Skip to content

Remote Monitoring Use In Cases Of Suspected COVID-19 (Coronavirus)

REmote MOniToring usE in Suspected Cases of COVID-19 (Coronavirus): REMOTE-COVID Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04337489
Acronym
REMOTE-COVID
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
2020-07-28
Completion date
2021-03-26
Last updated
2024-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronavirus

Keywords

coronavirus, remote monitoring, deterioration, escalation

Brief summary

The study aims to see if participant deterioration due to suspected coronavirus in a designated location (e.g. hotel) can be identified sooner by wearing the sensor. If sick patients can be identified early, participants are more likely to have better outcomes; the study believes that the sensor can help us do this. The sensor measures heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature every 2 minutes and this can be reviewed by the clinical team looking after the participants.

Interventions

DEVICESensiumVitals wearable sensor

A waterproof, light, wearable sensor measuring vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature) continuously.

Sponsors

CW+ Charity
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or over. * Able to provide written consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Any participants that withdraw their consent. * A skin condition/reaction preventing wearing the wearable sensor. * The presence of a permanent pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator. * Any form of psychiatric disorder or a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may hinder communication with the research team. * Inability to cooperate or communicate with the research team.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deterioration Resulting in Healthcare Review1 yearDetection of clinical deterioration using wearable sensors resulting in healthcare review (e.g. GP telephone consultation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospitalisation1 yearDeterioration resulting in hospitalisation

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Wearable Sensor
All participants had a wearable sensor applied
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWearable Sensor
Age, Continuous34.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Deterioration Resulting in Healthcare Review

Detection of clinical deterioration using wearable sensors resulting in healthcare review (e.g. GP telephone consultation)

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wearable SensorDeterioration Resulting in Healthcare Review10 alerts generated
Secondary

Hospitalisation

Deterioration resulting in hospitalisation

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Wearable SensorHospitalisation0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026