Skip to content

Telemedicine for First Trimester Abortion in South Africa

Telemedicine Versus Standard Care for First Trimester Abortion in South Africa: a Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04336358
Enrollment
900
Registered
2020-04-07
Start date
2020-02-27
Completion date
2021-11-15
Last updated
2021-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abortion in First Trimester

Keywords

Telemedicine screening, Eligibility for medical abortion, Improved access

Brief summary

The study aim to determine if medical abortion facilitated by a physician online (s.c. telemedicine), combined with a simplified physical exam, is equally effective, safe and acceptable to women in South Africa as standard medical abortion care.

Detailed description

The proposed study is non-inferiority randomized controlled trial that will investigate the safety, effectiveness and acceptability for women of early medical abortion performed through telemedicine, compared to standard care in South Africa. Standard care, in the Western Cape, includes face to face eligibility screening, counselling and information with a nurse or physician, as well as an ultrasound to confirm the gestational age of the pelvic exam. The intervention will include a pelvic exam and gestatonal age based on LMP assessment and uterine size by bimanual palpation. Eligibility screening, counselling and information will occur through an existing online telemedicine application, content and language-adapted to suit women in South Africa, and managed by a HPCSA certified doctor. The study is a non-inferiority study. Our hypothesis is that the intervention is not inferior to standard care with respect to safety, effectiveness and acceptability. The study is performed to provide an alternate model of abortion care to be applied in settings where abortion is in any way restricted and increase access to safe abortion. Importantly the study is planned for a context where abortion services are legal but restricted by stigma. South Africa therefore provides a uniquely suited setting for this study.

Interventions

OTHERTelemedicine

Telemedicine consultation online

Sponsors

Grand Challenges Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cape Town
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

inferiority randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Able to read and write * Able to speak English, IsiXhosa or Afrikaans * Gestational age \<9 wks 2 days * In possession of a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to medical abortion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of women who took the abortion pills as instructed5 days after abortion consultationProportion of women who successfully followed through with the abortion consultation and took the abortion pills as instructed
Rate of complete abortion.6 weeks after abortion consultationEffectiveness Rate of complete abortion. i.e. terminated pregnancy, without need of surgical or medical intervention or persistent bleeding within 6 weeks of the abortion initiation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of blood transfusion for heavy bleeding5 days after abortion consultationRate of blood transfusion for heavy bleeding during the abortion
Percentage of women visiting emergency hospital visit for abortion-related symptoms5 days after abortion consultationEmergency hospital visit for symptoms related to the abortion within two days of the intake of misoprostol
Proportion of women that were satisfied or very satisfied with their abortion consultation6 weeks after abortion consultationProportion of women that were satisfied or very satisfied with their abortion consultation, telemedicine/standard care
Percentage of women preferring telemedicine to standard care6 weeks after abortion consultationProportion of women selecting telemedicine vs standard care as a preferred option for a hypothetical future abortion
Percentage of women hospitalised for abortion complications5 days after abortion consultationRate of hospitalization for complications to the abortion

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Primary ContactDeborah A CONSTANT, PhD
deborah.constant@uct.ac.za+27722527415
Backup ContactMargit Endler, PhD
margit.endler@gmail.com+27646176477

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026