Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of CET vs. SST in SMI (Serious Mental Illness)

Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive Enhancement Therapy vs. Social Skills Training in Serious Mental Illness

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04321759
Enrollment
378
Registered
2020-03-25
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2023-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia and Related Disorders

Keywords

Cognitive functioning, Social skills, Community functioning

Brief summary

To compare two evidence-based treatments, Cognitive Enhancement Therapy (CET) and Social Skills Training (SST) that have been shown in meta-analyses and in our own research to be effective to improve community functioning. The investigators will test the impact of CET and SST on community functioning, with special attention to their relative effectiveness for patients differing in baseline cognitive skills and age. The research uses a cluster design in which different mental health service centers are randomized to one of the two treatments.

Detailed description

Aim 1. We will test our hypothesis that CET will be associated with greater improvements than SST in both the primary outcome: community functioning (SAS, QLS), and the secondary outcomes of neuro- and social cognition (NIH Toolbox, PennCNB, and MSCEIT) and social skills (SSPA). For study Aim 1, we hypothesized that CET will be associated with greater improvements than SST in both the primary outcome: community functioning (SAS, QLS), and the secondary outcomes of neuro- and social cognition (selected NIH Toolbox and Penn CNB measures, and MSCEIT) and social skills (SSPA). Aim 2: We will explore differential effectiveness of the two interventions by baseline cognitive functioning and age. For Aim 2, we hypothesize that patients with less impairment in cognitive functioning at baseline will demonstrate relatively larger treatment gains in SST compared to those in CET than those who are initially more cognitively impaired, and that younger patients will benefit more from CET compared to those in SST than those who are older. The results of this study will address a key knowledge gap in the field and a decisional dilemma for clinicians. A pilot study at four treatment sites will be used to test the feasibility and acceptability of telementalhealth delivery of these two treatments, as compared to in-person delivery.

Interventions

CET's group-based exercises are delivered for 1.5 hours each week in a group of 6-8 participants led by a clinician and an assistant, for one year. During each of three modules (basic concepts, social cognition, CET applications), the groups focus on acquisition of adult social milestones in perspective-taking, social context appraisal, and other aspects of social cognition, with psychoeducational lectures, homework assignments, and in-group exercises. Weekly supervision sessions for the clinician trainers will include review of how patients respond to the different demands of computer-based training and group-based exercises and guidance about improving engagement in both.

BEHAVIORALSocial Skills Training

The psychosocial component involves weekly skills training classes delivered over one year, with modules including Communicating Effectively, Making and Keeping Friends, Making the Most of Leisure Time, Healthy Living, Using Medications Effectively, and Making the Most of a Health Care Visit (Pratt et al., 2008). Participants attend two sessions each week (normally morning and afternoon of the same day): a 90-minute session focused on a specific skill and a 60-minute session in which the specific skill is used in role-play exercises.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized cluster design with 19 service centers assigned to one of the two treatments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age 18 to 65; 2. DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective or schizophreniform disorder (confirmed via the MINI diagnostic interview); 3. estimated IQ of \> 70 (established via WTAR).

Exclusion criteria

1. the presence of a current organic brain syndrome; 2. intellectual disability (DSM-5); 3. participation in either CET or SST within the prior year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Social Adjustment Scale IIMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsMeasure of social functioning
Change in Heinrich Quality of Life ScaleMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsMeasure of social functioning
Change in Social Skills Performance AssessmentMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsMeasure of social functioning using role played scenarios

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Picture Sequence MemoryMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of visual/episodic memory & learning in NIH Toolbox
Change in Picture VocabularyMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of language in NIH Toolbox
Change in Oral Reading RecognitionMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of language in NIH Toolbox
Change in Penn Mouse Practice TestMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of speed of processing in PennCNB
Change in Auditory Verbal Learning TestMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of verbal ability in NIH Toolbox
Change in Penn Conditional Exclusion TestMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of reasoning & problem solving in PennCNB
Change in Penn Continuous Performance TestMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of reasoning & problem solving in PennCNB
Change in Managing EmotionsMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsSubscale of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT)
Change in Penn Digit Symbol TestMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of speed of processing in PennCNB
Change in List Sorting Working MemoryMeasurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsNeurocognition measure of working memory in NIH Toolbox
Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, PANSS-6Measurement at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 monthsShort form of measure of positive and negative symptoms

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJennifer Sabbagh
jsabbagh@bidmc.harvard.edu617-975-8545
Backup ContactBlanche Spindell
bspindel@bidmc.harvard.edu617-735-4261

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026