Skip to content

Alendronate in an Weekly Effervescent Tablet Formulation Following Denosumab Discontinuation

Alendronate in an Weekly Effervescent Tablet Formulation for Preservation of Bone Mass After Denosumab Discontinuation in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass. an Observational Study (Binosto After Denosumab - the BAD Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04338529
Acronym
BAD
Enrollment
92
Registered
2020-04-08
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2024-11-01
Last updated
2024-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Keywords

Denosumab, Alendronate, osteoporosis, discontinuation of treatment

Brief summary

Discontinuation of denosumab results in a rebound response of bone turnover markers, which rise above baseline at 3 months and remain elevated until reaching again baseline levels approximately 30 months after the last dose. Bone mineral density (BMD) gains are also lost and BMD values reach original baseline values after 1-2 years off-treatment.For the above reasons, current literature recommends that patients who discontinue denosumab should continue to receive either intravenous (iv) or oral (peros) bisphosphonate therapy for some time. The study aims to investigate changes in the BMD of the lumbar spine 12 months after transitioning from denosumab to oral alendronate 70 mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation

Detailed description

Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-Β ligand (RANKL), is a potent antiresorptive agent commonly prescribed in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Discontinuation of denosumab results in a rebound response of bone turnover markers, which rise above baseline at 3 months and remain elevated until reaching again baseline levels approximately 30 months after the last dose. Bone mineral density (BMD) gains are also lost and BMD values reach original baseline values after 1-2 years off-treatment, in contrast to bisphosphonates, which remain within the skeleton acting for several months or even years after discontinuation while preserving most of the BMD gains achieved despite the cessation of treatment. For the above reasons, current literature recommends that patients who discontinue denosumab should continue to receive either intravenous (iv) or oral (peros) bisphosphonate therapy for some time. Due to lack of specifically designed studies, the period of treatment with bisphosphonates after denosumab discontinuation has been arbitrarily proposed to be 1 to 2 years. Preservation of BMD gains after denosumab discontinuation has so far been demonstrated: (a) with one year of alendronate treatment, in a study designed to investigate patients' compliance to treatment, and b) with a single dose of zolendronate 5mg iv in a recent study specifically designed to address this question in which BMD levels remained stable for the next two years. Preventing bone loss, and the reported high risk of multiple vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab treatment, is a clinical issue of critical importance raising serious concerns to the international scientific community and needs to be addressed. Clinical studies specifically designed to investigate both the efficacy of various bisphosphonates and the optimal duration of their administration in order to avoid the reported adverse effects of denosumab discontinuation are currently lacking. This study aims to investigate changes in the BMD of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) 12 months after transitioning from denosumab to oral alendronate 70 mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation. Alendronate will be given either for 6 or 12 months following Denosumab discontinuation

Interventions

As discussed in group descriptions

Sponsors

Laikο General Hospital, Athens
CollaboratorOTHER
424 General Military Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

i) osteopenic postmenopausal Caucasian women following Dmab treatment ii) assignment to treatment with alendronate in an effervescent tablet formulation following Dmab discontinuation

Exclusion criteria

i) secondary osteoporosis; ii) diseases that could affect bone metabolism iii) medications that could affect bone metabolism iv) chronic kidney disease (stage \>3b) and/or liver failure v) neoplastic disease vi) hypersensitivity to alendronate or to any of the excipients vii) abnormalities of the esophagus and other factors which delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia viii) inability to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes ix) hypocalcaemia x) confirmed esophagitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Mineral Density LS12 monthsChanges in the BMD of the lumbar spine 12 months after transitioning from denosumab to oral alendronate 70 mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Mineral Density FN12 monthsChanges in the BMD of the femoral neck (FN) of the non-dominant hip 12 months after transitioning from denosumab to oral alendronate 70 mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation
Serum levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs): P1NP, CTX and TRAP5b12 monthsChanges in BTMs 12 months after transitioning from denosumab to oral alendronate 70mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation.
Comparison of Bone Mineral Density LS12 monthsComparison of changes in the BMD of the LS after transitioning from denosumab to 12 months versus 6 months of treatment with oral alendronate 70 mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation.
Comparison of Bone Mineral Density FN12 monthsComparison of changes in the BMD of the FN of the non-dominant hip after transitioning from denosumab to 12 months versus 6 months of treatment with oral alendronate 70mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation.
Comparison of changes in: the serum levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) P1NP, CTX and TRAP5b; the 24-hours urine levels of calcium12 monthsComparison of changes in the levels of serum BTMs and 24hours urine calcium after 12 months versus 6 months treatment with oral alendronate 70mg in a weekly effervescent tablet formulation in patients previously treated with denosumab

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026