Skip to content

Assessing Acceptability, Cost, and Efficacy of STELLA-Support Via Technology

Assessing Acceptability, Cost, and Efficacy of STELLA-Support Via Technology: Living and Learning With Advancing AD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04335110
Acronym
STELLA
Enrollment
28
Registered
2020-04-06
Start date
2021-03-24
Completion date
2023-06-15
Last updated
2024-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Caregiver Burnout, Dementia, Family Members

Brief summary

STELLA (Support via Technology Living and Learning with Advancing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias) is a multicomponent video-conference based intervention that aims to help family members caring for persons of dementia as well the person with dementia. The goal of this intervention is to reduce upsetting behaviors and care partner burden. Caring for a family member with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD) can come with many burdens that affect not only the care partners' physical and psychological health but also barriers to access. Due to factors such as distance and cost, Internet-based interventions like STELLA are a great alternative to in-person interventions because it can still address the specific needs of families living with dementia. The hypothesis of this study is that care partners will show significant improvements in burden and depression following the intervention. STELLA is also designed to facilitate effective management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). To accomplish this, up to 40 care partners and their 40 care recipients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias will participate in an 8-week intervention with the support of a Guide (e.g. nurse or social worker). However, the primary focus of this study is on care partners. With the support of a Guide, care partners will identify strategies to address upsetting behaviors in the moderate to late stages of dementia. More specifically, a Guide will help care partners identify and modify distressing behavioral symptoms of dementia. Based on quantitative and qualitative approaches, the effect of the intervention on care partner affective symptoms, including depression and burden, as well as quality of life for both the care partner and the person with dementia will be assessed.

