Skip to content

An Inflammatory Challenge Using Endotoxin

An Inflammatory Challenge Using Endotoxin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04310423
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-03-17
Start date
2021-10-19
Completion date
2023-11-14
Last updated
2025-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder, Craving, Depressed Mood, Inflammatory Response

Brief summary

The study design consists of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose endotoxin. The low dose endotoxin challenge induces a transient systemic inflammatory response with normalization of cytokine levels within hours. This phasic inflammation is distinct from chronic (tonic) levels of inflammation that may be present with AUD. A total of 38 non-treatment seeking heavy drinking men and women and 38 light drinking healthy controls will participate in the study. Recruitment will be monitored to ensure the two groups are matched by gender. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned, stratified by gender and BDI-II severity, to receive a single I.V. infusion of either low dose endotoxin (0.8 ng/kg of body weight) or placebo (same volume of 0.9% saline solution) at the UCLA Outpatient Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC). All participants will complete an alcohol cue-exposure paradigm and reward responsiveness assessment 2 hours post infusion, which is the time of expected peak cytokine response. All participants will also complete an fMRI alcohol cue-reactivity paradigm at 3 hours post infusion. Plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines \[i.e., Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF- α)\], mood, and alcohol craving, will be assessed at baseline and then hourly for four hours post infusion.

