Skip to content

Sargramostim in Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 (SARPAC)

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Interventional Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Sargramostim (Leukine®) in Improving Oxygenation and Short- and Long-term Outcome of COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease) Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04326920
Acronym
SARPAC
Enrollment
87
Registered
2020-03-30
Start date
2020-03-24
Completion date
2021-02-26
Last updated
2022-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Keywords

GM-CSF, Acute Lung Injury, Hypoxia, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Corona virus, COVID-19, SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), Alveolar Macrophage, Acute Hypoxic respiratory failure

Brief summary

Phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of additional inhaled sargramostim (GM-CSF) versus standard of care on blood oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 coronavirus infection and acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Detailed description

Leukine® is a yeast-derived recombinant humanized granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF, sargramostim) and the only FDA approved GM-CSF. GMCSF, a pleiotropic cytokine, is an important leukocyte growth factor known to play a key role in hematopoiesis, effecting the growth and maturation of multiple cell lineages as well as the functional activities of these cells in antigen presentation and cell mediated immunity. Leukine inhalation or intravenous administration, as an adjuvant therapy, may confer benefit to patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. While there is no active IND (Investigational New Drug) for Leukine in the proposed patient population, Leukine is being studied in Fase II as an adjuvant therapy in the management of life-threatening infections to boost the hosts innate immune response to fight infection, reduce the risk of secondary infection, and in varied conditions as prevention of infection during critical illness. Inhaled Leukine has also been successfully used as primary therapy to improve oxygenation in patients with disordered gas exchange in the lungs. We propose that based on preclinical and clinical data, Leukine inhalation, as an adjuvant therapy, has an acceptable benefit-risk for use in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure and ARDS due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. Confirmed COVID19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2) will be randomized to receive sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care, or to receive standard of care treatment. Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment. In the control group progressive disease requiring mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area for 5 days. Safety data, including blood leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. Efficacy data will also be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation parameters, need for ventilation, lung compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin levels, etc. as well as occurrence of secondary bacterial infections.

Interventions

DRUGSargramostim

Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration

OTHERControl

Standard of care

Sponsors

Flemish institute of biotechnology (VIB)
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recent (≤2weeks prior to Randomization) confident diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by antigen detection and/or PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), and/or seroconversion or any other emerging and validated diagnostic test * In some patients, it may be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because viral load is low and/or problems with diagnostic sensitivity. In those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with highly suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (\<24h) chest-CT scan (confirmed by a radiologist and pulmonary physician as probable COVID-19), a patient can be enrolled as probable COVID-19 infected. In all cases, this needs confirmation by later seroconversion. * Presence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure defined as (either or both) * saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 * PaO2/FiO2 below 300 * Admitted to specialized COVID-19 ward * Age 18-80 * Male or Female * Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with known history of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor such as sargramostim, yeast-derived products, or any component of the product. * mechanical ventilation before start of study * patients with peripheral white blood cell count above 25.000 per microliter and/or active myeloid malignancy * patients on high dose systemic steroids (\> 20 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent) * patients on lithium carbonate therapy * Patients enrolled in another investigational drug study * Pregnant or breastfeeding females (all female subjects regardless of childbearing potential status must have negative pregnancy test at screening) * Patients with serum ferritin \>2000 mcg/ml (which will exclude ongoing HLH)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Oxygenationon Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came firstMean Change from Baseline in PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Days in Hospitalthrough study completion, an average of 5 months
Number of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)during hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Deathat 28 days
Number of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDSduring hospital admission (up to 28 days)
Time to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24hDuring hospital admission (up to 28 days)Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome
Change in Clinical Sign Scoreat baseline, at day 6Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Change in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Scoreat baseline, at day 6The NEWS2 score standardises the assessment and response to acute illness. Six physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new confusion, temperature. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk
Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvementat Baseline, at Day 6The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) ; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome
Change in Ferritin Levelat baseline, at day 6
Change in D-dimer Levelat baseline, at day 6
Change in CRP Levelat baseline, at day 6
Change in Lymphocyte Countat baseline, at day 6
Change in Eosinophil Countat baseline, at day 6
HRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Scoreat follow-up, 10-20 weeks after day 10 or discharge, whichever comes firstThe HRCT fibrosis score is a subjective assessment of the overall extent of normal attenuation, reticular abnormalities, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis . The HRCT findings are graded on a scale of 1-4 based on the classification system: 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing. The presence of each of the above four HRCT findings is assessed independently in three (upper, middle and lower) zones of each lung. The extent of each HRCT finding was determined by visually estimating the percentage (to the nearest 5%) of parenchymal involvement in each zone. The score for each zone was calculated by multiplying the percentage of the area by the grading scale score (i.e. 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing). The six zone scores were averaged to determine the total score for each patient. The score ranges from 100 to 400, higher values represent more fibrosis.
Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)at baseline, at day 6The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

