Skip to content

In-hospital Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Their Experience in Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

In-hospital Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes and Their Experience in Performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04321213
Enrollment
3639
Registered
2020-03-25
Start date
2008-12-01
Completion date
2016-12-30
Last updated
2020-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

in-hospital cardiac arrest, attitudes, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR

Brief summary

Attitudes among healthcare professionals can possibly affect the treatment given in cardiac arrest situations. The attitudes of healthcare professionals towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been poorly studied. The few existing previous international results shows attitudes reported by nurses as hesitation, fear of defibrillation, anxiety and fear of harming the patient. The aim of this study was to describe the attitudes towards performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation among in-hospital healthcare professionals, furthermore to assess if experience in performing CPR has an effect on attitudes.

Detailed description

Data will be collected using questionnaires containing attitude questions. The questionnaires contains questions regarding attitudes towards being required to perform CPR (6 questions), previous experience in performing CPR (time since last performance and number of performances) and attitudes during the latest CPR performance (8 questions). All attitude questions are constructed as multiple choice questions. Results regarding attitudes towards being required to perform CPR and attitudes during the latest CPR performance will be presented descriptively. To analyse a possible effect of time since CPR performance and number of CPR performances on attitudes during the latest CPR performance logistic regression will be used. Response variables will be yes or no on 8 specific attitude questions with predictors consisting of time since CPR performance (0-3 months ago, 4-23 months ago and \>24 months) and number of CPR performances (1-3 times, 4-10 times and \>10 times).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Region Västmanland
CollaboratorOTHER
Dalarna University
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER
Dalarna County Council, Sweden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* In-hospital healthcare professionals. * Patient contact

Exclusion criteria

* Absent during the survey * Parental leave * Leave of absence * Sick leave.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-hospital healthcare professionals' attitudes towards CPR.one month14 questions regarding attitudes towards performing CPR will be presented descriptively. Number of respondents answering yes, no and I don´t know to each attitude question will be presented.
In-hospital healthcare professionals' experience in performing CPR.one monthTwo questions regarding experience in performing CPR will be presented descriptively. Number of respondents in each response category concerning number of previous CPR performances and time since last CPR performance will be presented.
Does experience in performing CPR have an effect on attitudes towards CPRtwo monthsThe effect of previous experience in CPR on attitudes during a cardiac arrest situation will be analysed using binary logistic regression. Each of the eight questions concerning attitudes during a cardiac arrest situation will serve as a dependent variable with yes as the response. Independent variables consists of number of previous CPR performances, time since last CPR performance and workplace. Independent variables associated with the dependent variable at a level of p \<0.1 will be included in a multiple model. The model will be adjusted for profession and number of years in profession.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026