Detailed description

RECRUITMENT: Participants will be recruited from the community through online and newspaper advertisements. Campaigns in local buses and print publications (e.g., LA Weekly) will also be implemented. Targeted recruitment will also take place through a lab database of previous study participants who agreed to be contacted for future studies. TELEPHONE SCREEN: Individuals who call the lab (in response to flyers and advertisements) expressing interest in the study will receive detailed information about the study procedures, and if they remain interested they will complete a telephone screen performed by a trained research assistant for self-reported inclusion and exclusion criteria. Those who appear eligible will be invited to the laboratory for an initial in-person screening session. INITIAL SCREENING: Prior to conducting any research related procedures, research staff will conduct the informed consent process, which details the procedures to take place during the screening visit. Informed consent will be a three part process. First, participants will be asked to read and provide verbal consent for breathalyzer. If the breathalyzer is above 0.000, the visit will be stopped and the participant will not be compensated. The participant will be given an opportunity to reschedule the visit for another day. If the breathalyzer test is negative, the written informed consent form will be reviewed and signed by the participant and study staff outlining procedures for the initial screening visit. A second written consent form will be reviewed and signed in the presence of the study physician at the medical screening visit if the participant is found eligible to continue to that visit. At the initial screening visit, subjects will be asked to provide a urine sample to test for drugs of abuse and pregnancy (if female), and will complete a series of individual differences measures (described in detail below). This visit should take approximately 2 hours. Following the initial in-person screening, the study coordinator will meet with the PI to determine if the participant is eligible to continue to the medical screening based on study inclusion/exclusion criteria. MEDICAL SCREENING: Those participants who appear to be eligible after the initial screening visit, will then be scheduled for a second screening visit. This visit will be conducted by the study physician and will start with a breathalyzer test. If the breathalyzer is above 0.000, the visit will be stopped and the participant will not be compensated. The participant will be given an opportunity to reschedule the visit for another day. If the breathalyzer test is negative, the physician will conduct the second written (experimental) consent; medical history interview and physical exam. In addition, a urine drug screen test will be repeated. The participant will then be accompanied by research personnel to the CTRC for blood specimen collection including Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Complete Blood Count to evaluate overall health; and EKG to screen for medical conditions that could make study participation medically unsafe. The study physician will review each participant's medical history, vital signs, weight, review of systems, and laboratory tests, including liver function tests (LFTs), drug screen, chemistry screen, and urine pregnancy screen to determine if it is medically safe for the participant to take the study medication. Any subject who is excluded from the study will be compensated for their time in the screening session and will be offered referrals for alcohol treatment in the community. RANDOMIZATION/INFLAMMATORY CHALLENGE: Upon arrival to the CTRC, eligibility for the inflammatory challenge will be reviewed to ensure that none of the exclusion criteria have been met as described above. A nurse, who will be blind to the condition, will insert a catheter with a heparin lock into the non-dominant forearm for drug administration and hourly blood draws. Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose endotoxin (0.8 ng/kg of body weight administered) or placebo (same volume of 0.9% saline), which will be administered by the nurse as an intravenous bolus. The endotoxin will be derived from Escherichia coli (E. Coli group O:113: BB-IND 12948 to M.R.I) and will be provided by the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center as a reference endotoxin for studies of experimental inflammation in humans. Participants will complete assessments as outlined below at baseline and every hour for 4 hours post-infusion. One standard meal and one snack will be provided by the CTRC to each participant during the experimental visit. At the end of the experimental period, participants will have the catheter removed and will be discharged with instructions to abstain from consuming alcohol for 24 hours after discharge. A follow-up phone call by the study physician will be conducted the day after the inflammatory challenge and again 1-2 weeks later to assess for any adverse events. The study physician (Dr. Miotto) will be on-call and will manage any adverse events during the inflammatory challenge. She will consult with Dr. Irwin, Co-I, as needed to manage adverse events. In the event that significant medical problems are encountered, the blind will be broken and appropriate medical treatment will be provided. Individuals who meet the following stopping criteria will discontinue study-related data collection procedures (cytokine assays and cue exposure paradigm): 1. \>1 SAE at least possibly related to endotoxin administration 2. \>2 Grade 3 (severe) adverse events at least possibly related to endotoxin administration, based on the FDA Guidance Document Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials ALCOHOL CUE REACTIVITY SESSION (CR): Approximately 2 hours after receiving intravenous endotoxin (or matched placebo), participants will complete the cue-exposure paradigm. Alcohol cue exposure will follow well-established experimental procedures. Sessions will begin with a 3-minute relaxation period. Participants will then hold and smell a glass of water for 3 minutes to control for the effects of simple exposure to any potable liquid. Next, participants will hold and smell a glass of their preferred alcoholic beverage for 3 minutes. Order is not counterbalanced because of carryover effects that are known to occur. Participants (who are smokers) will be allowed a smoke break immediately prior to and immediately after the CR assessment. After every 3 minute period, participants will rate their urge to drink on the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire. REWARD RESPONSIVENESS: Approximately 2 hours after receiving intravenous endotoxin (or matched placebo), participants will complete the reward responsiveness paradigm, including the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) and Reward Responsiveness Scale (RRS). The PRT is a 25-minute task that will be administered at baseline and hour 2. The task assesses behavioral modulation as a function of reward-based reinforcement (i.e. reward seeking) by asking participants to respond to stimuli, eliciting a response bias by introducing an asymmetric reinforcer ratio. The RRS is a self-report questionnaire that measures reward responsiveness by asking subjects to rate their agreement with various statements on a 4-point Likert scale. NEUROIMAGING CUE-REACTIVITY (fMRI): Approximately 3 hours after receiving intravenous endotoxin (or matched placebo), participants will complete a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan. This scan will include an fMRI visual alcohol cue-reactivity paradigm, which will follow well-established procedures. The alcohol cues task consists of viewing visual alcohol, negative, and neutral cues, presented in six 120-s epochs (total scan duration: 12 minutes), with each epoch consisting of four 24-s blocks (one block of alcohol cues, one block of neutral cues, one block of negative images, and one block of fixation). Alcohol blocks will be specific to beverage type (beer, wine, or liquor), with two blocks of each beverage type. Prior to scanning, participants will rate their craving on a four-point scale and will also provide ratings of their craving immediately following each cue block.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Matched to endotoxin

BIOLOGICALEndotoxin

Bolus dose of 0.8 ng/kg

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The study team, medical personnel, and participants will be blind to drug condition.

Intervention model description

Randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of low dose endotoxin (0.8 ng/kg)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Be between the ages of 21 and 45 2. Be non-treatment seeking for AUD 3. Have had at least one alcoholic beverage in the last 30 days 4. FOR HEAVY DRINKERS: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) score between 8 - 15; FOR LIGHT DRINKERS: AUDIT score \< 4 5. FOR HEAVY DRINKERS: Report drinking at binge levels at least 1 time in the past month (5+ drinks/day for men, 4+ drinks/day for women); FOR LIGHT DRINKERS: report no occasions of binge drinking in the past month

