Skip to content

Influence of Wrap Fixation Technique on the Results of Fundoplication

Influence of Wrap Fixation Technique on the Results of Fundoplication

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04335734
Enrollment
138
Registered
2020-04-06
Start date
2012-11-01
Completion date
2019-05-28
Last updated
2020-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastro Oesophageal Reflux Disease

Keywords

Gastro Oesophageal Reflux Disease, Nissen Fundoplication

Brief summary

Patients who underwent anti-reflux surgery were divided into two groups. In the I group Nissen fundoplication was supplemented with suturing wrap to the crura or the body of stomach using two non-absorbable stitches on each side. Control group included patients who underwent classic Nissen fundoplication without wrap fixation. All patients were assessed before and after surgery using validated symptoms and quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaires, 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and barium-swallow.

Interventions

PROCEDURENissen Fundoplication with wrap fixation

Firstly, we performed left crural dissection, division of the short gastric vessels, right crural dissection, and esophageal mobilization. Then repair of HH were made by simple cruroraphy if the size of the defect was less then 10 сm² otherwise mesh for reinforcement of cruroraphy was used. Creation of the wrap was made by passing posterior fundus behind the esophagus from left to right, followed by stitching the edges of the stomach with three interrupted sutures. Wrap was fixated to both diaphragmatic crura or to the body of stomach using two non-absorbable stitches on each side.

PROCEDURENissen Fundoplication without wrap fixation

Firstly, we performed left crural dissection, division of the short gastric vessels, right crural dissection, and esophageal mobilization. Then repair of HH were made by simple cruroraphy if the size of the defect was less then 10 сm² otherwise mesh for reinforcement of cruroraphy was used. Creation of the wrap was made by passing posterior fundus behind the esophagus from left to right, followed by stitching the edges of the stomach with three interrupted sutures.

Sponsors

Grubnik Volodymyr
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 20 - 80 years; * Gastroesophageal reflux disease as evidence by gastroscopy and pH-monitoring; * HH type I, II

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 20 years and \> 80 years; * Unable to undergo laparoscopic fundoplication due to: severe comorbidities (ASA III and more), previous major surgery with severe adhesions, etc.; * HH type III, IV; * BMI \< 16 and \> 45 kg/m²; * Pregnancy (in females); * Oesophageal motility disorders; * Oesophageal peptic strictures; * Oesophageal diverticula, other types (i.e. non-reflux) of chronic esophagitis, connective tissue disorders (e.g. scleroderma); * History of oesophageal/gastric/duodenal surgery including vagotomy; * Relapsing course of ulcer disease/hyperacid gastritis including complicated by delayed gastric/duodenal emptying

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence rate of hiatal hernia60 monthsRecurrence of hiatal hernia will be assessed by barium contrast swallow study
Slipped wrap60 monthsSlipped wrap will be assessed by barium contrast swallow study

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life and satisfaction60 monthsQuality of life and satisfaction will be assessed by Gastroesophageal reflux disease - health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score. The scale has 11 items,each item is scored from 0 to 5. A higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026