Atopic Dermatitis
Conditions
Keywords
AD
Brief summary
This study determines the Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum BSA percentage treated and evaluates safety and efficacy of 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF versus placebo (vehicle). The study has two parts: Phase I (Part 1): Approximately Twenty-five (25) subjects with various treatable Body Surface Area (BSA) involvement of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis will be enrolled in the study and treated with 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF. Phase II (Part 2): Approximately sixty (60) subjects with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with various treatable BSA involvement of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis will be randomized to be treated with 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF3 concentration or Vehicle (Placebo) in the study.
Detailed description
AMTX-100 CF3 drug product is formulated as a water-based, topical cream incorporating a 28-amino acid synthetic polypeptide (AMTX-100) as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). AMTX-100 is a chimeric, cell-penetrating, bifunctional nuclear transport modifier (NTM), that is engineered to modulate nuclear transport of transcription factors (NF-κB, NFAT, AP-1, and STAT1) involved in the activation of gene expression of key mediators of inflammation (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, MCP-1, etc.) and metabolic syndrome (ChREBP and SREBP) by importin α/β complex and importin β, respectively. This further leads to a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production and lipid and carbohydrate metabolic products. AMTX-100 CF3 is intended to improve symptoms associated with mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis in adults. This Phase I/II study aims to determine the Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum BSA percentage treated and to evaluate efficacy of 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF3 versus placebo (vehicle).
Interventions
AMTX-100 CF, topical cream with 1.1% w/w active pharmaceutical ingredient
Topical cream manufactured to mimic AMTX-100 CF3
AMTX-100 CF3, topical cream with 1.1% w/w active pharmaceutical ingredient
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Part 1 (Phase I) of the study is open-labeled. Part 2 (Phase II) of the study is double-blinded (Masking: Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, and Outcomes Assessor).
Intervention model description
Part 1 (Phase I): Part 1 of the study is an open-label, dose-escalation study to determine the MTD of AMTX-100 CF (1.1% w/w) for the highest treated percentage of the BSA affected with AD. Five (5) cohorts will be sequentially enrolled in the Part 1 of the study. Each cohort will include five (5) patients with eligible, treatable percentages of BSA affected with AD. Part 2 (Phase II): Part 2 of the study is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging study of the safety and efficacy of topically applied AMTX-100 CF3 in adult patients with Mild to Moderate AD. Sixty (60) patients will be enrolled in 2 groups of AMTX-100 CF3 along with a placebo (vehicle). The patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio with thirty (30) subjects in Group A: 1.1% of AMTX-100 CF3 and thirty (30) subjects will be randomized to Group B placebo (vehicle 0% w/w).
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Part 1 Inclusion Criteria: Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for enrollment into the Phase I (Part 1) of the study: 1. Male or female subjects who are 18 years or older 2. If female and not infertile (defined below), the subject must agree for the duration of the study to use one of the following forms of contraception 1) systemic hormonal treatment 2) an intrauterine device (IUD) which was implanted at least 2 months prior to screening or 3) double-barrier contraception (condom, diaphragm and spermicide are each considered a barrier). Females are considered to be infertile if they are either a) surgically sterile or b) have had spontaneous amenorrhea for at least the last 2 years and at least 2 years after the onset of amenorrhea while not receiving hormone replacement therapy and had a Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level greater than 40 mIU/mL and an estradiol level less than 30 pg/mL 3. All fertile female subjects as described above need to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening and baseline visits 4. Subject is capable of providing informed consent and is willing to sign the ICF prior to study Screening and agrees to comply with the study protocol requirements 5. Subject is able to apply topical products on all treatable assigned areas by self and/or caregiver (if applicable), per the Investigator 6. Subject is in general good physical/mental health per the Investigator 7. Subject's Total Body Surface Area (BSA) is between 1.5 and 2.1 m2 per the Mosteller formula 8. The subject has physician confirmed mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) defined by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hannifin and Rajka, for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment 9. Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 2 or 3 (mild to moderate) at the screening and baseline visits 10. Subject has Atopic Dermatitis (AD) involvement with eligible treatable percent of the BSA appropriate for topical treatment per the assigned cohort at the screening and baseline visits per below: 1. Cohort 1: 3% BSA ≤ AD Affected Area ≤ 6% BSA 2. Cohort 2: 6% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 12% BSA 3. Cohort 3: 12% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 24% BSA 4. Cohort 4: 24% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 48% BSA 5. Cohort 5: 48% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 70% BSA Note: Calculation of Treatable BSA percentage (% of the total BSA that is AD-involved, excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, neck, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or axillae) will be completed by the method below: o Handprint Method: the area represented by the palm with all five digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA Part 1
Exclusion criteria
