Skip to content

Comparing the Impact of 2 Different Techniques in Management of Hydrosalpinx on Pregnancy Rates Following ICSI

A Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Versus Hysteroscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion on Pregnancy Rates Following ICSI (Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection) in Infertile Cases of Hydrosalpinx.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04335864
Enrollment
78
Registered
2020-04-06
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2021-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hydrosalpinx

Brief summary

Assessment and comparing pregnancy outcomes in hydrosalpinx patients treated by hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and laparoscopic salpingectomy before ICSI.

Detailed description

Hydrosalpinx has a detrimental effect on the rates of implantation, pregnancy and early pregnancy loss following IVF. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate decreased by 50% in patients with hydrosalpinx. The negative consequences could be due to embryotoxic properties, a decrease in endometrial receptivity, and hydrosalpinx fluid mechanically flushing the embryo from the uterus. Although laparoscopic salpingectomy and laparoscopic proximal ligation increase ongoing pregnancy rates in women with hydrosalpinges, those interventions are invasive and carry anaesthetic and surgical risks, especially in the presence of extensive adhesions, often seen in women with hydrosalpinges. In view of the possible adverse effects of laparoscopic surgery, an alternative less-invasive treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF would be useful. The effectiveness of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion when compared with salpingectomy has not been established. Randomized clinical trials comparing both procedures prior to IVF are lacking. The present study was designed to compare hysteroscopic tubal occlusion and laparoscopic salpingectomy in the treatment of hydrosalpinges prior to IVF. This study hypothesized that in women scheduled for IVF/ICSI hysteroscopic proximal occlusion of hydrosalpinges would be non-inferior to laparoscopic salpingectomy in terms of ongoing pregnancy rates following IVF/ICSI.

Interventions

39 patients with hydrosalpinx will have laparoscopic salpingectomy

PROCEDUREHystroscopic proximal tubal occlusion

39 patients with hydrosalpinx will have hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary or secondary infertility cases * unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx proved by HSG (hystersalpingogram) or by TVUS(transvaginal ultrasound) .

Exclusion criteria

* Uterine factor of infertility * male factor of infertility * preexisting ovarian pathology * Presence of septic focus * medical or surgical conditions that contraindicated pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical pregnancy rate following ICSI14 days after Embryo transferDefined as positive qualitative bhcg(beta human chorionic gonadotropin)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ongoing pregnancy following ICSI8 weeks after Embryo transferDefined as positive fetal heart rate on ultrasound at 8weeks gestation

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026