87 patients were screened in the period from 25-mar-2020 till 29-sep-2020. 87 patients were included, 81 patients were randomised, 79 patients completed the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Sargramostim Treatment Group
Inhaled sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days on top of standard of care. Upon progression to ARDS and initiation of mechanical ventilator support within the 5 day period, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment Sargramostim: Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration
40
Control Group
standard of care. Subjects progressing to ARDS and requiring invasive mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, will have the option (clinician's decision) to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily for 5 days Sargramostim: Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration Control: Standard of care
41
Total81

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalActive Sargramostim Treatment GroupControl Group
6-category ordinal scale at baseline
3 Hospitalized, Non Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIMV) or High Flow Oxygen Device (HFOD)
6 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
6-category ordinal scale at baseline
4 Hospitalized, supplemental oxygen
71 Participants38 Participants33 Participants
6-category ordinal scale at baseline
5 Hospitalized, no supplemental oxygen
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants11 Participants15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
55 Participants29 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years59 years60 years
Biomarkers in serum -C5a at baseline9.94 ng/mL11.18 ng/mL8.83 ng/mL
Biomarkers in serum - GM-CSF at baseline9.12 fg/mL9.13 fg/mL9.12 fg/mL
Biomarkers in serum - IL-18 at baseline131.00 pg/mL101.3 pg/mL150.7 pg/mL
Biomarkers in serum - IL1RA at baseline1162 ng/mL839.3 ng/mL1288 ng/mL
Biomarkers in serum - IL-6 at baseline11.54 pg/mL11.47 pg/mL11.54 pg/mL
Biomarkers in serum - IL-8 at baseline23.99 pg/mL22.51 pg/mL27.44 pg/mL
Biomarkers in serum - TNF at baseline14.99 pg/mL16.32 pg/mL14.77 pg/mL
Body Mass Index (BMI) at baseline28.0 kg/m^228.6 kg/m^227.6 kg/m^2
Comorbidity at baseline
Arterial hypertension
14 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Cancer
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Cardiovascular disease
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Chronic kidney disease
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Chronic lung disease
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Diabetes mellitus
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Patients without reported comorbidities
45 Participants22 Participants23 Participants
Comorbidity at baseline
Severe liver disease
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Concomitant medication at randomization
Antibiotics
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Concomitant medication at randomization
Antiviral drugs (Remdesivir)
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Concomitant medication at randomization
Glucocorticoids
20 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Concomitant medication at randomization
Hydroxychloroquine
50 Participants24 Participants26 Participants
Concomitant medication at randomization
Patients without reported concomitant medication
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Days since hospitalization at baseline3.0 days3 days3 days
Days since symptom onset at baseline11.0 day11 day10 day
Lab values - alanine aminotransferase at baseline0.58 ukat/L0.59 ukat/L0.57 ukat/L
Lab values - aspartate aminotransferase at baseline0.65 ukat/L0.62 ukat/L0.65 ukat/L
Lab values - C-reactive protein at baseline74.5 mg/L73.2 mg/L83 mg/L
Lab values - creatinine at baseline77.35 micromol/L75.14 micromol/L78.68 micromol/L
Lab values - D-dimer at baseline3.81 nmol/L4.36 nmol/L3.61 nmol/L
Lab values - eosinophil count at baseline0.02 cells x10^9/L0.01 cells x10^9/L0.02 cells x10^9/L
Lab values - ferritin at baseline721 mcg/L736.5 mcg/L721 mcg/L
Lab values - lactate dehydrogenase at baseline5.26 ukat/L4.98 ukat/L5.98 ukat/L
Lab values - lymphocyte count at baseline1.00 cells x10^9/L1.08 cells x10^9/L0.88 cells x10^9/L
Oxygenation - P(A-a)O2 gradient at baseline47.65 mmHg50.15 mmHg45.55 mmHg
Oxygenation - PaO2/FiO2 ratio at baseline295 ratio291.5 ratio297 ratio
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arabian
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
73 Participants34 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants14 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants26 Participants25 Participants
Smoking status at baseline
Current
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Smoking status at baseline
Former
34 Participants18 Participants16 Participants
Smoking status at baseline
Never
44 Participants22 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 408 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 4020 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 406 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Improvement in Oxygenation