Subjects are required to meet NONE of the following criteria for enrollment into the Phase I (Part 1) of the study: 1. Pregnant or lactating females or women who are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months 2. Women at postpartum for 3 months or less prior to screening 3. Serious medical illnesses such as end-stage renal disease, liver failure or heart failure that, in the opinion of the Investigator may interfere with the conduct of the study 4. Subjects with abnormal vital signs, physical and dermatological exams or clinical laboratory evaluations considered clinically significant by the Principal Investigator, which in the opinion of the PI would significantly interfere with the study conduct 5. Subjects with any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the treatment areas, as determined by the investigator 6. The subject has a planned major surgical intervention for a pre-existing condition within the duration of the study 7. The subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse that would impair or risk the subject's full participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator. 8. Participation in a clinical trial within 3 months, or more than two clinical trials within 12 months prior to screening 9. Concurrent or recent use of topical steroids, topical immunosuppressive/immunomodulative drugs, topical vitamin D3 derivative, topical retinoids, anthralin, coal tar (except when used as shampoo) or salicylic acid within 14 days of the baseline visit 10. The subject has severe AD as determined by vIGA-AD™ score higher than 3 11. The subject cannot avoid systemic treatments (including systemic corticosteroids, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy) for AD during the study per the Investigator 12. The subject has previously received any systemic treatments, immunotherapy, biologics or phototherapy for AD within 12 months prior to study enrollment 13. Current or expected use of prohibited medications as described in Section 7, unless approved by the study Medical Monitor 14. The subject has concurrent contact dermatitis or history of anaphylactic reaction Part 2 Inclusion Criteria: Subjects are required to meet ALL of the following criteria for randomization into the Phase II (Part 2) of the study: 1. Male or female subjects who are 18 years or older. 2. If female and not infertile (defined below), the subject must agree for the duration of the study to use one of the following forms of contraception 1) systemic hormonal treatment 2) an intrauterine device (IUD) which was implanted at least 2 months prior to screening or 3) double-barrier contraception (condom, diaphragm and spermicide are each considered a barrier). Females are considered to be infertile if they are either a) surgically sterile or b) have had spontaneous amenorrhea for at least the last 2 years and at least 2 years after the onset of amenorrhea while not receiving hormone replacement therapy. 3. All fertile female subjects as described above need to have a negative urine pregnancy test at the screening and baseline visits. 4. Subject is capable of providing informed consent and is willing to sign the ICF prior to study Screening and agrees to comply with the study protocol requirements. 5. Subject is able to apply topical products on all the treatable areas by self and/or caregiver (if applicable), per the Investigator. 6. Subject is willing and able to comply with all clinic visits and study-related procedures. 7. Subject is able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires. 8. The subject has physician confirmed mild to moderate Atopic Dermatitis (AD) defined by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hannifin and Rajka, for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment. 9. Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 2 or 3 (mild to moderate) at the screening and baseline visits. 10. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score lower than 23 at the screening and baseline visits 11. Subject has Atopic Dermatitis (AD) involvement of between 5% and 30% of the treatable BSA (excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or the axillae) appropriate for topical treatment at the screening and baseline visits. Note: Calculation of Treatable BSA percentage (% of the total BSA that is AD-involved, excluding the scalp, face, eyes, eyelids, hands, palms, feet, groin, genitals or the axillae) will be completed by the Rule of Nines method: o Where values of 9% or 18% of BSA are assigned to specific regions in the adult subject (head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) 12. Subjects must be applying stable doses of an additive-free, basic bland emollient twice-daily for at least 1 week immediately before the baseline visit (Visit 2, Day 0), and to be continued throughout the study. Note: The additive-free, basic bland emollients should be applied no earlier than 1 hour before or after the administration of the study treatment. Part 2
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 (Phase I) Primary: Maximum Tolerable Dose | Over the 7-day treatment period | Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) treated, by evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AMTX-100 CF (1.1% w/w concentration) based on the safety profile |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Primary: Proportion of Responder Subjects at Day 28 | Day 28 | Proportion of responder subjects at Day 28, defined as subjects with both Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (on a 5-point scale) and a reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline Note: Subjects who have received rescue treatments will be considered non-responders Note: We acknowledge that the percentage was reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD (Hanifin et al., 2001). The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Days 7, 14, 21, and 28 | The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Baseline, Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions: • For maximum itch intensity: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours? Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42 | Days 28 and 42 | The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions: • For maximum itch intensity: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours? Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Day 28 | Baseline, Day 28 | The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a 10-item, validated questionnaire to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is not at all and 3 is very much) to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QOL. For general inflammatory skin conditions, a change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered clinically important |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42 | Baseline, Days 28, and 42 | For Part 2, BSA affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the Rule of Nines method: Values of 9% or 18% of surface area are assigned to specific regions in the adult (head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\]) |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Baseline through follow-up (Day 42) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment. |
| Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | Baseline through follow-up (Day 42) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment. |
| Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | Baseline through follow-up (Day 21) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment. |
| Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (post-dose), End of Treatment (Day 7), and Follow-up (Day 21) | Tolerability of topically applied AMTX-100 CF was evaluated based on investigator-assessed application site reactions assessment. Local skin reactions were assessed in all areas treated with AMTX-100 CF and graded by the investigator on a scale of 0 to 4 based on the area with the most severe skin reaction among all treated areas. A grade of 0 represented no reaction, and a grade of 4 indicated a marked and severe skin reaction that extended beyond the treated areas. |
| Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Baseline through follow-up (Day 21) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment. |
| Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | Baseline, Day 7 | For Part 1, Body surface area (BSA) affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the handprint method: Handprint Method: the area represented by the palm with all five digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA |
| Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline, Day 7 | The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 1 Open-label AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for seven consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas of 3-6% of the BSA (3% BSA ≤ AD Affected Area ≤ 6% BSA) | 5 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 2 Open-label AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for seven consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas of 6-12% of the BSA (6% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 12% BSA) | 5 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 Open-label AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for seven consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas of 12-24% of the BSA (12% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 24% BSA) | 5 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 Open-label AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for seven consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas of 24-48% of the BSA (24% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 48% BSA) | 4 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 Open-label AMTX-100 CF 1.1% w/w, topically applied twice a day for seven consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas of 48-70% of the BSA (48% BSA \< AD Affected Area ≤ 70% BSA) | 7 |
| Part 2 Group A: 1.1% w/w AMTX-100 CF3 (1.1% w/w), topically applied twice a day for 28 consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas | 33 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo Placebo (Vehicle) (0% w/w), topically applied twice a day for 28 consecutive days to all treatable AD affected areas | 32 |
| Total | 91 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 Group A: 1.1% w/w | Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 1 | Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 2 | Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.35 years | 46.0 years | 46.1 years | 51.6 years | 41.4 years | 49.4 years | 62.8 years | 40.6 years |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.95 kilogram per meter squared | 28.9 kilogram per meter squared | 28.9 kilogram per meter squared | 26.1 kilogram per meter squared | 30.1 kilogram per meter squared | 28.6 kilogram per meter squared | 26.2 kilogram per meter squared | 23.1 kilogram per meter squared |
| BSA (m2) | 1.9 meter squared | 2.0 meter squared | 1.9 meter squared | 1.8 meter squared | 2.0 meter squared | 1.9 meter squared | 1.9 meter squared | 1.7 meter squared |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 27 Participants | 13 Participants | 10 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 64 Participants | 19 Participants | 23 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Height (cm) | 167.95 centimeter | 168.6 centimeter | 167.5 centimeter | 162.7 centimeter | 171.9 centimeter | 167.7 centimeter | 169.3 centimeter | 168.0 centimeter |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 30 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 43 Participants | 20 Participants | 13 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 49 Participants | 17 Participants | 20 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 42 Participants | 15 Participants | 13 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Weight (kg) | 78.85 Kilogram | 82.3 Kilogram | 81.2 Kilogram | 69.0 Kilogram | 88.9 Kilogram | 80.2 Kilogram | 75.4 Kilogram | 64.5 Kilogram |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 33 | 0 / 32 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 5 | 3 / 5 | 2 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 2 / 7 | 5 / 33 | 3 / 32 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 33 | 0 / 32 |
Outcome results
Part 1 (Phase I) Primary: Maximum Tolerable Dose
Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) by maximum percentage of Body Surface Area (BSA) treated, by evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AMTX-100 CF (1.1% w/w concentration) based on the safety profile
Time frame: Over the 7-day treatment period
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Primary: Maximum Tolerable Dose | 29.2 Grams of IP per application |
Part 2 (Phase II) Primary: Proportion of Responder Subjects at Day 28
Proportion of responder subjects at Day 28, defined as subjects with both Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (on a 5-point scale) and a reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline Note: Subjects who have received rescue treatments will be considered non-responders Note: We acknowledge that the percentage was reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent.
