Skip to content

Increased Proportion of Lower Energy Density Items vs. Nutritional Labelling at an Online Supermarket

Effectiveness of Information-based Versus Structural Interventions on Food Choices by Socioeconomic Position: a Randomized Controlled Trial in an Experimental Online Supermarket

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04340791
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2020-04-10
Start date
2020-04-13
Completion date
2020-05-13
Last updated
2020-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet, Healthy, Food Selection

Keywords

availability, labelling, food choice, socio-economic position

Brief summary

This study will be a 2x2 randomised controlled trial with information-based intervention (no labelling / labelling) and structural intervention (default proportion / increased proportion of lower energy density food items) as between-subject factors and energy density (kcal/g) of food purchases during an online supermarket-shopping task as dependent variable. This study will use an online supermarket platform developed to mimic an online supermarket website and participants will be asked to complete a shopping task using a pre-determined shopping list of 10 items.

Detailed description

See attached protocol documents.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIncreased proportion of lower energy density items

The proportion of lower energy density vs. higher energy density items will be reversed (67% lower - 33% higher) relative to the default proportion condition (D and DL) (33% lower - 67% higher). Lower energy density items will be defined as lower energy density ≤ median of energy density distribution within a food category.

BEHAVIORALLabelling

When energy density of an item ≤ median of ED distribution within a food category, healthier choice badges will be added to the food item pictures on the online supermarket. Instructions when logging-into the platform will introduce the badges to the participants: In the online supermarket, the green tick allows you to see which products (e.g. muesli) in each product category (e.g. cereals) are healthier choices with fewer calories per gram than most other products in the same category.

Sponsors

University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* United Kingdom residents * Aged ≥ 18 years * Fluent in English * Have access to a computer and Internet * Responsible for a substantial proportion of household grocery shopping

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent and to comply with the study requirements * Any dietary restriction (vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free, sugar-free, dairy or lactose free, food allergy, other)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean ED of the food items purchased (kcal/100g)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the sum of the energy of the purchased items (kcal) divided by the sum of their weight (g) and multiplied by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total energy of the food items purchased (kcal)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the sum of the energy of the purchased items (kcal)
Energy from total sugar (% of total energy)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the percentage of total energy of the purchased items from total sugar
Energy from saturated fatty acids (SFA) (% of total energy)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the percentage of total energy of the purchased items from SFA
Proportion of lower energy density food items in the basket of foods purchased20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Lower energy density items will be defined as ≤ median of energy density distribution within a food category
Cost (GPB)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the sum of the prices of the purchased items
Salt content (g/100g)20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the food shopping task online and there is no follow up)Calculated as the sum of the salt content of the purchased items (g) divided by the sum of their weight (g) and multiplied by 100.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Validity5 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to fill in the debriefing questionnaire and there is no follow up)Mean of item I would normally buy \[the 10 items on the shopping list\] for all the food items coded as: 1 = Never; 2 = Very rarely; 3 = Rarely; 4 = Occasionally; 5 = Frequently; 6 = Very frequently.
Kcal influence5 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to fill in the debriefing questionnaire and there is no follow up)Answer to the item The choices I made during online shopping were influenced by how many calories I thought were in the options available. coded as: 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Slightly disagree; 4 = Neutral; 5 = Slightly agree; 6 = Agree; 7 = Strongly agree

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026