Skip to content

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor: a Cross-sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04325256
Enrollment
400
Registered
2020-03-27
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2022-07-15
Last updated
2022-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Brief summary

Induction of labour (IOL) nowadays is a common procedure in obstetric practice. Presently, IOL is done for 20% of pregnancies for various maternal and fetal indications and nearly 20% of labour inductions end up in caesarean deliveries. The success of IOL mainly depends upon favourability of the cervix which is usually assessed by manual examination and Scored as Bishop Score. However, this method is limited by subjectivity and reproducibility and though done in all the patients prior to IOL, several studies have demonstrated poor correlation between Bishop Score and outcome of IOL

Interventions

PROCEDUREManipal ultrasound scoring system

length of the cervix from the internal to external os, presence or absence of funneling and if present width and length of funneling at internal os were measured. Distance between presenting part to external os will be measured and position of the cervix i.e. whether curved or straight will also noted.

PROCEDURELevine scoring system

maternal height, parity, body-mass index (BMI) at delivery and the results of modified Bishop's score in calculation of probability of CS

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE

Inclusion criteria

1. Singleton pregnancy. 2. Pregnant ≥ 37 weeks gestation. 3. Fetus with longitudinal lie and vertex presentation. 4. Intact membranes. 5. No vaginal bleeding.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with previous cesarean delivery. 2. Previous uterine surgery. 3. Antepartum hemorrhage. 4. Cephalopelvic disproportion. 5. Category II or III non-stress test. 6. Malpresentation. 7. Intrauterine fetal death. 8. Fetal growth restriction. 9. Fetuses with major congenital malformations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of successful induction of labor24 hoursan ability to achieve the active phase of labor corresponding to a cervical dilatation of ≥4 cm within 12 h of initiating oxytocin on the first day of induction

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026