Exclusion criteria

1. Have a current (last 12 months) DSM-5 diagnosis of substance use disorder for any psychoactive substances other than alcohol and nicotine 2. Have a lifetime DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or any psychotic disorder 3. Have current moderate to severe depression as indicated by a score of ≥ 21 on the Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI-II) 4. Have current suicidal ideation or lifetime history of suicide attempt as reported on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) 5. Have a positive urine screen for drugs other than cannabis; 6. Have clinically significant alcohol withdrawal symptoms as indicated by a score ≥ 8 on the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised (CIWA-R) 7. Have an intense fear of needles or have had any adverse reactions to needle puncture 8. Be pregnant, nursing, or planning to become pregnant while taking part in the study; and must agree to one of the following methods of birth control (if female), unless she or partner are surgically sterile: * Oral contraceptives * Contraceptive sponge * Patch * Double barrier * Intrauterine contraceptive device * Etonogestrel implant * Medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive injection * Complete abstinence from sexual intercourse * Hormonal vaginal contraceptive ring 9. Have a medical condition that may interfere with safe study participation (e.g., unstable cardiac, renal, or liver disease, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, autoimmune or inflammatory disease) 10. Have clinically significant abnormal EKG 11. Have \> Grade 2 laboratory abnormalities, based on FDA Guidance Document Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials 12. Have any other circumstances that, in the opinion of the investigators, compromises participant safety 13. Have non-removable ferromagnetic objects in body 14. Have claustrophobia 15. Have serious head injury or prolonged period of unconsciousness (\>30 minutes) Exclusionary Criteria for Inflammatory Challenge Visits: 1. BrAC \> 0.000 g/dl 2. clinical withdrawal (CIWA-R) score ≥ 8 3. blood pressure ≤ 90/60 or ≥ 160/120 4. resting pulse ≤ 50 beats/minute or \> 100 beats/minute 5. temperature ≥ 99.5°F 6. recent (past 2 weeks) acute illness or vaccination 7. score of 10+ on Physical Sickness Symptoms Assessment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cue-induced CravingThe cue-reactivity paradigm is conducted at baseline and at 2 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin during the experimental visit.Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) score is the primary outcome for the cue-reactivity paradigm. The AUQ is comprised of eight items rated on a 7-point Likert scale with items related to the subjective experience of alcohol craving. The minimum value is 8 and the maximum value is 56 with a higher score indicating greater subjective alcohol craving. Phasic craving for alcohol following alcohol cue exposure was assessed using the first and last items from the AUQ during an alcohol cue reactivity paradigm at baseline and at time of expected peak cytokine response (T2). This subscale of 2 items about desire to drink rated on a 7-point Likert scale provided a minimum possible value of 2 and a maximum value of 14, with higher values indicating a higher craving to drink alcohol. The investigators are primarily interested in whether low dose endotoxin increases cue-induced craving for alcohol in non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers, relative to placebo.
Change in Negative MoodThe POMS will be completed at 5 timepoints during the experimental visit. Specifically, negative mood will be assessed at baseline (prior to infusion) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is a self-report questionnaire that measures dimensions of mood. Four items from the POMS were summed to calculate the negative mood subscale. The items included discouraged, downhearted, uneasy, and anxious. Participants rated the extent that they felt items right now on a scale from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more endorsement of the items. Items were summed to calculate negative mood subscale with the score ranging from 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher negative mood. The investigators were interested in whether low dose endotoxin would increase negative mood as compared to placebo.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Reward ResponsivenessThe RRS will be completed at 2 timepoints during the experimental visit. Specifically, reward responsiveness will be assessed at baseline (prior to infusion) and 2 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.The Reward Responsiveness Scale (RRS) measures self-report reward responsiveness. The RRS scale consists of 8 items on a 4-point scale, with the sum total score of items ranging from 8-32, where higher scores indicate higher reward responsiveness. The measure was completed electronically. The investigators are interested in whether low dose endotoxin will decrease reward responsiveness as compared to placebo.
Effect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityThe fMRI scan will be completed during the experimental visit. Specifically, participants will undergo the neuroimaging scan at 3 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.The fMRI scan will include a cue-reactivity paradigm in which participants will view images of alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic beverages, negative images, and fixation cross. Participants will be asked to rate their alcohol craving before the scan and after each cue block. The investigators are interested in determining the effects of endotoxin on neural alcohol cue-reactivity. An alcohol beverage \> non-alcohol beverage contrast was specified in the first-level model for each subject, and FSL's FLAME 1 was used to conduct group-level analyses (endotoxin vs. placebo) to identify significant brain clusters in which individuals who received placebo had greater activation for alcohol beverages compared to non-alcohol beverages than those who received endotoxin. Outcome measure below indicates the voxel size of said significant clusters.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Screening procedures for participants were conducted from 2021 - 2023; therefore, given the COVID-19 pandemic, initial screening procedures were conducted via HIPAA-compliant telemedicine software. Following, participants completed a medical screening visit at the Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC) at UCLA. Following, participants completed the experimental visit at the CTRC and the UCLA Center for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCN).