Mean Change from Baseline in PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first

Time frame: on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first

Population: 73 of the 81 patients reached the evaluable primary endpoint. 2 patient discontinued prematurely, 3 patients refused arterial puncture at day 6, 3 patients were excluded because they had a negative P(A-a)O2 gradient at randomization or day 6, signifying an error in FiO2 recording.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupImprovement in Oxygenation25.7 ratioStandard Deviation 85.3
Control GroupImprovement in Oxygenation29.7 ratioStandard Deviation 71.88
Secondary

Change in Clinical Sign Score

Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in Clinical Sign Score-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Control GroupChange in Clinical Sign Score-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change in CRP Level

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in CRP Level-43.6 mg/L
Control GroupChange in CRP Level-43.1 mg/L
Secondary

Change in D-dimer Level

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in D-dimer Level-0.71 nmol/L
Control GroupChange in D-dimer Level-0.44 nmol/L
Secondary

Change in Eosinophil Count

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in Eosinophil Count0.100 *cells* x10^9/L
Control GroupChange in Eosinophil Count0.005 *cells* x10^9/L
Secondary

Change in Ferritin Level

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in Ferritin Level-90 mcg/L
Control GroupChange in Ferritin Level-112 mcg/L
Secondary

Change in Lymphocyte Count

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in Lymphocyte Count0.45 *cells* x10^9/L
Control GroupChange in Lymphocyte Count0.20 *cells* x10^9/L
Secondary

Change in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Score

The NEWS2 score standardises the assessment and response to acute illness. Six physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system: respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new confusion, temperature. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Score-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Control GroupChange in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Score-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupChange in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Control GroupChange in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Death

Time frame: at 28 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupDeath2 Participants
Control GroupDeath2 Participants
Secondary

HRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Score

The HRCT fibrosis score is a subjective assessment of the overall extent of normal attenuation, reticular abnormalities, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis . The HRCT findings are graded on a scale of 1-4 based on the classification system: 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing. The presence of each of the above four HRCT findings is assessed independently in three (upper, middle and lower) zones of each lung. The extent of each HRCT finding was determined by visually estimating the percentage (to the nearest 5%) of parenchymal involvement in each zone. The score for each zone was calculated by multiplying the percentage of the area by the grading scale score (i.e. 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing). The six zone scores were averaged to determine the total score for each patient. The score ranges from 100 to 400, higher values represent more fibrosis.

Time frame: at follow-up, 10-20 weeks after day 10 or discharge, whichever comes first

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupHRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Score100.8 score on a scale
Control GroupHRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Score102.5 score on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement

The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) ; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome

Time frame: at Baseline, at Day 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupMean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Control GroupMean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Number of Days in Hospital

Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupNumber of Days in Hospital8.5 days
Control GroupNumber of Days in Hospital9.0 days
Secondary

Number of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupNumber of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS7 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)

Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupNumber of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)2 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)1 Participants
Secondary

Time to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24h

Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = \<37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = \>39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome

Time frame: During hospital admission (up to 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Active Sargramostim Treatment GroupTime to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24h2.0 Days
Control GroupTime to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24h3.0 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026