Skip to content

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Balloon Cryoablation in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

A Prospective Randomized Trial for the Comparison of Procedural Characteristics and Long-term Effects of Radiofrequency Ablation and Balloon Cryoablation in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04337567
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
2020-03-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2020-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation, ballon cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, elderly patients

Brief summary

This study compares the procedural characteristics and effectivity of radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation that are 75 years or older.

Detailed description

Radiofrequency and cryoballon ablation have been shown to be comparable to each other in terms of safety and effectivity in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, elderly patients have been underrepresented in the previous studies. The number of older patients with atrial fibrillation is high and the number of who undergo an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation increases steadily. This prospective randomized trial compares the effectivity (recurrency of atrial arrhythmias) and periprocedural characteristics of the two established ablation methods in patients who are 75 years or older.

Interventions

PROCEDUREradiofrequency ablation

ablative treatment as allocated to radiofrequency ablation

PROCEDUREballon cryoablation

ablative treatment as allocated to ballon cryoablation

Sponsors

Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation * At the day of their inclusion in the study the patients have to have completed the 75th year of life

Exclusion criteria

* Dementia * Presence of left atrial thrombus * Left atrial volume\> 50 ml/m² * Renal failure (GFR≤ 30 ml/min) * Comorbidity with an expected survival of 12 months or less.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
atrial arrhythmia recurrence1 yearNumber of Participants with recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia with a duration of 30 sec or longer 12 months after the ablative treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to wake-up after propofol withdrawalperiproceduralTime from withdrawal of propofole till patient awake and fully oriented (time, place, person)
contrast medium dosisperiproceduralAmount of contrast medium used
PropofoldosisperiproceduralPropofoldosis needed for sedation
procedural durationperiproceduralDuration of the whole procedure \[min\] inclusive preparation (from entrance to the EP lab till exit from the EP lab)
Neurological complications1 yearNumber of Participants in each randomisation arm with transient ischemic attack, cerebral insult, cerebral haemorrhage
vascular complications1 yearNumber of Participants in each randomisation arm with deep vein thrombosis, peripheral embolism.
duration of hospital staying [days]1 yearduration of hospital staying: from admission till discharge in days
groin complicationsup to 3 months after dismission from the hospitalNumber of Participants in each randomisation arm with groin complications (hematoma, av fistel, Aneuryma spurium, infection).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactCharalampos Kriatselis, MD
charalampos.kriatselis@vivantes.de0049 30 15140663741
Backup ContactMichael Distler, MD
michael.distler@vivantes.de0049 30 130 142014

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026