Skip to content

Primary Sacroiliac Fusion Versus Fusion to the Sacrum for Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine

Primary Sacroiliac Fusion Versus Fusion to the Sacrum for Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04308018
Acronym
PSEUDOLUSE
Enrollment
148
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2020-08-31
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2020-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degeneration Spine

Brief summary

To prove that the use of additional S2alar-iliac screws for pure lumbar fusions due to degenerative lumbar disease provides superior outcome compared to the standard procedure of fusion to S1.

Detailed description

Patients with symptomatic degenerative spine disease with or without spinal stenosis undergoing lumbosacral fusion to S1. Pedicle screws for posterior Instrumentation and fusion of the lumbar spine plus intervertebral fusion L5/S1 (anterior lumbar inter body fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar inter body fusion (TLIF), or posterior lumbar inter body fusion (PLIF)) with 1. Caudal end of the instrumentation at S1 2. Caudal end of the instrumentation at iliac bone via S2alar-iliac screws Stratification of both groups by: * Number of instrumented levels * Sagittal balance (Roussouly type 1+2 vs. 3+4) Prospective, randomized, controlled, rater-blinded multicentric interventional study with two parallel groups

Interventions

PROCEDURES2alar-iliac screws

Caudal end of the instrumentation at iliac bone via S2alar-iliac screws

PROCEDURES1 screws

Caudal end of the instrumentation at S1

Sponsors

Technical University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with symptomatic degenerative spine disease with or without spinal stenosis undergoing lumbosacral fusion to S1 * Lumbar or thoracolumbar Instrumentation * Planned ventral intervertebral fusion (ALIF, TLIF, PLIF) in L5/S1 * Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Scoliosis \>20° * Chronic steroid usage * Significant co-morbidity influencing the surgical success: * Osteoporosis * Rheumatoid arthritis * Mental illness/dementia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Revision rate1 year after surgeryRevisions rates between groups 1 year after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryBMRC scale 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Severe adverse events3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery(Severe adverse events) SAE due to instrumentation (new neurological deficit, infection, vascular complications, etc.)
Back pain intensity3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryBack pain intensity at the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10; high scores mean a worse outcome) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Health-related quality of life3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryHealth-related quality of life evaluated by the physical component summary (PCS) of the short-form (SF)-36 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Patient satisfaction3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryPatient satisfaction index 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Intra-group Oswestry disability index (ODI)3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryDifference in ODI 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery versus preoperatively within the same group
Revision rate II24 months after surgeryRevisions rates between groups 24 months after surgery
Inter-group Oswestry disability index (ODI)3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryDifference in Oswestry disability index (ODI) between groups 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Gluteal pain3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryGluteal pain at the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10; high scores mean a worse outcome) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery
Changes in sagittal balance1 and 2 years after surgeryChanges in sagittal balance (C7 plumb line, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis) 1 and 2 years after surgery versus preoperatively within the same group
Progressive degeneration of the adjacent segment3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryRadiological proof of progressive degeneration of the adjacent segment
Surgery durationSurgerySurgery duration
Intraoperative blood lossIntraoperativeIntraoperative blood loss
Adverse events3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryAdverse events
Sacroiliac joint syndrome3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgeryClinically apparent sacroiliac joint syndrome (Definition: Effective infiltration of local anesthetic) 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

Contacts

Primary ContactSandro Krieg, MD
sandro.krieg@tum.de8941402151
Backup ContactSebastian Ille, MD
sebastian.ille@tum.de8941402151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026