Detailed description

Introduction and Specific Aims: Family members who care for those with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) may find a sense of meaning, opportunity and power in their evolving role, but they may also find the experience burdensome, leading to depression, anxiety and grief. Caregiving can also have negative effects on health, including impairments in cardiovascular health, immune function, restorative sleep and cognitive function. As care demands build over the long duration of disease, the quality of life for the care dyad (the person with dementia, (PwD) and their care partner (CP)) is affected and the risk of placement for the PwD increases. Interventions that reduce the CP affective and physical burden, and delay PwD placement are available to support the 16 million ADRD CPs in the United States, but access to them is limited by a number of factors, including geographic distance, financial resources and stigma. Internet-based videoconferencing technology (also known as telehealth) is making education and support interventions more accessible for families living with ADRD. These interventions have had small to moderate effects on reducing CP burden and depression and good consumer acceptance. However, despite evidence that CPs prefer individualized interventions with real-time counselors, most telehealth interventions are group-based, automated and not tailored to stages of disease. Also, while the telehealth interventions target important aspects of the CP affective experience (burden, depression), few address sleep issues or the cognitive dysfunction that can result from caregiving. Further, limited information is available about the mechanisms of action of these technology-based interventions. To address the need for personalized, real-time educational interventions for families caring for those in moderate to late-stage dementia, we designed Tele-STELLA (Support via TEchnology: Living and Learning with ADRD). Tele-STELLA uses videoconferencing to connect nurse consultants with CPs, in both one-to-one and then small group sessions. STELLA uses cognitive behavioral techniques to guide CPs in strategies to reduce the emotional, cognitive and physical effects of upsetting behavioral symptoms of dementia. Pilot testing of STELLA prototypes found that the intervention reduced burden. Focus groups revealed that CPs liked the one-to-one telehealth format, but did not like the abrupt cessation after completing the 8 weekly sessions. They asked for opportunities to connect with other caregivers to sustain support. There are few known telehealth interventions that use combined one-to-one and group sessions. This novel study, co-developed with CPs, will provide feasibility and efficacy data and help understand the mechanisms of change for this intervention. Further, this study will be one of the first to use objective data from the ORCASTRAIT LL to learn about Tele-STELLA's mechanisms of behavior change. Phase 1 assesses the STELLA intervention, Phase 2 assesses costs and the effect of the intervention on costs. Phase 1 1. Using quantitative and qualitative approaches, assess feasibility and participant acceptability of (a) STELLA, and (b) the assessment methods (subjective measures and unobtrusive objective monitoring). 2. Using quantitative strategies, assess the preliminary effect of STELLA on (a) the affective impact of caregiving, Care Partner cognitive function and person with dementia quality of life, and on (b) Care Partner and person with dementia objective digital behavioral biomarkers (activity, sleep and time together). 3. Test the feasibility of employing digital behavioral biomarker data, combined with qualitative Care Partner feedback, to assess mechanisms of behavior change before, during and after the STELLA intervention. Phase 2 1. Quantify the costs of delivering the STELLA intervention. 2. Quantify the cost efficacy of STELLA in relation to BPSD frequency and CP reactivity and assess the relationship between costs, BPSD, and care partner burden. H1: There is a relationship between BPSD and cost: More BPSD behaviors and more CP reactivity to the BPSD are associated with higher out-of-pocket and implicit costs for families living with dementia. H2: There is a relationship between out-of-pocket and implicit costs and objective measures of burden identified in the ORCASTRAIT Living Lab continuous home assessment. Higher objective burden will correlate with higher implicit and out-of-pocket costs. STELLA is an ancillary study embedded in the Oregon Roybal Center for CAre Support Translational Research Advantaged by Integrating Technology (ORCASTRAIT) parent study (IRB#20236). THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND MECHANISMS OF ACTION: Tele-STELLA is framed by Vitaliano et al's model which hypothesizes that CP stress exposure catalyzes a cascade of concerns, including psychological, physiological and cognitive strain. The original model places the caregiver at the top of the model as the recipient of a stressor. However, the PwD also experiences stressors, such as CP disengagement. Thus, we include the PwD, who is also vulnerable to the stress of caregiving, at the top of the model. By addressing behavioral symptoms in both the CP and the PwD, it is hypothesized that Tele-STELLA will be feasible and acceptable to families, will reduce the negative effects of ADRD on the family, and that objective feedback (provided by digital biomarker data) will inform the efficacy of the intervention and the mechanisms of behavior change. Significance Providing care for a family member with Alzheimer's disease or a related dementia (ADRD) is both rewarding and risky. CPs exposed to chronic stress, often over years, are susceptible to physical and psychological ailments. In addition, the caregiving experience increases the risk of cognitive impairment in CPs, with spousal CPs being particularly vulnerable, thus potentially perpetuating a cycle when yet another family member has to care for the former CP. Effective interventions that reduce caregiver burden and reduce health risks are available, but various factors impede CP participation, including distance, cost, behavioral symptoms of dementia, stigma and social anxiety. Recognizing the need to reduce barriers to access, scientists have turned to Internet-based interventions. Recent research indicates that multi-component technology-facilitated interventions which allow CP engagement with health professionals are effective and favored by caregivers. However, only a minority of studies allow for health professional engagement, and of these, only a handful provide real-time interaction. Hopwood et al concluded that, despite the fact that family needs vary across ADRD stages, the interventions reviewed were not targeted to a specific stage of ADRD. We have completed two pilot studies using Internet-based CP interventions. These studies tested the feasibility and consumer acceptability of the evidence-based, Staff Training in Assisted-living Residences - Caregivers (STAR-C) intervention, the precursor to Tele-STELLA, when delivered via telehealth. Qualitative data revealed the telehealth intervention was acceptable to CPs and preferred over a potential in-home (live) intervention. We found that burden was reduced, but depression was not. This may be because the interaction with the nurse consultant formally ended with the concluding Session 8, leaving CPs with a sense of isolation, as this CP commented: I went through withdrawals… I wanted to call her (the nurse consultant)-who can I turn to? The prototype interventions did not include meaningful opportunities for CPs to interact with each other post-intervention. CPs felt their support vanished and did not like the fact that it was over. Participants advised that future interventions should include both one-to-one sessions and one-to-multiple sessions. Based on the qualitative and quantitative data from the pilot work Tele-STELLA was designed to address the specific needs of families living with dementia. Tele-STELLA is a multi-component, tailored intervention that begins with one-to-one sessions with each CP and nurse consultant, then links CPs to each other in a meaningful way to sustain support post intervention. Tele-STELLA is designed for families living in the later stages of dementia, where behavioral symptoms are more prominent and distressing for all. Innovation This pilot is innovative in several ways. First, we are testing a new intervention format (blended one-to-one and one-to three) using an online environment (Internet-based videoconferencing technology). Second, we are examining novel strategies for assessing the effect of the intervention and mechanisms of action using unobtrusive, objective monitoring of digital behavioral biomarkers (sleep, time together, activity). Finally, we are collecting data (saved video and audio files) that can be used for future objective assessment of dyad well-being, such as assessing conversational dynamics through linguistic analysis of session interactions or employing facial recognition techniques to assess CP emotions. Taken together, this pilot will set the stage to advance caregiving science beyond traditional, earthbound approaches.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSTELLA (Support via TEchnology: Living and Learning with Advancing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias)

