Skip to content

HOME-CoV: Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With a SARS-CoV-2 Infection

HOME-CoV: Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With Confirmed or Probable SARS-CoV-2 Infection. A Before and After Implementation of a Consensus Help-decision Making Rule Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04338841
Acronym
HOME-CoV
Enrollment
3133
Registered
2020-04-08
Start date
2020-04-09
Completion date
2020-06-17
Last updated
2020-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronavirus Infection

Keywords

covid-19, outpatient, expert consensus, decision-making

Brief summary

COVID-19 pandemic has developed worldwide in less than 4 months. The clinical presentations are variable widely, ranging from simple rhinitis to major lung damage that can lead to death. In many countries involved in the ongoing health disaster due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospital are overloaded. In this context, the decision to hospitalize or to manage COVID-19 patients at home is crucial and defining reliable and consensual criteria is a major issue. HOME-CoV study is a multicentre quasi-experimental interventional study, before and after implementation of a help-decision making rule (HOME-CoV rule), developed via the Delphi method. Our main hypothesis is that a strategy based on the consensual HOME-CoV rule compared to current practice is at least as safe as regards the 7-day-rate of adverse events (safety criterion) and more effective as regards the rate of patients eventually managed as outpatients (efficacy criterion).

Detailed description

Definition of HOME-CoV rule: The Delphi method is used to reach a consensus of a large panel of experts and to define an easy-to-use clinical rule aiming to help emergency physicians in hospitalisation or outpatient management decision making : the HOME-CoV rule. The impact of the rule implementation is evaluated in a before and after study: * before period: observational assessment of current practices * implementation period : educational lectures, posters, and pocket cards showing and explaining HOME-CoV rule are communicated to participating Emergency Departments. * after period : observational assessment of practices In each period, patients consulting Emergency Departments with suspected or probable COVID-19 are evaluated for potential inclusion. Clinical, biological and imaging data that may be involved in decision-making about hospitalization are collected as well as the physician final decision (hospitalization or outpatient management) and its main determinants. A phone-call follow-up is performed and the clinical status according to the Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement of COVID-19 from the World Heath Organization is collected on day 7 and day 28 following inclusion.

Interventions

OTHERHOME-CoV rule implementation

HOME-CoV rule is an easy-to-use clinical rule aiming to help emergency physicians in hospitalisation or outpatient management decision making. The definition of the rule is performed using the Delphi method to reach a consensus of a large panel of experts. Between before and after period, educational lectures, posters, and pocket cards showing and explaining HOME-CoV rule are communicated to participating Emergency Departments.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Quasi-experimental before and after multicentre prospective study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient (≥ 18 years old) * Admitted for COVID-19 infection confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR or considered probable by the physician in charge of the patient. * Not requiring care in intensive care unit or resuscitation unit or * No subject of a limitation decision of active therapies, * Free informed express consent to participate in the study orally given or signed by the patient according to local legislation, * Insurance cover according to local legislation;

Exclusion criteria

* Patient whose main diagnostic hypothesis in the emergency room is not a SARS-CoV-2 infection but another differential diagnosis, * Patient admitted to the emergency room for 18 hours or more, * Patient whose follow-up on D28 is impossible, whatever the reason, * Patient with a poor understanding of the French language, * Patient already included in the study, * Person deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, * Person under psychiatric care under duress, * Person subject to a legal protection measure, * Person unable to express consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the composite rate of adverse outcomesday 7Adverse outcomes include intubation with mechanical ventilation requirement and death (Stage ≥ 6 on Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement of the World Health Organization) within 7 days after inclusion.
The rate of hospitalization24 hoursThe rate of patients hospitalized after admission to the emergency room including patients discharged home more than 24 hours after admission. It will be analyzed in a hierarchical approach, only if first primary objective is positive i.e. non-inferiority of HOME-CoV strategy versus current practice on the rate of adverse outcomes.

Countries

Belgium, France, Monaco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026