Skip to content

Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04321343
Enrollment
117
Registered
2020-03-25
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
2022-06-20
Last updated
2023-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Brief summary

This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment

Detailed description

The study will be performed in patients with NASH. The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the change in the percentage of liver fat content (assessed by MRI-PDFF).

Interventions

DRUGPXL065

PXL065 oral tablet

DRUGPlacebo oral tablet

Placebo oral tablet

Sponsors

Poxel SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients have given written informed consent * Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m² * For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m² * Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF * Qualifying liver biopsy (NAS) ≥ 4 and fibrosis score F1, F2 or F3 * Effective contraception for women of child bearing potential

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of another form of liver disease * Evidence of liver cirrhosis * Evidence of hepatic impairment * Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease * History of excessive alcohol intake * Acute cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to Randomization * Any disease which in the Investigator's opinion which in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the patient from the study * Use of non-permitted concomitant medication * Pregnancy or lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])Baseline and Week 36MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)Baseline and Week 36MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Baseline to Week 36Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Baseline to Week 36Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3Baseline and Week 36Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker. Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) ScoreBaseline and Week 36ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF \> or = 11.3: cirrhosis. Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) ScoreBaseline and Week 36Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 \< 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 \> 3.25: cirrhosis. Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age \[years\] × AST \[U/L\]) / (platelet \[10\^9/L\] × √\[ALT \[U/L\]\]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis ScoreBaseline and Week 36The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: \< -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, \> -1.455 to \< or = 0.675 for indetermined, and \> 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis. NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10\^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Baseline and Week 36Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)Baseline and Week 36MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline. The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Baseline and Week 36NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Baseline and Week 36NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)Baseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum InsulinBaseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptideBaseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)Baseline to Week 36HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)Baseline to Week 36The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG \[mg/dL\]) + log (C-peptide \[ng/mL\])). Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IRBaseline to Week 36The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in AdiponectinBaseline to Week 36Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in WeightBaseline to Week 36Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.
Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Baseline and Week 36NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Baseline and Week 36Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were screened for the study at 28 sites in the United States between 01Sep2020 and 07Sep2021.

Pre-assignment details

Following a Screening period of maximum 12 weeks, patients who have met all the applicable Inclusion criteria and none of the Exclusion criteria were to be randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
25
PXL065 15 mg QD
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
32
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
30
Placebo
Placebo oral tablets
30
Total117

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0010
Overall StudyDeath0001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2213
Overall StudyPregnancy1000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0602

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPXL065 7.5 mg QDPXL065 15 mg QDPXL065 22.5 mg QDPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants7 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants27 Participants23 Participants23 Participants92 Participants
Age, Continuous50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.28
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants8 Participants13 Participants9 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants24 Participants17 Participants21 Participants76 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
NASH CRN fibrosis score (stratification group)
F1
9 Participants11 Participants11 Participants10 Participants41 Participants
NASH CRN fibrosis score (stratification group)
F2 or F3
16 Participants21 Participants19 Participants20 Participants76 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants26 Participants29 Participants29 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants18 Participants14 Participants21 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants14 Participants16 Participants9 Participants50 Participants
T2DM status (stratification group)
Non-T2DM patients
15 Participants19 Participants18 Participants17 Participants69 Participants
T2DM status (stratification group)
T2DM patients
10 Participants13 Participants12 Participants13 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 320 / 301 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 2519 / 3219 / 3014 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 253 / 321 / 302 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)

MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)-26.555 percentage of change in LFC
PXL065 15 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)-25.353 percentage of change in LFC
PXL065 22.5 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)-24.782 percentage of change in LFC
PlaceboRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)0.937 percentage of change in LFC
p-value: 0.010595% CI: [-46.3208, -6.1313]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.029595% CI: [-40.8475, -2.1451]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.012795% CI: [-43.392, -5.1884]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])

MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])-22.900 percentage of change in LFCStandard Error 7.104
PXL065 15 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])-18.590 percentage of change in LFCStandard Error 6.904
PXL065 22.5 mg QDRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])-21.335 percentage of change in LFCStandard Error 6.446
PlaceboRelative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])2.413 percentage of change in LFCStandard Error 6.619
p-value: 0.008395% CI: [-44.1036, -6.5227]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.023795% CI: [-39.2074, -2.7991]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.008795% CI: [-41.4923, -6.0035]ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)

MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline. The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)-4.934 percentage of LFCStandard Error 1.381
PXL065 15 mg QDAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)-4.360 percentage of LFCStandard Error 1.305
PXL065 22.5 mg QDAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)-4.584 percentage of LFCStandard Error 1.207
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)-0.263 percentage of LFCStandard Error 1.228
p-value: 0.010595% CI: [-8.2463, -1.0957]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.018895% CI: [-7.514, -0.6799]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.010595% CI: [-7.6307, -1.0104]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR

The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR-36.18 IndexStandard Error 16.53
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR-17.01 IndexStandard Error 13.78
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR-41.87 IndexStandard Error 12.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR12.77 IndexStandard Error 13.03
p-value: 0.019995% CI: [-90.073, -7.817]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.11295% CI: [-66.558, 7.009]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.002695% CI: [-89.935, -19.34]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin1.532 µg/mLStandard Error 0.679
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin2.688 µg/mLStandard Error 0.646
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin4.734 µg/mLStandard Error 0.624
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin-0.143 µg/mLStandard Error 0.595
p-value: 0.063995% CI: [-0.098, 3.447]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.001495% CI: [1.1149, 4.5464]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.1982, 6.5543]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)-18.4 U/LStandard Error 6
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)-13.6 U/LStandard Error 5.9
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)-6.7 U/LStandard Error 5.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)-11.9 U/LStandard Error 5.6
p-value: 0.431895% CI: [-22.66, 9.72]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.838295% CI: [-17.37, 14.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.498295% CI: [-9.92, 20.33]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)-2.8 U/LStandard Error 2.7
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)-8.0 U/LStandard Error 2.7
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)-5.8 U/LStandard Error 2.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)3.1 U/LStandard Error 2.6
p-value: 0.116695% CI: [-13.19, 1.47]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-18.26, -3.8]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.013195% CI: [-15.79, -1.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)-10.1 U/LStandard Error 6.5
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)-10.2 U/LStandard Error 6.3
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)-4.9 U/LStandard Error 5.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)-7.2 U/LStandard Error 6
p-value: 0.744995% CI: [-20.15, 14.43]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.725595% CI: [-19.93, 13.9]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.775595% CI: [-13.89, 18.59]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score

ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF \> or = 11.3: cirrhosis. Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score-0.142 ScoreStandard Error 0.168
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score-0.206 ScoreStandard Error 0.153
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score-0.358 ScoreStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score-0.079 ScoreStandard Error 0.13
p-value: 0.767295% CI: [-0.4845, 0.3589]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.523395% CI: [-0.5216, 0.2678]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.126395% CI: [-0.6376, 0.0805]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.147 mmol/LStandard Error 0.286
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.361 mmol/LStandard Error 0.278
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.205 mmol/LStandard Error 0.251
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)0.198 mmol/LStandard Error 0.269
p-value: 0.896195% CI: [-0.8165, 0.7149]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.67195% CI: [-0.5935, 0.9204]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.984695% CI: [-0.7092, 0.7233]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score

Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 \< 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 \> 3.25: cirrhosis. Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age \[years\] × AST \[U/L\]) / (platelet \[10\^9/L\] × √\[ALT \[U/L\]\]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score-0.040 ScoreStandard Error 0.127
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score-0.107 ScoreStandard Error 0.124
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score-0.198 ScoreStandard Error 0.109
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score-0.012 ScoreStandard Error 0.11
p-value: 0.866295% CI: [-0.3559, 0.3002]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.572695% CI: [-0.4253, 0.2369]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.228995% CI: [-0.4907, 0.1192]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)-12.2 U/LStandard Error 7.6
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)-21.8 U/LStandard Error 7.5
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)-6.9 U/LStandard Error 6.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)-4.2 U/LStandard Error 7.1
p-value: 0.441395% CI: [-28.25, 12.36]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.085995% CI: [-37.63, 2.5]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.788795% CI: [-22.31, 16.97]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)0.14 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.11
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.06 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.20 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)0.21 percentage of glycated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.638495% CI: [-0.35, 0.215]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.054995% CI: [-0.547, 0.006]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-0.683, -0.142]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)-0.086 IndexStandard Error 0.134
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)-0.123 IndexStandard Error 0.127
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)-0.210 IndexStandard Error 0.106
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)0.111 IndexStandard Error 0.116
p-value: 0.260695% CI: [-0.5423, 0.1476]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.170995% CI: [-0.569, 0.1016]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.6274, -0.0148]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score

The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: \< -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, \> -1.455 to \< or = 0.675 for indetermined, and \> 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis. NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10\^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score0.170 ScoreStandard Error 0.192
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score-0.006 ScoreStandard Error 0.188
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score-0.264 ScoreStandard Error 0.167
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score0.215 ScoreStandard Error 0.167
p-value: 0.859595% CI: [-0.5509, 0.4607]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.377695% CI: [-0.7194, 0.2759]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.042495% CI: [-0.9426, 0.017]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3

Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker. Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3-2.054 ng/mLStandard Error 1.182
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3-1.753 ng/mLStandard Error 1.089
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3-2.481 ng/mLStandard Error 1.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3-1.041 ng/mLStandard Error 0.893
p-value: 0.496395% CI: [-3.9701, 1.9436]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.613195% CI: [-3.5109, 2.0866]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.293995% CI: [-4.1593, 1.2779]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG \[mg/dL\]) + log (C-peptide \[ng/mL\])). Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)0.006 IndexStandard Error 0.009
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)0.007 IndexStandard Error 0.009
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)0.012 IndexStandard Error 0.008
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)-0.005 IndexStandard Error 0.008
p-value: 0.395595% CI: [-0.0139, 0.0351]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.308195% CI: [-0.0115, 0.0362]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.137495% CI: [-0.0053, 0.0383]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide-0.205 nmol/LStandard Error 0.116
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide-0.222 nmol/LStandard Error 0.11
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide-0.250 nmol/LStandard Error 0.095
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide0.051 nmol/LStandard Error 0.102
p-value: 0.095895% CI: [-0.5577, 0.0456]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.065995% CI: [-0.5648, 0.0181]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.029795% CI: [-0.5728, -0.03]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin

Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin-78.08 pmol/LStandard Error 28.01
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin-39.76 pmol/LStandard Error 26.71
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin-56.55 pmol/LStandard Error 23.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin6.85 pmol/LStandard Error 24.06
p-value: 0.021695% CI: [-157.306, -12.558]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.193195% CI: [-116.957, 23.738]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.058195% CI: [-129.002, 2.194]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight

Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: Safety Set, defined as all as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight1.080 kgStandard Error 0.673
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight2.356 kgStandard Error 0.636
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight0.577 kgStandard Error 0.603
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight-0.103 kgStandard Error 0.623
p-value: 0.194495% CI: [-0.608, 2.9748]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.005695% CI: [0.7268, 4.1907]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.428895% CI: [-1.0111, 2.372]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder13 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder11 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder11 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder13 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder13 Participants
PlaceboImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder7 Participants
PlaceboImprovement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder16 Participants
p-value: 0.767795% CI: [0.345, 4.23]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.482895% CI: [0.434, 6.012]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.271195% CI: [0.598, 6.486]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36

Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder9 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder12 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder11 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder11 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder9 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder17 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Responder4 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder19 Participants
p-value: 0.108495% CI: [0.775, 14.152]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.056295% CI: [0.959, 17.594]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.333395% CI: [0.501, 6.948]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder7 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder14 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder15 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder7 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder4 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder22 Participants
PlaceboNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder3 Participants
PlaceboNASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder20 Participants
p-value: 0.147495% CI: [0.625, 17.208]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.26295% CI: [0.481, 14.631]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.693595% CI: [0.117, 4.133]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36

NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder13 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder14 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder18 Participants
PlaceboNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Responder7 Participants
PlaceboNASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36Non-responder16 Participants
p-value: 0.598195% CI: [0.376, 5.547]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.622895% CI: [0.363, 5.572]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.879995% CI: [0.245, 3.323]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)

Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: Subset of patients with increased baseline value from the ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Responder3 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Non-responder14 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Non-responder12 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Responder12 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Responder10 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Non-responder14 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Responder4 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)Non-responder14 Participants
p-value: 0.713795% CI: [0.131, 3.935]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.059795% CI: [0.937, 14.58]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.174995% CI: [0.655, 10.43]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)

Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: Subset of patients with increased baseline value from the ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Responder9 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Non-responder8 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Responder4 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Non-responder13 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Non-responder8 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Responder11 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Non-responder12 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)Responder4 Participants
p-value: 0.132595% CI: [0.703, 13.806]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.991895% CI: [0.201, 4.898]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.04195% CI: [1.053, 21.714]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36

Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.~For patients with missing Week 36/Early termination, multiple imputation by fully conditional specification methods was used for analysis, although the n counts and percentages reflect only the observed data.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Non-responder12 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Non-responder13 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Responder11 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Responder12 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Non-responder15 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Responder5 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36Non-responder20 Participants
p-value: 0.163495% CI: [0.677, 10.087]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.072295% CI: [0.899, 11.831]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.070395% CI: [0.909, 11.052]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Change From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP

PIIINP is the amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen. It is a fibrosis marker. Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP-2.385 µg/mLStandard Error 0.875
PXL065 15 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP-2.732 µg/mLStandard Error 0.796
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP-3.354 µg/mLStandard Error 0.674
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP-1.134 µg/mLStandard Error 0.672
p-value: 0.256495% CI: [-3.4307, 0.9295]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.122295% CI: [-3.6348, 0.4392]Regression, Linear
p-value: 0.020695% CI: [-4.088, -0.351]Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Change in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 36

Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: Safety Set, defined as all as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, Excluding Week 36 for one patient (erroneous data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss \> 10kg from Baseline to Week 36.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PXL065 7.5 mg QDChange in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 360.599 kgStandard Error 0.656
PXL065 15 mg QDChange in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 362.304 kgStandard Error 0.614
PXL065 22.5 mg QDChange in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 360.543 kgStandard Error 0.583
PlaceboChange in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 360.319 kgStandard Error 0.612
p-value: 0.753295% CI: [-1.4749, 2.0356]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.021695% CI: [0.2946, 3.6763]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.789395% CI: [-1.4283, 1.8771]Mixed Models Analysis
Post Hoc

Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36

Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score. No worsening of NASH is defined as no increase in steatosis, inflammation or ballooning

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder13 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder11 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Responder11 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Responder8 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder18 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Responder4 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36Non-responder19 Participants
p-value: 0.185495% CI: [0.628, 11.679]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.056295% CI: [0.959, 17.594]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.522395% CI: [0.398, 5.88]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Post Hoc

Improvement of at Least 2 Points in NAS

NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 36

Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASResponder9 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASNon-responder12 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASNon-responder11 Participants
PXL065 15 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASResponder11 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASResponder15 Participants
PXL065 22.5 mg QDImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASNon-responder11 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASResponder7 Participants
PlaceboImprovement of at Least 2 Points in NASNon-responder16 Participants
p-value: 0.522195% CI: [0.436, 5.201]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.482895% CI: [0.434, 6.012]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.091495% CI: [0.853, 9.636]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026