease, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been proven to be an alternative choice compared to hemodialysis as a type of maintenance renal replacement therapy. Despite this, long-term PD is associated with structural membrane changes that are believed to contribute to alterations in solute transport and loss of ultrafiltration. Previous studies have proven that far-infrared (FIR) therapy may improve not only the arteriovenous fistula patency in hemodialysis patients but also abdominal discomfort due to encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in PD patients. Since there is little information concerning this issue, this study was conducted in order to evaluate the possible effects of FIR therapy on the peritoneal function of patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of FIR therapy on the peritoneal function, protein loss, and ultrafiltration capacity of CAPD patients.

Detailed description

A total of 100 CAPD patients will be enrolled in this study, including 50 in treatment group who will receive FIR therapy for 6 months and 50 in control group. Many parameters of blood and urine samples as well as ultrafiltration amount, dialysate urea nitrogen, creatinine, Na+, K+, total protein, CA-125, and glucose degradation product (GDP) for the dialysate effluent of not only the first and last exchanges but also the total exchanges of daily PD regimen will be measured for both groups at day 1 and 6th month. However, only the FIR group will receive tests of blood, urine and dialysate on day 2. The significance of the study is that patients might benefit from the prophylactic therapeutic effects of FIR therapy, leading to the reduction of the hospitalization costs and the need for interventional procedures in CAPD patient care in Taiwan.

Interventions

DEVICEFar Infrared Therapy

The WSTM TY101 FIR emitter (WS Far Infrared Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan) was used to conduct FIR therapy in this study. The electrified ceramic plates of the emitter generated electromagnetic waves with wavelengths in the range between 3 and 25 μm (a peak between 5 to 6 μm). The irradiating power density is 10 and 20 milliwatt (mw) /cm2 when the top radiator was set at a distance of 30 and 20 cm above the skin surface respectively.

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants are assigned to either the control group or the treatment (far infrared therapy) group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic peritoneal dialysis patients who have not received any FIR therapy within the previous 12 months * Patients on a standard continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (1.5-2 L; 4-5 exchanges/day) or ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (APD) program

Exclusion criteria

* History of CAPD-related peritonitis within 3 months prior to the study period; * History of cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction or interventional procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or stent) for coronary artery disease within the 3 months prior to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
KT/VChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsK - dialyzer urea clearance; t - dialysis time; V - total volume within the body that urea is distributed
Weekly creatinine clearanceChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsWCCr (L/wk/1.73m\^2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
D/D0 glucose ratioChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsPeritoneal function parameter
D/PCr ratioChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsPeritoneal function parameter
D/P urea ratioChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsPeritoneal function parameter
AlbuminChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsBiochemical function parameter (g/dL)
Ultrafiltration volumeChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsPeritoneal function parameter (mL)
CreatinineChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsBiochemical function parameter (mg/dL)
Major cardiovascular adverse eventsChange from baseline level at 12 months3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) comprising of non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, coronary artery disease (CAD), hospitalized heart failure (HHF)
Infection events (number of hospital admission events)Change from baseline level at 12 monthsPneumonia, peritonitis
Blood urea nitrogenChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsBiochemical function parameter (mg/dL)
Net volumeChange from baseline level at 6 months and 12 monthsPeritoneal function parameter (mL)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026