Skip to content

NobleStitch EL STITCH Trial is a PFO Comparative Trial

STITCH - Prospective Multi Center Comparative Parallel Concurrent Study of the NobleStitch EL Compared to FDA Approved Amplatzer Occluder Device for Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Stroke

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04339699
Acronym
STITCH
Enrollment
640
Registered
2020-04-09
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Foramen Ovale, Patent, Stroke, Ischemic

Keywords

Patent Foramen Ovale, Stroke

Brief summary

STITCH - Prospective Multi-Center Comparative Parallel Concurrent Study of the NobleStitch™ EL versus FDA-approved Amplatzer Occluder device for closure of Patent Foramen Ovale to prevent recurrent Ischemic stroke.

Detailed description

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the NobleStitch™ EL with medical management in both safety and effectiveness compared to the FDA-approved Amplatzer Occluder with medical management for PFO Closure. To demonstrate that the NobleStitch EL does not increase the incidence of ischemic stroke compared to published medical management data.

Interventions

DEVICENobleStitch™EL Suture Mediated Closure System

Percutaneous closure of Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) using NobleStitch™EL suture Medicate Closure System

Percutaneous closure of Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) using Amplatzer PFO Occluder

Sponsors

Nobles Medical Technologies II Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A 640 participants indicated for percutaneous transcatheter closure of a PFO to reduce risk of recurrent Ischemic Stroke; between ages 18 - 60 years, who have had a Cryptogenic Stroke due to Paradoxical Embolism. To be conducted both in the USA and the European Union.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provision of signed and dated informed consent form * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study * Male or female ages 18 - 60 years old * A PFO and a Cryptogenic Stroke verified by a neurologist * Stroke is defined as an acute focal neurological deficit, presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either: * Symptoms persisting ≥24 hours, or * Symptoms persisting \<24 hours with Magnetic Resonance or CT findings of a new, neuroanatomical relevant infarct * Cryptogenic stroke was defined as a stroke of unknown cause * Prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring (recommended 30 days and not less than 24 hours required) * Intra and extracranial artery imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography, CT angiography, or contrast angiography, or contrast angiography or echocardiography of the carotid arteries to rule out ischemic stroke associated with atherosclerotic plaque, arterial dissection, or other vascular diseases. (The aortic arch may also be evaluated by TEE). * Hypercoagulable state assessment to rule out an underlying hypercoagulable state

Exclusion criteria

* Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy during the course of the study * Age \<18 or \> 60 years of age * Previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months * Clinically significant mitral or aortic valve stenosis or severe regurgitation * Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \<50 percent * Progressive neurological dysfunction or reduced life expectancy * Contrast allergy * Atrial Septal Defect (baseline left to right shunt assessed by TEE or other congenital heart diseases * Active Endocarditis * Perspective participants with known causes of Ischemic Stroke * Arterial dissection * Contraindicated or unsuitable for antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants * Perspective participants with prosthetic heart valves * Uncontrolled diabetes Mellitus * Pulmonary hypertension * Uncontrolled systemic hypertension * Intracranial pathology * Neurological deficits not due to stroke that may affect neurologic assessments * Active autoimmune disease * Active infection * Alcohol and/or drug abuse * A requirement for chronic anticoagulation therapy that cannot be discontinued * Anatomic features (inability to achieve vascular access)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effective PFO closure rate of the NobleStitch EL6 monthsEffectiveness PFO closure rate of NobleStitch EL suture mediated closure with medical management compared to Amplatzer PFO occluder with medical management for PFO closure. Effective PFO closure rate defined as Grade 0 or 1 shunt at rest and during Valsalva at 6 month post closure attempts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decreased event rate of recurrent ischemic stroke following PFO closure using NobleStitch EL5 yearsSafety of NobleStitch EL suture mediated closure system as compared to Amplatzer PFO Occluder Procedural and device related adverse event rate at 6 month follow up recurrent ischemic stroke through 5 years follow up

Countries

Italy, United States

Contacts

CONTACTJames A Thompson, MD
jthomp80@jhmi.edu727-767-7328
CONTACTAnthony Nobles, Phd
anobles@noblesmed2.com714-427-0398
STUDY_DIRECTORAnthony A Nobles, PhD

Nobles Medical Technologies II Inc

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026