Skip to content

The Discriminative Ability of the Four Balance Measures for Fall History

The Discriminative Ability of the Four Balance Measures for.the Previous Fall Experience in Türkish Community-dwelling Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04334746
Enrollment
351
Registered
2020-04-06
Start date
2020-10-06
Completion date
2021-02-15
Last updated
2022-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance; Distorted, Fall, Older People--Abuse of

Brief summary

The fall rate is increased parallel to the aging process. The early determination and management of falls in older adults are quite crucial to preserve the independence of older adults. In the literature, there are used many measurement tools for predicting fall status. The discriminative ability of these measures is important for the accuracy of the assessment. In this study, four of the most commonly used balance measurement tools will be investigated in terms of the discriminative ability for fall status in the Turkish community-dwelling older adults.

Interventions

OTHERBalance measurement tools

Timed Up and Go Test Functional Reach Test One-leg Stance Test Berg Balance Scale

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
CollaboratorOTHER
Giresun University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ordu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* being aged 65 or above, * having a score of 21 or more from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) \[20,23\], * able to ambulate independently or with an assistive device.

Exclusion criteria

* having visual and hearing problems that may cause restrictions in communication and also balance impairments, * drug use (benzodiazepine, psychotropic drugs, etc.) with adverse effects on balance and walking, * having any serious neurological, cardiopulmonary, or orthopedic disorders that adversely affected balance conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fall History2 minutesHistory of fallings will be determined through a question: How many times have you fallen in the past year?. According to the participants' answers, the participants will be categorized into two groups: fallers (one or more fall events) and non-fallers (no falls).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
One-leg Stance test1 minuteThe static balance ability will be determined by one-leg stance test. The participants will be asked to stand on her/his dominant leg as long as possible. The standing time will be recorded with a stopwatch in seconds. Higher times indicate the better balance.
Berg Balance Scale20 minutesThis scale will be used to evaluate the balance ability. It consists 14 items which are scored from 0 to 4, for a total score of 56 points possible. Higher scores indicate better balance performance.
Timed Up and Go Test3 minutesIn this test, participants will be asked to stand from a chair, walk 3 meters (to a line on the floor), turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit back down. Participants are instructed to walk at a comfortable and safe pace during the Timed Up and Go Test. The participant's score is the time it takes to complete the mentioned test. Lower scores indicate better balance performance.
Functional Reach Test2 minutesFunctional reach will be measured by using a leveled yardstick attached to the wall at the height of the participant's right acromion. To measure the participant's reaching distance, an examiner should stand 4 feet away from the yardstick and should be record the initial and end reach positions. Participant should stand in a relaxed position with feet approximately shoulder-width apart, made a loose fist, and, without touching the wall, placed the right arm parallel to the yardstick (initial position). Participants then will be asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (end position). The position of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will be recorded at both the initial and end positions. All subjects will be supervised during the test to ensure safety. The mean difference between the initial position and the end position will be calculated as the functional reach score in centimeters. The higher score indicates

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026