Skip to content

Decoding Motion Planning Using Cortical Potentials

Decoding Motion Planning Using Cortical Potentials in People With a Transfemoral Amputation and Able-bodied Individuals

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04325516
Enrollment
10
Registered
2020-03-27
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)

Keywords

Amputee, Lower limb, Brain activity, Cortical potentials, Movement intention

Brief summary

The team will investigate the user's intention to move by using cortical activity during a sit to stand movement performance in people with a transfemoral amputation and able-bodied individuals. The goal is to get insights in pre-movement onset indicators within the brain that initiate the sit to stand transfer. The hypothesis is that people with a transfemoral amputation use different brain locations for motion planning compared to able-bodied individuals.

Detailed description

The evolution of lower limb prostheses has made considerable progress in the past decades. There has been a transition from passive (e.g. Total knee®, Össur) to quasi-passive (e.g. C-leg®, Otto Bock) and eventually to active prostheses (e.g. Power knee®, Össur). The development always focused on an amputation as a primary peripheral disorder. For example, manufacturers have been searching to compensate the loss of muscle mass by adding torque into the prosthesis. However, few considerations have yet been taken to the fact that central adaptations are also observed after amputation in terms of neuroplasticity and reorganization. The atypical motion planning strategies of people with a lower limb amputation (LLA) could possibly be related to the challenges that they experience during daily activities, such as the sit to stand transfer. Standing up from a chair is a relevant clinical problem and current devices do not yet relieve the asymmetrical loading. A few studies have already investigated the muscular activity during a sit to stand movement in people with a LLA and able-bodied individuals. The movement is characterized by a forward displacement of the centre of mass with the highest activation of the m. gluteus maximus, m. adductor magnus and m. biceps femoris.The sit to stand transfer is a potential movement to investigate brain activity incorporating the advantages and disadvantages of EEG measurements. Until now, the development of lower limb prostheses approaches people with a LLA as a peripheral disorder whereas relevant central adaptations are also observed. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the cortical activity that is responsible for successfully completing a sit to stand transfer. The hypothesis is that different brain locations are activated in people with a transfemoral amputation for motion planning compared to able-bodied individuals.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDaily activities

Participants will perform four tasks in a randomized order: * sit to stand * dorsi flexion of the foot * knee extension * hip extension

Sponsors

Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 25 - 75 years * Gender: men and women * Level of amputation: unilateral transfemoral * Vascular or traumatic cause of amputation * Medicare Functional Classification Level25: K3-4 * Participants are able to stand up from a chair and return to the seated position without support of their hands for ten repetitions * Participants wear their prosthesis for at least 8 hours/day (Prosthetic use has been shown to have an influence on functional reorganization) * No cognitive impairment. This will be objectified with the mini-mental state examination (score on 30)

Exclusion criteria

* Any neurological disease * No upper limb or bilateral amputation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ElectroEncephalography in millisecondsApproximatley 9 monthsMovement related cortical potential before the actual movement
ElectroMyography activity in millisecondsApproximatley 9 monthsAmplitude
ElectroMyography timingApproximatley 9 monthsTime of movement onset

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the sit to stand testApproximatley 9 monthsDuration of the sit to stand test

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026