Skip to content

Dosage of Epidural Morphine in Elderly Patients

Epidural Morphine for Geriatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery: a Dose Response Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04316871
Enrollment
96
Registered
2020-03-20
Start date
2020-03-20
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Cancer, Age Problem

Keywords

Injections, Epidural, Morphine Sulfate

Brief summary

This a clinical trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of three different doses of morphine, namely 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, via the epidural route regarding reducing pain in elderly patients after a cancer surgery in the lower abdomen

Detailed description

Acute postoperative pain is a common complaint for several days after surgery. However, acute postoperative pain remains even more under controlled in elderly patients, especially those with cognitive impairment and malignancy. Geriatric population is reported to be at higher risk for unwanted side effects from analgesic treatments compared to younger patients due to different major risk factors such as: decline in organ function, polypharmacy, pharmacokinetics, drug sensitivity, and frailty. Despite of the higher risk of opioids, especially morphine, causing toxicity and adverse effect; they are still the cornerstone treatment of severe acute postoperative pain. Morphine in those patients is very likely to cause toxicity because of accumulation of its active metabolites compared to other opioids with fewer or no active metabolites. Epidural morphine is an effective route for an effective drug. Furthermore, unwanted side effects with neuraxial opioids are minor and managed easily. Regarding clinical outcomes, clinical studies showed a lot of improvements associated with postoperative opioid analgesia. Now, there is a clinical necessity to achieve the best management of acute postoperative pain in elderly patients with the least possibility of adverse side effects. We aim in this randomized, assessor blinded, clinical trial at Assuit University to determine the optimum dose of epidural morphine for the highest control of acute postoperative pain in geriatrics who are planned to have lower abdominal cancer surgery.

Interventions

DRUG1.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate

1.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

DRUGNormal saline

Normal saline will be given epidurally.

DRUG3 mg of Morphine Sulfate

3 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

DRUG4.5 mg of Morphine Sulfate

4.5 mg of Morphine Sulphate will be given epidurally.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This randomized, double blinded, clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt. The maximum total PCA morphine consumption was 12 ± 16 mg while in healthy controls was 70± 35 mg. We aim to enroll at least 60-80 participants considering the following assumptions: * Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of the difference of PCA morphine consumption between the four groups. * Main outcome variable is total PCA morphine consumption after lower abdominal cancer surgery in elderly patients receiving three different doses of epidural morphine in comparison with its consumption in healthy controls not receiving epidural morphine. * Effect size = 0.75, Alpha = 0.05, Power = 0.80 * Allocation ratio N4/N3/N2/N1 = 1/1/1/1. * 22 patients should be enrolled in each group to account for dropouts.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Men and women aged ≥ 60 years, who are planned to undergo lower abdominal cancer surgery. 2- ASA I and II classifications. 2. Surgeries via infra-umbilical abdominal incision is considered eligible.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient refusal. 2. Patients who are morbidly obese (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2). 3. Those with contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. 4- psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.72 hoursThe mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale72 hoursVisual Analog Scale is a visual chart scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 ( the worst pain ever) used by the patient to report the severity of their pain to assess the pain intensity, and all patients were instructed how to evaluate their pain and how to use the patient-controlled analgesia.
Modified Ramsay Sedation ScaleModified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperativeIt is an six-point scale informed by degree of responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimulus where awake levels were as follows: I = anxious, agitated, or restless; II = cooperative, oriented, and tranquil; III = response to command, and asleep levels were dependent on the patient's response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; IV = brisk response; V = a sluggish response; and VI = no response
Nausea Score72 hoursIt is a subjective scale to assess the nauseating side effects of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Nausea scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
Vomiting Score72 hoursIt is a subjective scale to assess the vomiting as a side effect of epidural morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Vomiting scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.
Pruritus Score72 hoursIt is a subjective scale to assess the pruritus as a side effect of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Pruritus scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.

Countries

Egypt

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at South Egypt Cancer institute and Assiut university hospitals according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Patients were recruited from the departments of surgical oncology between March 2020 and June 2021.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 102 patients were assessed for eligibility. Three of them refused to participate in the study, and three did not meet the inclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A
Participants allocated to receive 1.5 mg epidural morphine.
22
Group B
Participants allocated to receive 3 mg epidural morphine.
22
Group C
Participants allocated to receive 4.5 mg epidural morphine.
22
Group D
Participants allocated to receive 0 mg epidural morphine.
22
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2222

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup AGroup BGroup CGroup DTotal
Age, Continuous66.82 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
65.32 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.498
65.27 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.373
64.32 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.145
65.43 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.629
Body Mass Index25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.423
26.18 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.202
24.59 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.148
26.18 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.711
25.49 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.621
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Egyptian Population
22 Participants22 Participants22 Participants22 Participants88 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Egypt
22 participants22 participants22 participants22 participants88 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants16 Participants12 Participants15 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants10 Participants7 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 221 / 220 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Total Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.

The mean total PCA morphine consumption (mg) in the first 72 hr. postoperatively

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of PCA morphine consumption between the four groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group ATotal Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.27.182 mgStandard Deviation 5.6115
Group BTotal Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.9.182 mgStandard Deviation 3.5273
Group CTotal Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.6.273 mgStandard Deviation 3.4307
Group DTotal Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) Morphine Sulphate (MS) Consumption.38.136 mgStandard Deviation 4.8037
Secondary

Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale

It is an six-point scale informed by degree of responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimulus where awake levels were as follows: I = anxious, agitated, or restless; II = cooperative, oriented, and tranquil; III = response to command, and asleep levels were dependent on the patient's response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; IV = brisk response; V = a sluggish response; and VI = no response

Time frame: Modified Ramsay Sedation Scale at 2 hours postoperative

Population: Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference between the four groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AModified Ramsay Sedation Scale1.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.375
Group BModified Ramsay Sedation Scale2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.395
Group CModified Ramsay Sedation Scale3.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.375
Group DModified Ramsay Sedation Scale1.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.468
Secondary

Nausea Score

It is a subjective scale to assess the nauseating side effects of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Nausea scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group ANausea Score4.41 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.796
Group BNausea Score4.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.739
Group CNausea Score4.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.734
Group DNausea Score4.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
Secondary

Pruritus Score

It is a subjective scale to assess the pruritus as a side effect of morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Pruritus scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of between the four groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APruritus Score3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.953
Group BPruritus Score3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.086
Group CPruritus Score3.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.752
Group DPruritus Score1.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.377
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale

Visual Analog Scale is a visual chart scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 ( the worst pain ever) used by the patient to report the severity of their pain to assess the pain intensity, and all patients were instructed how to evaluate their pain and how to use the patient-controlled analgesia.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of between the four groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AVisual Analog Scale3.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Group BVisual Analog Scale2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.756
Group CVisual Analog Scale1.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.041
Group DVisual Analog Scale4.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.129
Secondary

Vomiting Score

It is a subjective scale to assess the vomiting as a side effect of epidural morphine at eight time points (0, 2, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h). The 72-hour score for this side effect was the sum of these eight scores. Vomiting scores were recorded on a scale with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 2; where: 0 was recorded if the side effect was absent; 1. if the side effect was minimal and did not require treatment; 2. if the side effect was moderate or severe and required treatment.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Main statistical test is ANOVA\\t-test to detect the difference of between the four groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AVomiting Score3.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.958
Group BVomiting Score3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.902
Group CVomiting Score3.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.122
Group DVomiting Score1.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.224

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026