Pre-assignment details

Participants completed an initial and medical screening visit for eligibility prior to the randomization assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matched to endotoxin Placebo: Matched to endotoxin
10
Endotoxin
Bolus dose of endotoxin (0.8 ng/kg) Endotoxin: Bolus dose of 0.8 ng/kg
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEndotoxinPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous30.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.53
27.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.58
29.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.01
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test13.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18
12.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.66
12.65 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.68
Beck Depression Inventory - 27.80 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
7.40 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.28
7.60 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.95
Body Mass Index27.25 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.72
24.99 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07
26.12 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97
Drinks per Drinking Day4.12 drinks/drinking day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
4.58 drinks/drinking day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95
4.35 drinks/drinking day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants10 participants20 participants
Reward Relief Habit Drinking Scale
Habit
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Reward Relief Habit Drinking Scale
Relief
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Reward Relief Habit Drinking Scale
Reward
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Symptoms4.10 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.85
4.20 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.93
4.15 symptoms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.84
Years of Education16.90 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13
16.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
16.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.28

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 109 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Negative Mood

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is a self-report questionnaire that measures dimensions of mood. Four items from the POMS were summed to calculate the negative mood subscale. The items included discouraged, downhearted, uneasy, and anxious. Participants rated the extent that they felt items right now on a scale from 0-4, with higher scores indicating more endorsement of the items. Items were summed to calculate negative mood subscale with the score ranging from 0-16, with higher scores indicating higher negative mood. The investigators were interested in whether low dose endotoxin would increase negative mood as compared to placebo.

Time frame: The POMS will be completed at 5 timepoints during the experimental visit. Specifically, negative mood will be assessed at baseline (prior to infusion) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, and 4 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.

Population: All participants were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Negative MoodOne Hour Post-Baseline0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
PlaceboChange in Negative MoodThree Hours Post-Baseline1.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
PlaceboChange in Negative MoodTwo Hours Post-Baseline0.50 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange in Negative MoodFour Hours Post-Baseline0.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboChange in Negative MoodBaseline0.60 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
EndotoxinChange in Negative MoodFour Hours Post-Baseline1.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
EndotoxinChange in Negative MoodBaseline0.80 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
EndotoxinChange in Negative MoodOne Hour Post-Baseline0.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
EndotoxinChange in Negative MoodTwo Hours Post-Baseline0.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
EndotoxinChange in Negative MoodThree Hours Post-Baseline1.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Comparison: Two-way Treatment x Time interactionp-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Cue-induced Craving

Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) score is the primary outcome for the cue-reactivity paradigm. The AUQ is comprised of eight items rated on a 7-point Likert scale with items related to the subjective experience of alcohol craving. The minimum value is 8 and the maximum value is 56 with a higher score indicating greater subjective alcohol craving. Phasic craving for alcohol following alcohol cue exposure was assessed using the first and last items from the AUQ during an alcohol cue reactivity paradigm at baseline and at time of expected peak cytokine response (T2). This subscale of 2 items about desire to drink rated on a 7-point Likert scale provided a minimum possible value of 2 and a maximum value of 14, with higher values indicating a higher craving to drink alcohol. The investigators are primarily interested in whether low dose endotoxin increases cue-induced craving for alcohol in non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers, relative to placebo.

Time frame: The cue-reactivity paradigm is conducted at baseline and at 2 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin during the experimental visit.

Population: All randomized participants included in analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboCue-induced CravingBaseline4.5004 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9622
PlaceboCue-induced CravingTwo Hours Post-Baseline4.5004 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9622
EndotoxinCue-induced CravingBaseline7.9081 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9604
EndotoxinCue-induced CravingTwo Hours Post-Baseline5.6178 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9858
Comparison: Treatment x Time interaction for alcohol cue-induced alcohol craving.p-value: 0.036Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Reward Responsiveness

The Reward Responsiveness Scale (RRS) measures self-report reward responsiveness. The RRS scale consists of 8 items on a 4-point scale, with the sum total score of items ranging from 8-32, where higher scores indicate higher reward responsiveness. The measure was completed electronically. The investigators are interested in whether low dose endotoxin will decrease reward responsiveness as compared to placebo.

