Skip to content

Continuous Versus Intermittent cARdiac Electrical moNitorinG

Continuous Versus Intermittent cARdiac Electrical moNitorinG

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04336644
Acronym
CARING
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
2023-11-21
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Long QT Syndrome, Torsades de Pointe Caused by Drug

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to validate the continuous patch monitoring system to evaluate cardiac arrhythmias in patients receiving drugs that can cause cardiac complications and compare the continuous patch system with standard electrocardiograms (ECGs).

Interventions

DEVICEBodyGuardian Mini Plus

The BodyGuardian Mini Plus attaches to the upper chest of the patient through the use of an adhesive patch. ECG tracings are recorded continuously and sent to the linked smartphone and subsequently to a cloud server.

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and being initiated on standard of care arsenic trioxide OR Diagnosis of solid tumor and being initiated on standard of care capecitabine (alone or as part of combination treatment) OR Diagnosis of solid tumor and being initiated on standard of care ribociclib (alone or as part of combination treatment) * At least 18 years of age. * No allergy to adhesive patches. * Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 18 years of age * Allergy to adhesive patches

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of blinded, manual measurements of the ECGs to the patch monitor tracings as measured by the Bland-Altman PlotThrough Day 30* The Bland Altman plot provides a graphical method to compare the question of interest, namely that the measurements derived from the patch monitor are accurate in relation to the gold standard of the ECG. * Each QT measured from the tracing will be plotted against the difference in QT between the tracing and the 12-lead ECG. The acceptable difference between measurement techniques will be set at 5 ms (primary, strict threshold based on FDA recommendations) with a clinically acceptable difference of 15 ms (based on known variability in 12-lead ECG recordings).
Frequency of major arrhythmia occurrenceThrough Day 30* The QT interval will be assessed every 4 hours for the first 5 days and then every 8 hours thereafter
Trajectories of QT prolongationThrough day 30* Will assess the QT interval every four hours for five days after drug initiation and after five days, the QTc will be assessed every 8 hours * With this data, the investigators will plot the QTc interval (Fridericia correction) over time and determine the time of expected peak effect. Outliers will be reviewed and verified manually.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJoshua D Mitchell, M.D., FACC
jdmitchell@wustl.edu314-494-3124
Backup ContactKaitlin Moore
kaitlin.m.moore@wustl.edu314-273-0830

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026