STELLA consists of 8 sessions: 4 sessions one-to-one, with the Care Partner and a Guide, and then 4 sessions with one Guide with up to four Care Partners (total small group will include as few as two and as many as 4 Care Partners) Each weekly session takes about 1 hour. The first four sessions allow for development of the Care Partner-Guide working relationship. In these sessions, the Care Partners identify behaviors (both the person with dementia's and the Care Partner's) which are upsetting to the family. Care Partners will be taught to use an Activator, Behavior, Consequence (ABC) approach to identify activators of behaviors, the behaviors, and consequences of the behaviors. After they identify the ABCs, they will develop a plan to address the behavior and then test it. After the four one-to-one sessions, Care Partners will meet in small groups with a Guide. Effective communication strategies, engagement in pleasant events, and coping will be addressed.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Care Recipient Inclusion: * Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), moderate to late stages * Exhibits 2 or more behaviors listed on Revised Memory and Behavioral Problems (RMBP) that are bothersome to the Care Partner and occur 3 or more times/week at study enrollment * Family member of Care Partner (this can be a relative, spouse or close kin that is considered family) Care Recipient Exclusion: * Dementia not related to ADRD * Unable to leave Care Partner during Care Partner training * Early stage dementia, as defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) of about 15/30 or higher. Care Partner Inclusion: * Adult caring for family member with ADRD * Lives with care recipient OR spends at least 4 hours/week with care recipient * Age of 18 years or older * Speak English * Own a computer/device with a reliable internet connection and compatible operating system Care Partner Exclusion: * Unable to find activity for care recipient during training which would allow Care Partner to work privately, one-on-one during training * Completed similar telehealth intervention within the last year * Hearing and vision problems severe enough to prevent participation * Unwilling or unable to adequately follow study instructions and participate in study procedures Inclusion for Care Recipient and Care Partner: Participate in Oregon Roybal Center for CAre Support Translational Research Advantaged by Integrating Technology (ORCASTRAIT) (IRB#20236) Participant in the ORCASTRAIT study (IRB # 20236)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Revised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistThe RMBPC is assessed 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)Care recipient frequency of behaviors and caregiver reactions to behavioral symptoms. The scale measures how often a behavior occurs (Frequency, F) and how much the caregiver reacts to it (Reactivity, R). Range for both scales is 0-96, lower scores are better. Subscales are not combined.
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)Caregiver depression symptoms, Range 0-30, lower scores indicate less depression (better). Depression is only measured for the caregivers, not the care recipients with dementia (only 1 group)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and Participant AcceptabilityMeasured only once by caregivers 1 week after 8-week interventionMeasures how much participants find the intervention acceptable and feasible. This only applies to caregivers.
Desire to Institutionalize (DTI) ScaleMeasured at study entry onlyCare partner intention to place person with dementia in care facility. This only applies to caregivers.
Sleep DurationMeasures sleep from enrollment to study end. Mean sleep hours one week prior to intervention (pre) and one week after intervention (post). Measured in hours (units on a scale)Digital behavioral biomarker for effective impact of care on care partner sleep. Measured via electronic sleep mat
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) Scale1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)Quality of life for participants, both for caregivers and persons with dementia. The measure consists of 13 items, rated on a four point scale, with 1 being poor and 4 being excellent. Total scores range from 13 to 52, higher scores are better
Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)Caregiver anticipatory grief. Range is 0-90. Higher scores indicate worse grief. This only applies to the caregivers.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Administrative delays and COVID interference caused substantial delays in enrollment. Further enrollment required initial enrollment in the parent study, thus limiting recruitment pool. Recruitment started in Winter 2021, ending in Spring 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned to care partner group (intervention) or care recipient (no intervention). The majority of participants that were referred to STELLA from ORCASTRAIT were eligible for the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Care Partners for persons with dementia
14
Care Recipients
Care recipients
14
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCare RecipientsTotalIntervention
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Age, Continuous76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants28 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants14 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 143 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 143 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 143 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

