Skip to content

Study to See How Well an Eye Drop, SURF-201, Works and What Side Effects There Are in Cataract Surgery Subjects

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked Study To Compare The Ocular Safety, Tolerability, And Efficacy Of A Topical 0.2% Ophthalmic Corticosteroid Solution (SURF-201) To Vehicle In Cataract Surgery Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04324359
Enrollment
91
Registered
2020-03-27
Start date
2020-03-03
Completion date
2020-11-20
Last updated
2025-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-surgical Ocular Inflammation, Post-surgical Ocular Pain

Brief summary

SURF-201 is being studied for the treatment of eye inflammation and pain in people who are undergoing cataract surgery. SURF-201 is an investigational drug (which means the study drug is currently being tested) in the form of a sterile eye drop. The purpose of this research study is to see how well SURF-201 works and what side effects there are, and to compare it with Vehicle (placebo). This study will involve about 80 study participants at several different research sites in the United States.

Interventions

DRUGSURF-201

One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.

DRUGPlacebo

One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.

Sponsors

Surface Ophthalmics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult subjects age 18 years or older scheduled for uncomplicated unilateral cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. 2. Subjects must be able to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF). 3. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to and submit a negative urine pregnancy test before any study-specific procedures are performed. The subjects must be using and continue to use a suitable method of contraception for the duration of the study: spermicide with barrier, oral contraceptive, transdermal contraceptive, injectable or implantable contraceptive, intrauterine device (IUD), abstinence or surgical sterilization of a partner. If a subject is not of childbearing potential (e.g., has been postmenopausal for at least 12 months or is premenarchal, or has undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or a bilateral tubal ligation), a urine pregnancy test and use of a suitable method of contraception for the duration of the study will not be required. 4. Subjects must have a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of at least +1.0 log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (Snellen equivalent of 20/200) in the non-study eye (fellow eye). 5. Subjects must have an intraocular pressure (IOP) of \>8 mmHg and ≤22 mmHg in the study eye (surgery eye). 6. Subject must agree to maintain their current dosing regimen throughout the study period (from Screening through Day 32) if they are currently using topical cyclosporin-A or Xiidra (lifitegrast 5%). 7. Subjects must be willing and able to attend all study visits and follow all instructions. 8. Subjects must be able to self-instill the study drug (if unable, a caregiver must be available to instill all doses of the study drug). 9. Subjects must agree to avoid any medications which are disallowed (as defined by the protocol).

