Skip to content

Applicaion of Mouth Opener Combined With Electronic Video Laryngoscope in Double-lumen Intubation of Patients With Difficult Airway

Applicaion of Mouth Opener Combined With Electronic Video Laryngoscope in Double-lumen Intubation of Patients With Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04325997
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-03-30
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2019-08-30
Last updated
2020-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Airway Intubation, Double-lumen Tube

Keywords

video laryngoscop, double-lumen tube, mouth gag

Brief summary

How to quickly expose glottis and accurately insert double luminal tracheal tube in patients with difficult airway in thoracoscopic surgery has become an urgent problem in anesthesia induction.This study through the double cavity bronchial tube visual laryngoscope intubation with open mouth and electronic video laryngoscope used in combination, to explore whether can shorten the glottis exposure, improve the success rate of the double lumen tube intubation will reduce pharyngeal damage, reduce intubation hemodynamic fluctuations, in order to improve the glottis appeared difficult patients with bronchial intubation success rate to provide the reference.

Detailed description

A total of 60 patients who needed double-lumen endobronchial catheterization in thoracic department and whose Arne o 'risk index score was at least 7 points were randomly divided into three groups.Group B was intubated with video laryngoscopy.Group C was intubated with a mouth opener for video laryngoscope combined with a double-lumen bronchial tube for video laryngoscope intubation (hereinafter referred to as the mouth opener).The glottis exposure time, bronchial intubation time, intubation times, success rate of one intubation, and NRS score of pharyngeal pain 8 hours after surgery were observed and recorded in the three groups, and the hemodynamic changes after intubation were observed and recorded.

Interventions

DEVICElaryngoscope with mouth opener

Double-lumen tube combined with mouth gag for laryngoscope intubation

DEVICEvideo laryngoscope with mouth opener

Double-lumen tube combined with mouth gag for video laryngoscope intubation

Sponsors

Zhuan Zhang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of early lung cancer * Ages ranged from 30 to 80

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Prediction of difficulty in mask ventilation * Chest X-ray examination of trachea, bronchial anatomical abnormalities or tumor compression caused by trachea/bronchial deformation * Failure of assessing Arne risk index

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glottis exposure timethrough study completion, an average of 1 minute
Bronchial intubation timethrough study completion,an average of 1 minute
The number of intubationthrough study completion,an average of 1 minute
One-time success rate of intubationthrough study completion,an average of 1 minute
Glottic field gradingthrough study completion,an average of 1 minuteCormack-Lehane grading, C-L1:Can see glottis mostly;C-L2:Only the posterior union of the glottis is visible, not the glottis, and at most the cartilago arytaenoidea is visible when the larynx is lightly pressed;C-L3: can't see any part of the glottis, only the epiglottis; C-L4:No part of the larynx can be seen

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026