Skip to content

Stool DNA to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Stool DNA Test to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Alaska Native People

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04336397
Enrollment
2029
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
2021-04-29
Completion date
2024-11-15
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

screening

Brief summary

Only 59% of Alaska Native people have been adequately screened for colorectal cancer (CRC) despite having the highest reported incidence of CRC in the world. A new at-home multi-target stool DNA screening test (MT-sDNA; Cologuard®) with high sensitivity for pre-cancerous polyps and CRC is now available. MT-sDNA has not been tested for feasibility or acceptability within the Alaska tribal health care delivery system, and it is unknown whether use of this new test will increase Alaska Native CRC screening rates. The long-term study goal is to improve screening and reduce CRC-attributable mortality. The objective of this application is to test the effectiveness of MT-sDNA for increasing CRC screening in Alaska Native communities using a mixed methods, community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. The study will be conducted in collaboration with regional Tribal health organizations responsible for providing health care to geographically remote Alaska Native communities. Although the proposed implementation strategy is evidence-informed and promising, it is novel in that MT-sDNA has not been evaluated in the tribal health setting or among rural/remote populations. Using the RE-AIM Model, the research will be multi-level, examining influence on patients, providers, and tribal health organizations (THOs). This research study will pursue two specific aims: (1) Identify patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with CRC screening preferences, uptake, and follow-up; and (2) test the effectiveness of graded intensity MT-sDNA intervention in the Alaska Native community setting. For the first aim, focus groups with Alaska Native people who are not adherent to CRC screening guidelines and interviews with healthcare providers will be used to identify factors for future intervention. For the second aim, a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (high intensity with patient navigation, medium intensity with mailed reminders, usual care) will provide evidence on the MT-sDNA usefulness (MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield) as well as the first data on MT-sDNA follow up adherence rates in the Alaska Native population, which will inform plans to scale-up the intervention model. This research has the potential to sustainably improve public health by increasing CRC screening rates among a rural/remote tribal population as well as provide a model for other integrated health systems that provide care to high-risk or underserved populations in the U.S. and worldwide.

Detailed description

The study will employ a cluster-randomized design, in which 32 communities within one Tribal health region will be randomized to one of the two study intervention conditions, matched by community size, with 14 communities in the control arm. All Alaska Native adults aged 45-75 due for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within each community will be offered the same intervention. At least 770 participants will be recruited in at least 13 communities per study arm. 1. High Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive navigated tribal health worker outreach, a mailed MT-sDNA kit, mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and follow-up reminders 2. Medium Intensity Intervention: Participants will receive mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available, including MT-sDNA, and navigated follow-up outreach reminders 3. Usual Care (Control arm): All other communities in the participating Tribal health region will serve as the reference group receiving usual care (i.e., screening recommendation at a clinic visit) Participants receiving the high intensity intervention are expected to have a 20% increase in screening uptake while those receiving medium intensity intervention will have a 10% increase in screening uptake over those receiving usual care. The study will also measure MT-sDNA sample quality and neoplastic yield in these remote Alaska Native communities. The investigators anticipate that the proportion of MT-sDNA tests meeting quality control standards will be the same as in the general US population (96%) and that pre-cancerous polyp detection rates at diagnostic post-MT-sDNA colonoscopy will exceed routine clinical practice rates in the general US population (52%-67%). During and following the graded intensity intervention, the investigators will survey samples of patients to evaluate their awareness and response to the CRC screening intervention. The investigators will assess their perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy relevant to CRC screening as well as measure the time-to-respond and screening method used. The study will use focus groups and key informant interviews to learn about factors associated with screening response. For the focus groups, AN people ages 45-75 who are unscreened or non-adherent to screening guidelines (colonoscopy within 10 years, sigmoidoscopy within five years, or fecal occult blood testing within preceding 12 months) will be invited to provide their views on barriers to and facilitators of screening, including barriers described in the literature and identified in the investigators previous work. Non-adherence will be identified through tribal medical records. Each focus group will last up to two hours, and will include 6-8 participants. All focus groups will be stratified by gender, and focus groups will be balanced so that approximately equal numbers of men and women are included in the analysis. The investigators will also conduct a brief survey and key informant interviews (6-8 clinician interviews at each location) among community health aides, providers, and tribal health system administrators using validated measures of intervention feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness to characterize provider- and system-level barriers and promotors to MT-sDNA implementation.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMulti-target stool DNA test

Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTColonoscopy

Cluster randomized trial of high and medium intensity outreach with MT-sDNA or colonoscopy compared with usual care

Sponsors

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Lead SponsorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

3-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Alaska Native adults eligible to receive health care through the Alaska Tribal Health System * Active health system users with at least one Alaska Tribal Health System visit in the previous three years * Due for colorectal cancer screening (have not had colonoscopy in past 10 years or fecal occult blood test in past 1 year or flexible sigmoidoscopy in past 5 years)

Exclusion criteria

* First-degree relative diagnosed with CRC at age 60 or younger * History of familial adenomatous polyposis * Hereditary non-polyposis CRC * Previous colonoscopic evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, colorectal adenomas, or CRC * Known history of colectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm1 yearIncident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)1 yearTest requested (MT-sDNA or colonoscopy) by intervention participants
MT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up1 yearRate of positive MT-sDNA test follow up to diagnostic colonoscopy

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDiana Redwood, PhD

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Intensity
Navigated tribal health worker telephone outreach up to 5 telephone calls and 1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
746
Medium Intensity
1 mailed culturally appropriate educational material describing CRC screening options available and 1 telephone call from a tribal health worker. If MT-sDNA selected, sent a MT-sDNA kit and follow-up reminders.
696
Usual Care
Usual care (i.e., opportunistic screening recommendation at a clinic visit)
587
Total2,029

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh IntensityMedium IntensityUsual CareTotal
Age, Customized
45-54
338 Participants321 Participants311 Participants970 Participants
Age, Customized
55-64
267 Participants242 Participants178 Participants687 Participants
Age, Customized
65-75
141 Participants133 Participants98 Participants372 Participants
CRC screening test requested
Colonoscopy
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
CRC screening test requested
MT-sDNA
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
CRC screening test requested
Unable to contact/Refused
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Alaska Native
746 Participants696 Participants587 Participants2029 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
746 participants696 participants587 participants2029 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
303 Participants274 Participants239 Participants816 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
443 Participants422 Participants348 Participants1213 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 7460 / 6960 / 587
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 7460 / 6960 / 587
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 7460 / 6960 / 587

Outcome results

Primary

Colorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm

Incident CRC screening episode defined as having at least one of the following within 1 year of follow-up after randomization and intervention: colonoscopy; MT-sDNA with a negative result; or MT-sDNA with a positive result followed by a colonoscopy within 1 year.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High IntensityColorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm205 Participants
Medium IntensityColorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm165 Participants
Usual CareColorectal Cancer Screening by Study Arm32 Participants
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [1, 1.5]Chi-squared
p-value: <0.01Chi-squared
Secondary

MT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up

Rate of positive MT-sDNA test follow up to diagnostic colonoscopy

Time frame: 1 year

Population: This measure only includes participants who had an abnormal MT-sDNA test in either the high- and medium-intensity intervention arms and whether they received a follow-up colonoscopy. Usual care arm was not offered MT-sDNA and so is not included in this secondary outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High IntensityMT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up29 Participants
Medium IntensityMT-sDNA Diagnostic Follow-up20 Participants
Secondary

Test Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)

Test requested (MT-sDNA or colonoscopy) by intervention participants

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High IntensityTest Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)MT-sDNA384 Participants
High IntensityTest Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)Colonoscopy155 Participants
Medium IntensityTest Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)MT-sDNA277 Participants
Medium IntensityTest Requested (MT-sDNA or Colonoscopy)Colonoscopy133 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026