Skip to content

Nasal HFOV Versus Nasal SIPPV in Neonate Following Extubation: RCT Crossover Study

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Versus Synchronized Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonate Following Extubation: Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04323397
Acronym
nHFOnSIPPV
Enrollment
133
Registered
2020-03-26
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High-Frequency Ventilation, Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation, Newborn Morbidity, Noninvasive Ventilation

Keywords

Nasal High-Frequency Oscillation, Nasal Synchronized Intermittent Positive Pressure, Respiratory Failure, Extubation Failure

Brief summary

Mechanical ventilation was introduced to treat respiratory failure in preterm infants or sick neonates then improvements in survival (1,2). However, the complications from short or long term use of ventilation can result in unintended harm or burden (e.g., air leak syndrome, pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neurological injury, retinopathy of prematurity) (3,4). To reduce these risks, clinicians should aggressive extubated neonates as early as possible. Respiratory (focus on blood gas as well as partial pressure CO2 \[pCO2\]) or extubation (focus on clinical condition as well as reintubation) failure was worrisome in pediatrician and parents if the neonate was reintubated owing to complete recovery of lung disease or inadequate respiratory drive. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was supported for primary respiratory support (initial mode before endotracheal intubation) or post-extubation. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) was familiar to NIV mode in neonatal respiratory support. Nowadays, the new NIV modalities are nasal intermittent synchronized positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal high frequency oscillation (nHFO). To increase the likelihood of nCPAP success, other new modalities of NIV may be interesting. From theory, nSIPPV and nHFO combines peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) with synchrony and high-frequency oscillations without synchrony above CPAP, respectively. From meta-analysis, nSIPPV and nHFO were statistically significant superior than nCPAP both respiratory and extubation failure in neonate (5,6). The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of nHFOV and nSIPPV for CO2 clearance and reintubation rate after extubated neonates. The investigators hypothesized that nHFOV mode would improve CO2 clearance better than nSIPPV mode.

Detailed description

The primary outcome (pCO2) was measured by crossover RCT. The secondary outcome (reintubation within 7 days) was measured by paralleled RCT.

Interventions

DEVICENon-invasive ventilation

Intervention nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) and nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) were generated by neonatal ventilators (SLE6000 infant ventilators, United Kingdom) using bi-nasal prongs (RAM cannula, NEOTECH®, USA) or the nasal mask of the same type for both ventilation modes. The size of the prongs was determined by the infant's weight. The largest possible prongs were used, with a snug fit to avoid leakage. Pacifier for preterm and term neonate (Jollypop™, USA) was taken to avoid leakage from the mouth. The disposable ventilator circuit (Fisher & Paykel RT268™, Evaqua Dual Limb Infant Breathing Circuit Kit with Evaqua 2 Technology and Pressure Line, Flow \> 4L/min, New Zealand) was used. The initial NIV setting was (7) described in arm description. (above)

Sponsors

Prince of Songkla University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Crossover Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 1 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Born in hospital and admit in NICU * The first endotracheal intubation and need NIV if extubation * Umbilical arterial catheterization to draw the blood gas * Neonate has not been intervened from another RCT study

Exclusion criteria

* Major congenital anomalies or chromosomal abnormalities * Neuromuscular diseases * Upper respiratory tract abnormalities * Suspected congenital lung diseases or pulmonary hypoplasia * Need for surgery known before the first extubation * Grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage occurring before the first extubation * Palliative care * Parents' decision not to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Partial Pressure CO2 (pCO2) : Data From the Crossover Phase of the Study2 hours after each interventionData from the Crossover Phase of the study: After randomization only in neonate with arterial line, the initial non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was started then blood gas was obtained after 2 hours. The participant was switched to another NIV and blood gas was obtained after 2 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Extubation Failure: Data From the Parallel Phase of the Study.up to 7 days after each interventionData from the Parallel Phase of the study: The participant with and without arterial line was randomized. If The participant with arterial line was randomized to cross-over trial (randomized to NIV, then switched to another NIV for 2 hours, then switched to the first NIV \[parallel trial\]). If The participant without arterial line was randomized to parallel trial. Extubation failure will be defined by reintubation after NIV mode.