Caregiver depression symptoms, Range 0-30, lower scores indicate less depression (better). Depression is only measured for the caregivers, not the care recipients with dementia (only 1 group)

Time frame: 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)

Population: 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression ScaleCESD Pre9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
InterventionCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression ScaleCESD Post9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Primary

Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist

Care recipient frequency of behaviors and caregiver reactions to behavioral symptoms. The scale measures how often a behavior occurs (Frequency, F) and how much the caregiver reacts to it (Reactivity, R). Range for both scales is 0-96, lower scores are better. Subscales are not combined.

Time frame: The RMBPC is assessed 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)

Population: Pre/post intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMPBC, F PreNA units on a scale
InterventionRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, F, Post RMBPC, F, postNA units on a scale
InterventionRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, R, Pre27.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
InterventionRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, R, Post24.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Care RecipientsRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, R, PostNA units on a scale
Care RecipientsRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMPBC, F Pre41.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Care RecipientsRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, R, PreNA units on a scale
Care RecipientsRevised Memory and Behavior Problems ChecklistRMBPC, F, Post RMBPC, F, post39.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Secondary

Desire to Institutionalize (DTI) Scale

Care partner intention to place person with dementia in care facility. This only applies to caregivers.

Time frame: Measured at study entry only

Population: Assesses caregivers desire to place person with dementia

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionDesire to Institutionalize (DTI) Scalevery Likely1 Participants
InterventionDesire to Institutionalize (DTI) ScaleNot likely11 Participants
InterventionDesire to Institutionalize (DTI) ScalePossibly1 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility and Participant Acceptability

Measures how much participants find the intervention acceptable and feasible. This only applies to caregivers.

Time frame: Measured only once by caregivers 1 week after 8-week intervention

Population: This is only for the caregivers (one group)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityIt was easy for me to attend STELLA Visits12 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityI could talk with the STELLA Guide easily and openly13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityI feel confident that I can use STELLA skills ot manage upsetting behaviors13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityI felt my privacy was respected during the STELLA visits13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityI felt comfortable discussing sensitive topics with my Guide13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityComfortable talking with other participants13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityEasy to find activity for Care recipient11 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityGood Technical support13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityCould see and hear others12 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityEasy to connect12 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityLiked working with other CPs13 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityPrefer 1:1 for 8 weeks (no group)1 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityPrefer group2 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityCurrent format10 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityPrefer in-person5 participants
InterventionFeasibility and Participant AcceptabilityPrefer video format8 participants
Secondary

Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index

Caregiver anticipatory grief. Range is 0-90. Higher scores indicate worse grief. This only applies to the caregivers.

Time frame: 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)

Population: The MMCGI is only for caregivers (one group). This scale was not used with persons with dementia.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionMarwit Meuser Caregiver Grief IndexPre intervention60.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
InterventionMarwit Meuser Caregiver Grief IndexPost intervention58.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Secondary

Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) Scale

Quality of life for participants, both for caregivers and persons with dementia. The measure consists of 13 items, rated on a four point scale, with 1 being poor and 4 being excellent. Total scores range from 13 to 52, higher scores are better

Time frame: 1 week prior to the 8-week intervention (pre), then 1 week after the intervention (post)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionQuality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) ScaleQoL Pre37.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
InterventionQuality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) ScaleQoL Post35.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Care RecipientsQuality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) ScaleQoL Pre33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Care RecipientsQuality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) ScaleQoL Post34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

Sleep Duration

Digital behavioral biomarker for effective impact of care on care partner sleep. Measured via electronic sleep mat

Time frame: Measures sleep from enrollment to study end. Mean sleep hours one week prior to intervention (pre) and one week after intervention (post). Measured in hours (units on a scale)

Population: sleep duration

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionSleep Durationpre intervention7.9 hoursStandard Deviation 1.5
InterventionSleep Durationpost intervention7.8 hoursStandard Deviation 1.8
Care RecipientsSleep Durationpre intervention8.9 hoursStandard Deviation 1.8
Care RecipientsSleep Durationpost intervention9.2 hoursStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026