Skip to content

a Single HYAJOINT Plus Combined With a Single PPR Versus a Single PRP for Knee OA

Efficacy of a Single Crosslinked Hyaluronan (HYAJOINT Plus) Combined With a Single Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Versus a Single PRP for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04315103
Enrollment
85
Registered
2020-03-19
Start date
2018-08-01
Completion date
2019-07-10
Last updated
2020-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee OA

Keywords

Hyaluronan, Knee osteoarthritis, Platelet-rich plasma

Brief summary

Intraarticular hyaluronan or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is each effective in the treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of combined hyaluronan with PRP for knee OA remained unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a single intraarticular hyaluronan (HYAJOINT Plus) combined with a single PRP versus a single intraarticular PRP in patients with knee OA.

Detailed description

Intraarticular HA or PRP has been used for knee OA for years. Combined HA and PRP has not been widely used for OA because of lack of clinical evidence. Based on in vitro and animal studies, combining HA and PRP may benefit from their dissimilar biological mechanisms for tissue repair and have potentials to synergistically promote cartilage regeneration, inhibit OA inflammation, modulate the disease process, and improve joint homeostasis in OA. Combination of HA and PRP has much potential for the treatment of OA, but the clinical evidence of this combination remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined a single crosslinked HA (HYAJOINT Plus) with a single PRP versus a single PRP alone in patients with knee OA.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTa single intraarticular injection of HYAJOINT Plus (3 ml) followed by 3 ml PRP

All the injections were done by the same experienced physician using aseptic procedures.

Sponsors

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Study blinding was accomplished by having an investigator (blinded to the randomization and treatment) perform all the assessments

Intervention model description

Patients with symptomatic knee OA were randomized to receive a single intraarticular injection of HYAJOINT Plus (3 ml) followed by 3 ml PRP (the combined-injection group) or a single injection of 3 ml PRP (the one-injection group).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 20-75 years;Symptomatic knee OA \> 6 months despite conservative treatment such as oral analgesics, NSAIDs and/or physical therapy;Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2 knee OA on radiographs taken within the previous 6 months;Average pain at walking \> 30 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS);Radiological evidence of bilateral knee OA was accepted if global pain VAS in the contralateral knee\< 30 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous orthopedic surgery on the spine or lower limbs Disabling OA of either hip or foot Knee instability, apparent joint effusion or marked valgus/varus deformity Known allergy to hyaluronan products Women ascertained or suspected pregnancy or lactating Intraarticular injections into the knee in the past 6 months Any specific medical conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, active infections, severe cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, hemiparesis, neoplasm, etc.) that would interfere with the assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS pain score change from baseline1,3 and 6 months. The patient rated the average severity of knee pain on knee movement over the previous week on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=no pain to 100=worst possible pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC, Likert Scale)1,3 and 6 monthsa 24-item questionnaire with 3 subscales measuring pain, stiffness, and physical function. Total score is 96 and higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Lequesne index1,3 and 6 monthsused to assess severity of knee symptoms during the last week. It includes the measurement of pain, walking distance, and activities of daily living. Maximal score is 24 and higher scores represent worse function.
Single-leg stance test (SLS)1,3 and 6 monthsdone by raising one foot up without touching it to the supported lower extremity with target knee and maintain balance for as long as possible. Each participant performed 3 trials, and the best result of the 3 trials was recorded.
satisfaction1,3 and 6 monthsPatients were asked to rate their treatment satisfaction compared to the preinjection condition, using a 100 mm VAS (0= completely dissatisfied, 100=completely satisfied).
consumption of analgesics1,3 and 6 monthsAcetaminophen (500mg; maximum daily dose, 4 g) was the only rescue medication allowed for knee pain. Acetaminophen was not permitted during the 24-hour period prior to each study visit. Use of rescue medication during the study period was recorded in a patient diary.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026