Skip to content

Dual Mobility Cup: Does it Improve Patient's Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplastry?

Principal Investigator

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04333316
Enrollment
180
Registered
2020-04-03
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2020-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Osteoarthritis, Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

hip arthroplasty, satisfaction, dual mobility cup

Brief summary

Although the success of total hip arthroplasty, many patients were dissatisfied postoperatively. Patient's reported outcome measures become of a great importance in assessment of the results after joint replacement. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate and compare postoperative patient's satisfaction after implantation of two commonly used different designs of total hip arthroplasty.

Detailed description

The investigators conducted a prospective comparative study carried out on 180 patients suffering of hip arthritis between 2011 and 2018. They were randomized into two groups of homogenous demographic and clinical data. Group A was treated by cementless T.H.A. with a large head while group B received cementless T.H.A. with a dual mobility cup. Clinical evaluation and preoperative patient's expectation were assessed and compared to the postoperative satisfaction.

Interventions

PROCEDURElarge head

implantation of large head total hip

implantation of dual mobility total hip

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is prospective study was carried out on 180 patients with a unilateral arthritic hip between January 2011 and August 2018. Patients were divided into two groups, each group included 90 patients. Group A included patients received total hip with a large head (32-36mm.) made of cobalt-chrome. The femoral component was a cementless porous coated stem. The cup was a cementless porous coated Trilogy cup and was inserted press fit with primary additional one to three screws. Group B included those received total hip with a dual mobility cup

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral hip arthritis * Age up to 65 years * Body mass index (BMI) up to 35 * Modified Charnley comorbidity classification equal to A

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological deficit (e.g. Parkinsonism, stroke) * Bone type c not fit for cementless fixation * Poly-arthritis, active inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) * Any patient with psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient's satisfactionabout 5 yearsmeasurement by patient's reported outcomes measures
clinical evaluationabout 5 yearsWOMAC score
pain assessmentabout 5 yearsVAS score

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026