Skip to content

Oocyte Survival After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared With Liquid Nitrogen

Oocyte Survival After Vitrification With Slush Nitrogen Compared With Liquid Nitrogen

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04342364
Enrollment
27
Registered
2020-04-13
Start date
2020-04-08
Completion date
2021-07-01
Last updated
2022-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of slush nitrogen results in higher post-thaw survival rates for oocytes compared to conventionally used liquid nitrogen.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized, controlled trial which seeks to characterize oocyte survival rate following vitrification and subsequent warming with both slush nitrogen and liquid nitrogen. After warming, fertilization and embryology outcomes will be assessed. Oocyte donors and a single donor sperm source will be utilized. Following enrollment, oocyte donors will undergo ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. The mature (MII) oocytes obtained for each patient will then be assigned a number and randomized via block randomization to one of two treatment groups (liquid nitogen or slush nitrogen). Through block randomization, this will create a paired population of oocytes so that half of each patient's oocytes will undergo cryopreservation with liquid nitrogen and half will undergo cryopreservation with slush nitrogen. Timing of hyaluronidase stripping and vitrification will be consistent with current institutional clinical practice for oocytes. Following cryopreservation, oocytes will be warmed and intracytoplasmic sperm injection will be performed and subsequent embryology outcomes tracked.

Interventions

oocytes will be vitrified using slush nitrogen

OTHERVitrification via liquid nitrogen

oocytes will be vitrified using liquid nitrogen which is currently routine practice

Sponsors

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

embryologist assessing oocyte survival (primary outcome) is blinded

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial in a paired design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria for oocyte donors: 1. Age 30 years or younger who meet institutional criteria to be an oocyte donor. 2. Patients who agree to donate oocytes for research purposes and agree to the study protocol. 3. The subgroup of oocyte donors age 35-38 will not be part of the primary analysis, and therefore will not be required to meet the age criteria listed above. The older group of donors will be chosen as the clinical discretion of the study investigators. No specific ovarian reserve cutoffs will be required, although factors related to ovarian reserve will be taken into consideration. Major

Exclusion criteria

for oocyte donors: 1. Under 18 years old 2. All patients who do not voluntarily give their written consent for participation. 3. Patients who do not meet standard institutional criteria for oocyte donation. 4. A diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
oocyte survival ratewithin 5 minutes post warmingnumber of viable oocytes post warming

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fertilization rate18 hours post injectionnumber of zygotes post intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
blastulation rate4-6 days after fertilizationnumber of zygotes reaching the blastocyst stage of embryo development
euploid rate1 week after trophectoderm biopsynumber of chromosomally normal embryos

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026