Skip to content

Shockwave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis RCT

Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis With Radial Shockwave Therapy vs. Focused Shockwave Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04332471
Enrollment
114
Registered
2020-04-02
Start date
2020-06-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fascitis

Brief summary

Inflammation of the plantar fascia is known as plantar fasciitis and is commonly seen in active or overweight individuals. It can be treated via conservative or surgical therapies. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has shown promise in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Several studies have compared the effects of different types of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (radial and focused) with other forms of conservative treatment in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. No study has yet compared the effect of radial vs. focused shockwave therapy on pain in this population.

Detailed description

Plantar fasciitis is a common foot problem that affects 3.8 per 1,000 persons in the United States. It is characterized by inflammation of the plantar fascia, a fibrous tissue which connects the calcaneus to the metatarsal heads, and is often seen in individuals who are overweight and/or participate frequently in weight-bearing endurance activities such as running. Pain is typically at its highest during the first steps in the morning, although it can also occur with prolonged weightbearing. Plantar fasciitis can be treated via conservative or surgical measures, although surgery is considered as the last resort. In recent years, extracorporeal shockwave therapy has emerged as an alternative conservative method for treating plantar fasciitis. There are two types -- radial and focused shockwave therapy. Focused therapy creates deeper-penetrating, higher-energy shockwaves, whereas radial therapy produces more superficial shockwaves that can treat a wider area of pathology. Randomized controlled trials have compared focused and radial shockwave therapy to placebo and other conservative measures in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis and overall demonstrated benefit. Only one study has directly compared radial and focused shockwave therapy in this population, although pain was not an outcome of focus in the study. The current study aims to collect patient-reported outcomes on both pain and function following radial vs. focused shockwave therapy vs. control therapy.

Interventions

Target intensity will be within a range of 3.5-5.0 bar at maximum Hz, titrated up to patient tolerance within 100 pulses. Total of 3000 pulses.

Target intensity will be within a range of 0.15-0.25 mJ/mm2 at maximum Hz, titrated up to patient tolerance within 100 pulses. Total of 3000 pulses.

DEVICEShockwave therapy device

The shockwave therapy device will be used to administer either radial or focused shockwave therapy.

Stretching and ice massage

Sponsors

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis (\>3 months) that has been recalcitrant to other treatments * Minimum VAS pain of 40/100 (4/10; morning pain when taking first steps, pain after prolonged walking/standing) * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Cortisone injection within the past 3 months * Platelet-rich plasma injection within the past 6 months * History of previous foot surgery * Bilateral heel pain * Coagulopathies or use of anti-coagulants * Local and systemic neurologic or vascular insufficiencies * Rheumatologic disorders * Systemic inflammatory disorders * Active or chronic infection in the area * Lower extremity bone disorders (e.g., Paget's disease, osteomyelitis) * Calcaneal fractures * Nerve entrapment * Ruptures in tendon * Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scale pain - morningUp to 1 yearMorning pain. This will be assessed on a scale of 0-100, with a higher score representing more pain.
Visual analog scale pain - after prolonged walking or standingUp to 1 yearPain after prolonged walking or standing. This will be assessed on a scale of 0-100, with a higher score representing more pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS Physical Function computer adaptive test scoreUp to 1 yearThis computer adaptive questionnaire assesses physical function. A higher score represents higher function. A score of 50 represents the population average.
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Up to 1 yearThe FAOS assess pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports, and quality of life related to foot and ankle pain. This will be assessed on a scale of 0-100, where 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems.
Treatment satisfactionUp to 1 yearSatisfaction with the assigned treatment will be determined on a 0-10 scale, with 10 being most satisfied and 0 being least satisfied.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristina Quirolgico, MD

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 29, 2026