Time frame: Day 28
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Primary: Proportion of Responder Subjects at Day 28 | 3.8 Percentage of Responder Subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Primary: Proportion of Responder Subjects at Day 28 | 9.7 Percentage of Responder Subjects |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Day 28
The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a 10-item, validated questionnaire to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QOL). The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is not at all and 3 is very much) to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QOL. For general inflammatory skin conditions, a change in DLQI score of at least 4 points is considered clinically important
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Day 28 | -26.6 Percent Change from Baseline in DLQI | Standard Deviation 42.14 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Day 28 | -36.3 Percent Change from Baseline in DLQI | Standard Deviation 75.35 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD (Hanifin et al., 2001). The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -16.0 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 22.55 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -29.9 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 32.98 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -29.0 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 28.7 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -32.5 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 39.02 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -7.7 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -41.9 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 38.27 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -10.7 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 19.13 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -20.9 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 29.27 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -23.7 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 35.17 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -34.5 Percent Change from Baseline in EASI | Standard Deviation 43.29 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -6.1 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 16.66 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -14.1 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 26.54 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -11.9 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 22.16 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -16.7 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 30.31 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -2.6 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 14.73 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -26.1 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 34.93 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -5.7 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 13.79 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -11.5 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -14.1 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 22.44 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in vIGA-AD™ at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -20.4 percentage of vIGA-AD change at visits | Standard Deviation 27.79 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions: • For maximum itch intensity: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours? Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -17.1 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 40.83 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -25.8 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 47.12 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -22.8 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 43.81 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -27.6 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 45.28 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -15.1 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 28.15 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -38.4 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 27.24 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | -9.9 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 17.22 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | -8.5 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 37.26 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | -18.7 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 26.88 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -25.2 Percent Change from Baseline in NRS | Standard Deviation 36.25 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42
For Part 2, BSA affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the Rule of Nines method: Values of 9% or 18% of surface area are assigned to specific regions in the adult (head and neck \[9%\], anterior trunk \[18%\], back \[18%\], upper limbs \[18%\], lower limbs \[36%\], and genitals \[1%\])
Time frame: Baseline, Days 28, and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -27.6 Percent Change of the Treated BSA | Standard Deviation 35.72 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -32.8 Percent Change of the Treated BSA | Standard Deviation 36.03 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | -26.9 Percent Change of the Treated BSA | Standard Deviation 33.16 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | -33.7 Percent Change of the Treated BSA | Standard Deviation 36.04 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline
The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent.
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21, and 28
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 0 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 6.7 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 14.3 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 11.5 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 25.8 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 3.1 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 12.5 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 With Both vIGA-AD™ Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) on a 5-point Scale and a Reduction of ≥ 1 Point From Baseline | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 9.4 Percent of Subjects With vIGA-AD of 0/1 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent.
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 10.0 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 26.9 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 25.0 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 25.9 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 6.3 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 46.7 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 3.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 21.9 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 28.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-50, Defined as Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 45.2 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-50 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated measure to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, where a higher score indicates increased extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent.
Time frame: Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 3.3 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 7.7 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 7.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 14.8 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 3.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 20.0 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 3 (Day 7) | 3.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 4 (Day 14) | 3.1 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | Visit 5 (Day 21) | 9.4 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With EASI-75, Defined as Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI at Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 12.9 Percentage of Subjects With EASI-75 |
Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42
The Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a simple assessment tool that subjects used to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during a daily recall period. Subjects were asked the following questions: • For maximum itch intensity: On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours? Note: The weekly average of peak daily pruritus NRS was calculated by summing the daily scores for a week and dividing by the number of days with recorded scores, resulting in a range of 0 to 10. Note: We acknowledge that the percentage is reported, while the outcome measure indicates proportion. It was concluded that using percentage represents the results more apparent.
