Skip to content

Translating Peer-to-Peer Support Into a Clinical Setting

Addressing Racial Disparities in Autism Diagnosis and Treatment: Translating Peer-to-Peer Support Into a Clinical Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04313283
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-03-18
Start date
2020-09-16
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2023-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism, Development Delay, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Keywords

Developmental delays, Parenting, Autism

Brief summary

There is not a lot of research focusing on Black and African American families raising young children with developmental delays. While the investigators know that early intervention helps children and their families, Black children with developmental delays are less likely to access such services. The causes for these racial disparities are largely unknown. Researchers have recommended caregiver support programming while on waitlists to improve caregiver-provider interactions and caregiver knowledge of the diagnostic process and developmental delays. Once a child is referred to a clinic for developmental concerns, long appointment waitlists contribute to further delays in timely diagnosis and treatment, as well as parental distress. Support programs for waitlisted families can begin to address these challenges. In this study, the investigators will examine a program called Parents Taking Action with families on a waitlist for a specialty developmental evaluation. The investigators will study if the program is feasible in this setting, if participants like the program, and if child and parent outcomes improve after participants have completed the program.

Detailed description

Partners at the University of Maryland Baltimore (UMB) School of Medicine (SOM), School of Social Work (SSW), and community collaborators will pilot an intervention focused on Black and African-American children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (hereafter, autism) and other developmental delays. The research fills several gaps in the academic literature. First, there is a dearth of intervention research focusing on Black families raising young children with autism. Early intervention significantly improves child and family outcomes across childhood and into adulthood. Yet, Black children with autism are less likely to access such services. Even when controlling for socioeconomic status, racial disparities in autism and developmental disability diagnoses and services persist. The causes for these socioeconomic and racial disparities are largely unknown. Researchers have recommended caregiver support programming while on waitlists to improve caregiver-provider interactions and caregiver knowledge of the diagnostic process; yet, such interventions have not been described in the literature. SSW researchers led a community-based trial to adapt a peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action, for low-income Black families raising children with autism in Baltimore. The psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention, led by trained Parent Leaders, is unique in that it considers families' cultural and socioeconomic characteristics. Our social work team worked closely with our community advisory board to make cultural adaptations to the manual for use in Baltimore with a majority Black population. Our social work team has since further adapted the program to deliver content in two six-week modules (12 weeks total). Despite the social work team's efforts to understand and address racial autism disparities, a wholly community-based model has limitations. Once a child is referred to a clinic for developmental concerns, long appointment waitlists contribute to further delays in timely diagnosis and treatment, as well as parental distress. Wait times also contribute to appointment absenteeism, which further delays timely access to care. A study suggested support programs for waitlisted families can begin to address these challenges. In total, these studies have suggested an integrated community-clinical model can provide critical supports to children and their families while on a waitlist and strengthen connections between families and clinical providers. Thus, this project will test the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term outcomes of a peer-led program, Parents Taking Action with a clinical sample.

Interventions

A peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action is the psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention led by trained Parent Leaders.

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Parent or other primary caregiver of a child age eight years or younger on University of Maryland Baltimore, Developmental-Behavioral waiting list for autism or developmental concerns * Identify self or child as Black or African American.