Time frame: The RRS will be completed at 2 timepoints during the experimental visit. Specifically, reward responsiveness will be assessed at baseline (prior to infusion) and 2 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.

Population: All participants included in analysis; participants completed RRS at baseline and two-hours post-baseline (T2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessRRS Baseline25.60 scores on scaleStandard Error 1.11
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessRRS Two Hours Post-Baseline25.50 scores on scaleStandard Error 1.27
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessRRS Baseline26.20 scores on scaleStandard Error 0.98
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessRRS Two Hours Post-Baseline26.22 scores on scaleStandard Error 1.24
Comparison: Treatment x Time interactionsp-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Reward Responsiveness

The Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT) is a signal detection learning task that assesses reward learning from which two subscales were derived: logd is a measure of discriminability, or how difficult it is for the subjects to discriminate between the signals, while logb is a measure of response bias, or subjects' preference for the response paired with the more frequent reward. Higher logd values indicate a better ability to discriminate between reward signals (logd=1⁄2 log(Richcorrect\*Leancorrect)/(Richincorrect\*Leanincorrect)). Higher logb values indicate better reward sensitivity (logb=1⁄2 log(Richcorrect\*Leanincorrect)/(Richincorrect\*Leancorrect)). The range of possible logb and logd subscale values is between -2.48 to 2.48. The measure was completed electronically. The investigators are interested in whether low dose endotoxin will decrease reward responsiveness as compared to placebo.

Time frame: The PRT will be completed at 2 timepoints during the experimental visit. Specifically, reward responsiveness will be assessed at baseline (prior to infusion) and 2 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.

Population: All participants included in analysis; participants completed PRT at baseline and two-hours post-baseline (T2).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logb Baseline-0.07 scores on taskStandard Error 0.03
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logd Baseline1.46 scores on taskStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logb Two Hours Post-Baseline0.31 scores on taskStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logd Two Hours Post-Basleine1.98 scores on taskStandard Error 0.33
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logb Two Hours Post-Baseline0.20 scores on taskStandard Error 0.04
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logb Baseline0.16 scores on taskStandard Error 0.05
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logd Two Hours Post-Basleine1.27 scores on taskStandard Error 0.16
EndotoxinChange in Reward ResponsivenessPRT logd Baseline1.29 scores on taskStandard Error 0.16
Comparison: Treatment x Time interactionsp-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Effect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivity

The fMRI scan will include a cue-reactivity paradigm in which participants will view images of alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic beverages, negative images, and fixation cross. Participants will be asked to rate their alcohol craving before the scan and after each cue block. The investigators are interested in determining the effects of endotoxin on neural alcohol cue-reactivity. An alcohol beverage \> non-alcohol beverage contrast was specified in the first-level model for each subject, and FSL's FLAME 1 was used to conduct group-level analyses (endotoxin vs. placebo) to identify significant brain clusters in which individuals who received placebo had greater activation for alcohol beverages compared to non-alcohol beverages than those who received endotoxin. Outcome measure below indicates the voxel size of said significant clusters.

Time frame: The fMRI scan will be completed during the experimental visit. Specifically, participants will undergo the neuroimaging scan at 3 hours post-infusion of placebo or low dose endotoxin.

Population: All participants included in analysis. The outcome measure data below indicates the voxel size of significant clusters identified in which individuals who received placebo had greater activation for alcohol beverages compared to non-alcohol beverages than those who received endotoxin. Therefore, only one Arm/Group is reported, as the neuroimaging analyses used FSL software wherein the outcome is the identification of these significant clusters.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboEffect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityLeft Postcentral Gyrus Significant Cluster3190 Voxels
PlaceboEffect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityRight Thalamus Significant Cluster1942 Voxels
PlaceboEffect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityLeft Inferior Temporal Gyrus Cluster931 Voxels
PlaceboEffect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityLeft/Right Precuneus Cluster920 Voxels
PlaceboEffect on Neural Alcohol Cue-reactivityRight Precentral Gyrus518 Voxels
Comparison: Main effect of treatment on alcohol cue-elicited brain activationp-value: <0.001ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026