Skip to content

Is Masseteric Nerve Block Effective in Myofascial Pain

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Treatment Modalities in Masseteric Myofascial Pain: Masseteric Nerve Block, Local Anesthetic Injection and Dry-needling

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04339673
Enrollment
45
Registered
2020-04-09
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2019-11-30
Last updated
2020-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthesia, Myofascial Pain - Dysfunction Syndrome of TMJ, Myofascial Trigger Point Pain

Keywords

pain, injections, anesthetics

Brief summary

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of three different treatment methods in the management of myofascial pain: masseteric nerve block (MN), trigger point injection(TrP) with local anesthetic (LA) and dry needling (DN).Study Design: 45 subjects aged 18-54 years were randomly assigned to the MN group (n= 15), LA group (n=15) and DN group (n=15).

Detailed description

The study sample consisted 45 patients with masseter muscle originated myofascial pain, were selected in accordance with the following criteria: Patients were grouped according to the treatment they received: dry-needling (DN), TrP injections with local anesthetic (LA) and masseteric nerve block (MNB). Localization of the masseteric trigger points (MTPs) was based on clinician's sense and patients' expressions of pain. Local twitch response was not observable in all case. This procedure was completed by using digital palpation (1.5 Kg), and the clinical examiner's palpation was calibrated using a pressure algometer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmasseteric nerve block

regional bloc of masseter

trigger point injection with local anesthetic

PROCEDUREdry needling

needling with acupuncture needles of trigger points in masseter

Sponsors

Erzincan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomized parallel controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 54 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of myofascial pain. * Presence of at least one trigger point in masseter muscle.

Exclusion criteria

* Generalized muscle disorders. * Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Rate of Pain on Function (PoF) assessed by Numerical pain Scale (NRS)before the injections (T0, Baseline)Patients rated their pain on function (pain during chewing or speaking etc.) on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Rate of Pain Intensity on Palpation (PoP)before the injections (T0, Baseline)Patients rated their pain intensity on masseter muscle by a 4-point Likert-type scale (0 = no pain, 3 = as worst pain imaginable) while a calibrated examiner palpating their masseter muscle.
The measurement of pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO) in millimetersbefore the injections (T0, Baseline)Pain-free MMO was measured as the distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower incisors while patient's mouth is open as possible without any assistance and without pain in masseter muscle. Three measurements were performed, and their average is recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026