Exclusion criteria

* Parent or other primary caregiver is younger than 18 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parenting StressPre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeksAutism Parenting Stress Index (APSI): This measure includes 13 items that assess core autism symptoms, comorbid behaviors, and comorbid physical behaviors. Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5. Possible range is 0-65. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DepressionPre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeksCenter for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)- This measure contains 20 items assess 4 separate factors: depressive affect, somatic symptoms, positive affect, and interpersonal relations. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more considered depressed.
Family FunctioningPre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeksFamily Outcomes Survey-Revised (FOS-R): This measure was developed to provide child and family outcomes for evaluation the effectiveness of early intervention program. This measure includes 24 items assessing five outcomes (1) family needs/strengths (4 items); (2) advocacy (5 items); (3) child learning support (4 items); (4) social support (5 items); and (5) community access (6 items). Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Possible range is 24-120. Higher scores indicate better family functioning.
FidelityWeekly through intervention (12 weeks total)Procedural Fidelity Checklist Self-Assessment for Promotora Home Visits: This measurement was developed to evaluate Parent Leaders' fidelity on the program delivery. This measure includes 16 items the Parent Leader completes after every program session. Each item is based on two responses: (1) I did this; (2) I did not this. Possible range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate less fidelity.
Child BehaviorPre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeksNisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF)- This measure includes 76 item in two sections, reported separately: positive social behavior and problem behavior. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Section 1 (positive social behavior) contains 10 items and scores range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate more positive social behavior. Section 2 (problem behavior) contains 66 items and scores range from 0-198. Higher scores indicate more child behavior problems.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited participants whose child was waitlisted for an autism or developmental evaluation. 36 participants consented to participate in the single-arm study, but 17 of them did not receive the intervention because they did not complete baseline measures (n=12) or did not begin the intervention (n=5). Thus, 19 people began the intervention. Of these, 15 completed the intervention and all data points; the remaining 4 only completed part of the intervention and did not complete all data points.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Parents Taking Action
A peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action is the psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention led by trained Parent Leaders for 12 weeks. Parents Taking Action: A peer-led intervention, Parents Taking Action is the psychoeducational and child behavior management intervention led by trained Parent Leaders.
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studydid not complete intervention4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParents Taking Action
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Annual Household Income (USD)
<$10,000
5 Participants
Annual Household Income (USD)
$10,000 - $29,999
3 Participants
Annual Household Income (USD)
$30,000 - $49,999
3 Participants
Annual Household Income (USD)
$50,000 - $69,999
1 Participants
Annual Household Income (USD)
≥$70,000
1 Participants
Annual Household Income (USD)
Don't know/not sure
2 Participants
Education Level
College graduate
3 Participants
Education Level
Graduate/professional school
3 Participants
Education Level
High school graduate
9 Participants
Employment Status
Employed full-time
5 Participants
Employment Status
Employed part-time
4 Participants
Employment Status
Self-employed
4 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
2 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced
1 Participants
Marital Status
Married
5 Participants
Marital Status
Never married
8 Participants
Marital Status
Other
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Parenting Stress

Autism Parenting Stress Index (APSI): This measure includes 13 items that assess core autism symptoms, comorbid behaviors, and comorbid physical behaviors. Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5. Possible range is 0-65. Higher scores indicate more parenting stress.

Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parents Taking ActionParenting StressPre-intervention14.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Parents Taking ActionParenting StressPost-intervention12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.52
Secondary

Child Behavior

Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF)- This measure includes 76 item in two sections, reported separately: positive social behavior and problem behavior. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Section 1 (positive social behavior) contains 10 items and scores range from 0-30. Higher scores indicate more positive social behavior. Section 2 (problem behavior) contains 66 items and scores range from 0-198. Higher scores indicate more child behavior problems.

Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parents Taking ActionChild BehaviorPost-intervention (problem behavior total score)37.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Parents Taking ActionChild BehaviorPre-intervention (positive social behavior total score)11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Parents Taking ActionChild BehaviorPost-intervention (positive social behavior total score)12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Parents Taking ActionChild BehaviorPre-intervention (problem behavior total score)45.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.6
Secondary

Depression

Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)- This measure contains 20 items assess 4 separate factors: depressive affect, somatic symptoms, positive affect, and interpersonal relations. Each item is based on a 4-point rating scale with descriptors for 0, 1, 2, and 3. Possible range is 0-60. A score of 16 points or more considered depressed.

Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parents Taking ActionDepressionPre-intervention15.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Parents Taking ActionDepressionPost-intervention10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.35
Secondary

Family Functioning

Family Outcomes Survey-Revised (FOS-R): This measure was developed to provide child and family outcomes for evaluation the effectiveness of early intervention program. This measure includes 24 items assessing five outcomes (1) family needs/strengths (4 items); (2) advocacy (5 items); (3) child learning support (4 items); (4) social support (5 items); and (5) community access (6 items). Each item is based on a 5-point rating scale with descriptors for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Possible range is 24-120. Higher scores indicate better family functioning.

Time frame: Pre-intervention and post-intervention at 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parents Taking ActionFamily FunctioningPre-intervention85.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Parents Taking ActionFamily FunctioningPost-intervention99.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Secondary

Fidelity

Procedural Fidelity Checklist Self-Assessment for Promotora Home Visits: This measurement was developed to evaluate Parent Leaders' fidelity on the program delivery. This measure includes 16 items the Parent Leader completes after every program session. Each item is based on two responses: (1) I did this; (2) I did not this. Possible range is 0-100. Higher scores indicate less fidelity.

Time frame: Weekly through intervention (12 weeks total)

Population: Parent Leaders report fidelity 0-100 on each session they have with intervention participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Parents Taking ActionFidelity98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.04

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026