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has any intraocular inflammation (cells and flare in the anterior chamber) or ocular pain (pain score of \>0) in either eye prior to surgery. 2. Subject has any extraocular inflammation in the study eye prior to surgery (blepharitis is allowed if only scurf is present without any concurrent conjunctivitis or lid erythema/edema) or ongoing uveitis. 3. Subject has a history of diabetic retinopathy and/or previous vitrectomy in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening which, in the investigator's opinion, is clinically significant and could impact the normal outcome of an uncomplicated cataract surgery. 4. Subject has a diagnosis of severe dry eye in the study eye. 5. Subject has any sign of iritis or scleritis in the study eye. 6. Subject has a history of glaucoma surgery in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening. 7. Subject has a history of retinal surgery in the study eye within the last 2 years or plans to undergo retinal surgery in the study eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32) 8. Subject has a history of Fuchs' dystrophy in the study eye. 9. Subject has guttata or chalazion in the study eye. 10. Subject has undergone radial keratotomy, photorefractive keratotomy, advanced surface ablation, corneal transplant, or LASIK in the study eye within the last 2 years prior to Screening. 11. Subject plans to undergo cataract surgery in the non-study (fellow) eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32). 12. Subject plans to undergo additional ocular surgery (including femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, astigmatic keratotomy, limbal relaxing incision surgery, mechanical pupillary expanders, conjunctival incisions, and vitrectomy) in either eye during the study period (from Screening through Day 32). 13. Subject has a history of intraocular injections in the study eye within 6 months prior to Screening. 14. Subject has a history of herpes simplex infection in either eye. 15. Subject has active corneal, conjunctival or canalicular pathology (including ocular infection \[bacterial, viral or fungal\]) in the study eye. Specifically, active viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva including epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, and varicella, and also in mycobacterial infection of the eye and fungal diseases of the ocular structures (such as fungal keratitis). 16. Subject has thinning of the cornea or sclera. 17. Subject plans to undergo uncomplicated unilateral cataract surgery with the aid of anterior capsular staining products (e.g., Trypan blue) or with the aid of a femto (femtosecond) laser. 18. Subject has undergone anti-neoplastic therapy within the last 2 years prior to Screening or plans to undergo anti-neoplastic therapy during the study period. 19. Subject has a history of use of medications to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia that, in the opinion of the investigator, limits adequate dilation of the pupil to safely perform uncomplicated cataract removal and IOL implantation. 20. Subject has a history of liver disease within the last 5 years prior to Screening. 21. Subject has a history of previous ocular trauma in the study eye that places the study eye at risk of increased post-surgical complications or inflammation. 22. Subject has or had a known blood dyscrasia or bone marrow suppression. 23. Subject has an active or chronic/recurrent ocular or systemic disease that is not controlled and may have an impact on would healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus, systemic connective tissue disease, severe atopic disease). 24. Subject is suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse. 25. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or poor tolerance to corticosteroids or any component of the study drug or any of the procedural medications such as anesthetic and/or fluorescein drops, dilating drops, etc. 26. Female subjects who are currently pregnant or nursing or are planning to become pregnant during the study or have a positive pregnancy test. 27. Subject has previously participated in this study protocol. 28. Subject used (within 30 days of initiation of study treatment) or is anticipating concurrent use of an investigational drug or device. 29. Subject has a condition or a situation which, in the investigator's opinion, might put the subject at increased risk, confound the study data or interfere significantly with the subject's study participation. 30. Subject would be wearing contact lens in either eye during the dosing period of Day -1 to Day 14. 31. Subject is taking a medication that the investigator feels might interfere with the study parameters. 32. Subject tests positive for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus prior to Visit 1 (Day -14 to Day -2).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0Day 15The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0Day 1Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SURF-201
0.2% topical preservative-free corticosteroid solution (0.2% betamethasone sodium phosphate) SURF-201: One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.
39
Vehicle
Topical preservative-free vehicle (Placebo) Placebo: One drop twice daily (BID) in the study eye for 16 days.
43
Total82

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalVehicleSURF-201
Age, Continuous68.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53
68.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
68.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.82
Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade at Baseline82 Participants43 Participants39 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
74 Participants38 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ocular Pain Score at Baseline82 Participants43 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
64 Participants33 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants25 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants18 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 400 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 4023 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 400 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 0

The Investigator used a slit lamp biomicroscope to assess ACCs in the study (surgery) eye. ACC counts were graded as follows: ACC Grade 0 = 0 cells were seen ACC Grade higher than 0 = 1 or more cells were seen

Time frame: Day 15

Population: Randomized participants who had uncomplicated cataract surgery. Missing values were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).~LOCF is a common statistical approach to the analysis of longitudinal repeated measures where some follow-up (FU) observations may be missing. In a LOCF analysis, a missing FU value is replaced by (imputed as) that participant's previously observed value. The combination of the observed and imputed data is then analyzed as if there were no missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 022 Participants
VehicleAnterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Grade: Number of Participants Achieving an ACC Grade of 09 Participants
p-value: <0.001z-test for proportions
Secondary

Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery and had no missing assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 027 Participants
VehiclePost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 021 Participants
p-value: 0.066Other: z-test for proportions
Secondary

Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame: Day 8

Population: Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery and had no missing assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 032 Participants
VehiclePost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 032 Participants
p-value: 0.716z-test for proportions
Secondary

Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame: Day 15

Population: Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery and had no missing assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 035 Participants
VehiclePost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 033 Participants
p-value: 0.528z-test for proportions
Secondary

Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame: Day 22

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 035 Participants
VehiclePost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 037 Participants
p-value: 0.766z-test for proportions
Secondary

Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 0

Ocular pain was assessed and graded by the participants using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a mark on the 100 mm line (0=absent \[no pain\], 100=maximum \[severe pain\]).

Time frame: Day 32

Population: Randomized participants who underwent routine uncomplicated cataract surgery and had no missing VAS assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SURF-201Post-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 035 Participants
VehiclePost-surgical Ocular Pain Score: Number of Participants Achieving an Ocular Pain Score of 039 Participants
p-value: 0.619z-test for proportions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026