Skip to content

Device for Breathing Frequency Monitoring in Muscular Dystrophy

A Wearable Device for Breathing Frequency Monitoring: a Pilot Study on Patients With Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04313595
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-03-18
Start date
2018-07-29
Completion date
2019-07-15
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscular Dystrophies

Brief summary

Patients at risk of developing respiratory dysfunctions, such as patients with severe forms of muscular dystrophy, need a careful respiratory assessment, and periodic follow-up visits to monitor the progression of the disease. Continuous monitoring of respiratory activity pattern at home could give additional understandings about disease progression, flanking traditional, intermittent, cardiopulmonary evaluations, allowing prompt clinical intervention, and anticipating respiratory dysfunction. The main objective of the present study is thus to investigate the feasibility of using an innovative wearable device for respiratory monitoring, especially breathing frequency variation assessment, in patients with muscular dystrophy. The comparison between the measurements of breathing frequency obtained by using the IMU-based device and by using the reference method provided optimal results, in terms of accuracy errors, correlation and agreement. Participants positively evaluated the device for what concerns ease of use, comfort, usability and wearability. Moreover, preliminary results confirmed that breathing frequency is an interesting breathing parameter to monitor, at the clinic and at home, because it strongly correlates with the main indexes of respiratory function

Interventions

DEVICERespirHó

The system is a wearable, unobtrusive inertial-sensor-based device for long-term breathing pattern monitoring, also during daily life activities. It consists of three IMU-sensor units (3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, 3-axis magnetometer), positioned respectively on the patient's abdomen and thorax, and on a body area integral with thorax but not affected by espiratory movements. The peripheral units, placed on thorax and abdomen are used to record orientation changes during respiratory movements. The third unit is a central reference unit (hereafter CRU) that receives data from the other two units, save them on an SD card and communicate via Bluetooth with a smartphone / tablet / PC. Moreover, this unit detects only non-respiratory movement, representing not only a pure source of noise that must be removed from the thoracic and bdominal signals, but also a pure source of additional information regarding the state of ctivity of the subject .

Sponsors

IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* documented DMD or LGMD2 * loss of independent ambulation (wheelchair-bound patients) * ability to understand and follow test instructions and to report pain and discomfort.

Exclusion criteria

* presence of metal implants and cardiac pacemakers * relevant concomitant comorbidities (e.g.epilepsy) * behaviour and/or psychiatric disorders (e.g. emotional problems, anxiety, panic attacks).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of the deviceAfter 24 hours of continued useRecording of any adverse events
Usability of the device (System Usability Scale)After 24 hours of continued useSystem Usability Scale (SUS acceptance and wearability of the device):the scores range from 0 to 100 in 2.5-point increments, with higher values meaning high perceived usability of the system
Acceptability of the device (Technological Acceptance Measure)After 24 hours of continued useTechnological Acceptance Measure (TAM) questionnaire appropriate for the medical device: with higher values meaning high acceptance of the system

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy in measuring the breathing frequencyImmediately after application of the deviceComparison between the measures of respiratory rate by using the device and by using already validated instrumentation: Optoelectronic Plethysmography (OEP), optoelectronic movement analysis system. Chest wall movements during breathing are simultaneously recorded by the RespirHó device and by Optoelectronic Plethysmography (OEP), in static conditions, and in particular, in supine and seated positions. OEP allows assessment of ventilatory and breathing pattern by measuring chest-wall movements related to breathing, by using motion capture principles. Using OEP as reference method it is possible to compare the data recorded with the thoracic and abdominal units of the device RespirHó with those obtained by using OEP for the thoracic and abdominal compartments

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026