Time frame: Days 28 and 42
Population: There were missing subjects in both groups.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 18.5 Percentage of Subjects with Improved NRS |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 20.0 Percentage of Subjects with Improved NRS |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42 | End of Treatment (Day 28) | 32.3 Percentage of Subjects with Improved NRS |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: Proportion of Subjects With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS ≥ 3 From Baseline at Day 28 and 42 | Follow-Up (Day 42) | 34.5 Percentage of Subjects with Improved NRS |
Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7
The 5-point Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) is a validated measure of disease severity and success of atopic dermatitis treatments in clinical trials. The ratings (0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe) are an overall assessment of AD skin lesions, based on the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 7
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Mild | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Moderate | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Almost Clear | 3 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Moderate | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Mild | 5 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Clear | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Almost Clear | 3 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Mild | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Mild | 4 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Moderate | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Clear | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Moderate | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Mild | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Moderate | 2 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Moderate | 4 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Clear | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Almost Clear | 2 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Mild | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Mild | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Almost Clear | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Mild | 2 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Moderate | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Clear | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Moderate | 3 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Moderate | 4 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Mild | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | Baseline-Moderate | 7 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Clear | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Almost Clear | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Change From Baseline in Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) at Day 7 | End of Treatment-Mild | 2 number of subjects |
Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7
For Part 1, Body surface area (BSA) affected by AD was assessed by the investigator per calculation of treatable % BSA by the handprint method: Handprint Method: the area represented by the palm with all five digits adducted together is approximately 1% of the subject's BSA
Time frame: Baseline, Day 7
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | -46.7 percent change at the End of Treatment | Standard Deviation 30.91 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | -44.3 percent change at the End of Treatment | Standard Deviation 44.15 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | -43.3 percent change at the End of Treatment | Standard Deviation 44.62 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | -38.1 percent change at the End of Treatment | Standard Deviation 28.84 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Exploratory Outcome Measures: Percent Change From Baseline of the Treated BSA With Active AD at Day 7 | -21.7 percent change at the End of Treatment | Standard Deviation 32.31 |
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment
Tolerability of topically applied AMTX-100 CF was evaluated based on investigator-assessed application site reactions assessment. Local skin reactions were assessed in all areas treated with AMTX-100 CF and graded by the investigator on a scale of 0 to 4 based on the area with the most severe skin reaction among all treated areas. A grade of 0 represented no reaction, and a grade of 4 indicated a marked and severe skin reaction that extended beyond the treated areas.
Time frame: Baseline (post-dose), End of Treatment (Day 7), and Follow-up (Day 21)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (Post-dose) | -0.2 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.64 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Follow-Up (Day 21) | -1.0 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | End of Treatment (Day 7) | -0.8 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.64 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | End of Treatment (Day 7) | -0.6 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (Post-dose) | -0.4 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Follow-Up (Day 21) | -1.8 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | End of Treatment (Day 7) | -3.0 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 3.16 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (Post-dose) | -1.8 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Follow-Up (Day 21) | -4.4 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 3.91 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (Post-dose) | -2.0 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 2.16 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Follow-Up (Day 21) | -4.5 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 3.51 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | End of Treatment (Day 7) | -4.8 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 5.91 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | End of Treatment (Day 7) | -1.4 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Baseline (Post-dose) | -0.9 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Changes in Study Treatment Application Site Reaction Assessment | Follow-Up (Day 21) | -1.6 Units on an ordinal scale | Standard Deviation 2.37 |
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Time frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 1 number of events |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 3 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 3 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 0 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 2 number of events |
Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Time frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 21)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 3 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 4 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 0 number of subjects |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: Cohort 5 | Part 1 (Phase I) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 0 number of subjects |
Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Time frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 12 number of events |
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 2 number of events |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 3 number of events |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Related TEAE | 1 number of events |
Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that occurred or was reported by the subject to have occurred, or a worsening of a pre-existing condition. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events with onset date on or after the first treatment.
Time frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 42)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 Dose Escalation: 3% to 70% of the BSA | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 1 number of subjects |
| Part 2 Group B: Placebo | Part 2 (Phase II) Safety Outcome Measures: Incidence of Withdrawals From the Study Due to TEAEs | 1 number of subjects |