Countries

Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 203 neonates were assessed for eligibility

Pre-assignment details

The 133 participants were included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
nHFOV, Then nSIPPV, Then nHFOV
nHFO: flow 8-10 L/minute, frequency 10 Hz, MAP = MAP (before extubation) + 2 or 8 (preterm), 10 (term) cmH2O, dP = 2-3 times of MAP with visible chest oscillations or 25-35 cmH2O, I:E = 1:1, FiO2 = FiO2 (before extubation) + 0.1-0.2 keep targeted SpO2 90-94% Non-invasive ventilation: Intervention nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) and nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) were generated by neonatal ventilators (SLE6000 infant ventilators, United Kingdom) using bi-nasal prongs (RAM cannula, NEOTECH®, USA) or the nasal mask of the same type for both ventilation modes. The size of the prongs was determined by the infant's weight. The largest possible prongs were used, with a snug fit to avoid leakage. Pacifier for preterm and term neonate (Jollypop™, USA) was taken to avoid leakage from the mouth. The disposable ventilator circuit (Fisher & Paykel RT268™, Evaqua Dual Limb Infant Breathing Circuit Kit with Evaqua 2 Technology and Pressure Line, Flow \> 4L/min, New Zealand) was used. The initial NIV setting was (7) described in arm description. (above)
67
nSIPPV, Then nHFOV, Then nSIPPV
nSIPPV: flow 8-10 L/minute, rate 60/minute, PIP = PIP (before extubation) + 2-5 or 20 (preterm), 25 (term) cmH2O, PEEP = 5 cmH2O, IT = 0.5 s, FiO2 = FiO2 (before extubation) + 0.1-0.2 keep targeted SpO2 90-94%. The highest trigger sensitivity avoiding auto triggering was selected. Non-invasive ventilation: Intervention nasal high frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) and nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) were generated by neonatal ventilators (SLE6000 infant ventilators, United Kingdom) using bi-nasal prongs (RAM cannula, NEOTECH®, USA) or the nasal mask of the same type for both ventilation modes. The size of the prongs was determined by the infant's weight. The largest possible prongs were used, with a snug fit to avoid leakage. Pacifier for preterm and term neonate (Jollypop™, USA) was taken to avoid leakage from the mouth. The disposable ventilator circuit (Fisher & Paykel RT268™, Evaqua Dual Limb Infant Breathing Circuit Kit with Evaqua 2 Technology and Pressure Line, Flow \> 4L/min, New Zealand) was used. The initial NIV setting was (7) described in arm description. (above)
66
Total133

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicnHFOV, Then nSIPPV, Then nHFOVnSIPPV, Then nHFOV, Then nSIPPVTotal
Age, Continuous33 weeks33 weeks33 weeks
Duration of invasive ventilation63.4 hours42.9 hours48.4 hours
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants32 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants34 Participants81 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 660 / 1020 / 102
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 670 / 660 / 1020 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 674 / 660 / 1021 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Partial Pressure CO2 (pCO2) : Data From the Crossover Phase of the Study

Data from the Crossover Phase of the study: After randomization only in neonate with arterial line, the initial non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was started then blood gas was obtained after 2 hours. The participant was switched to another NIV and blood gas was obtained after 2 hours.

Time frame: 2 hours after each intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
nHFOPartial Pressure CO2 (pCO2) : Data From the Crossover Phase of the Study38.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 8.8
nSIPPVPartial Pressure CO2 (pCO2) : Data From the Crossover Phase of the Study36.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Number of Participants With Extubation Failure: Data From the Parallel Phase of the Study.

Data from the Parallel Phase of the study: The participant with and without arterial line was randomized. If The participant with arterial line was randomized to cross-over trial (randomized to NIV, then switched to another NIV for 2 hours, then switched to the first NIV \[parallel trial\]). If The participant without arterial line was randomized to parallel trial. Extubation failure will be defined by reintubation after NIV mode.

Time frame: up to 7 days after each intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
nHFONumber of Participants With Extubation Failure: Data From the Parallel Phase of the Study.5 Participants
nSIPPVNumber of Participants With Extubation Failure: Data From the Parallel Phase of the Study.4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026