Skip to content

Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen Treatment for Incision Wounds

Evaluation of Oxygen Delivery With TransCu O2 to Study Success Rate of Surgically Closed Wounds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04307355
Enrollment
23
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Surgery, Incision Wound, Mammoplasty, Surgical Wound

Keywords

Infection, Dehiscense, Tissue infection, Surgical Revision, Scar tissue, Wound Closure

Brief summary

This is an exploratory randomized controlled trial study to test feasibility, acceptability, and proof of concept efficacy of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) adjunct therapy for decreasing healing time and reducing tissue necrosis post breast reconstruction. The investigator will assess the benefit of this novel adjunct therapy on successful closure, tissue oxygenation, scar appearance, and patients centered outcomes including perception of benefit, pain, sleep quality, and quality of life. Eligible subjects will be randomly (ratio 1:1) assigned to either intervention group (IG) or control group (CG) and will be followed for four weeks. Both groups will receive standard of care for wound treatment. IG will also receive CDO adjunct therapy using a novel dressing, which facilitates continuously supplies oxygen to the wound inside the wound dressing using a portable device named TransCu O2. The study device TransCu O2® is a Class II medical device which has US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) clearance, CE-Mark approval and a Health Canada license for the treatment of wounds. Outcomes will be assessed on weekly-basis up to 4 weeks.

Detailed description

Surgical wound complications such as infection, dehiscence, necrotic tissue, surgical revision, and poor cosmesis are unfortunately highly prevalent in patients post breast reconstruction. In particular, necrosis/ischemia post breast reconstruction because of poor blood circulation is highly prevalent and is estimated to be occurring in up to 75% of cases leading to excessive scar formation. Some factors such as active smoking or an underlying disease such as diabetes and history of radiation therapy could increase the likelihood of excessive scar and/or necrosis. In most cases surgical wounds are managed with a simple island dressing, wool padding and a light retention bandage. It could be argued that such low cost, traditional dressings are adequate for most surgical wounds. However, patients with poor tissue blood circulation often require modern wound care products that offer additional benefits, in particular among those with vascular and poor tissue oxygenation problem. Poor tissue oxygenation and poor skin perfusion could lead to surgical wound complications such as wound inflection, tissue necrosis, pain, trauma and untimely surgical revision. In particular, the presence of non-viable necrotic tissue is significant as it can be responsible for delaying healing, prolonging the inflammatory response, mechanically obstructing contraction and impeding re-epithelialisation. It also provides a focus for wound infection and surgical revision. Even after successful healing, necrotic tissue could still lead to excessive scar formation. Many of these scars can be problematic, being aesthetically unpleasant and causing discomfort. Blood supply is a significant factor in wound healing, and area of the skin with rich supply of vasculature is known to heal with finer scars. Several studies have demonstrated that mild hypoxia (lack of transcutaneous oxygen) is present in early scars, moderate hypoxia in proliferative scars, and severe hypoxia in regressive scars. Oxygen levels then return to normal in mature scars, which is consistent along with the dynamic change in microvessel density. Therefore level of transcutaneous oxygen could be a determinant factor in formation of excessive scar formation. Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) is a treatment modality that delivers pure oxygen to wounds using the same basic mechanism as breathing, namely direct diffusion into the wound from a moist surface. Because impaired blood flow results in impaired oxygen supply to incisional wounds, investigators have researched the potential of oxygen saturation, or supersaturation, to reinitiate or even accelerate wound healing. Oxygen has been shown to result in not only faster wound closure, yet also better strength of repair and higher organization of collagen, which in turn can result in lower wound recidivism and better scar appearance. In this feasibility and proof of concept study, The investigator plan to investigate the effects of oxygen on incisional wound repair and scarring after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. The investigator will use a device (TransCu O2® Oxygen Delivery System ) which continuously supplies oxygen to the wound inside the wound dressing. The device the investigator used, the TransCu O2 System, (EO2 Concepts®, San Antonio, TX) is small, wearable and silent. The system is FDA-approved and CDO therapy has been the subject of a growing body of clinical experience and scientific investigations demonstrating good results. The therapy is similar in theory to the intermittent application of oxygen through Hyperbaric Oxygen (HBO) and Topical Oxygen (TO), with a few key differences summarizing in the following: 1\) CDO provides continuous therapy, providing \ twenty-fold longer time of oxygen delivery versus intermittent therapies that are only applied 90 minutes a day. 2) CDO allows for full patient mobility during treatment, thereby reducing the risk of non-compliance and reducing overall costs The investigator have successfully used CDO therapy to reduce likelihood of tissue necrosis after surgical closure post lower extremity amputation as well as post parathyroid surgery, in which over 20 subjects were recruited and no adverse outcomes were reported. The investigator plan to extend our study to determine whether CDO therapy would show decreased healing time and better scar cosmesis early on for standardized incisional wounds such as breast reconstruction. The investigator hypothesis that using CDO will reduce the likelihood of necrotic tissue as well as severe incisional scar post-surgical closure by improving transcutaneous oxygen levels during wound healing process. The investigator will examine the validity of this hypothesis using a pilot randomized controlled trial using a convenient sample of 40 people (20 subjects per arm) after mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery.

Interventions

Breasts randomized into study active group will be provided with a Transcu O2® at their surgical site and followed for 4 weeks.

A 10 cm × 12 cm Tegaderm TM Film adhesive (3M Healthcare, Minnesota).

OTHERSilagen

A 10 cm × 12 cm silicon sheet (Silagen, New Medical Technology, Inc, Illinois).

Sponsors

Electrochemical Oxygen Concepts, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Each participant will act as their own control in this model. One of the participant's breasts will receive the intervention dressing while the other intervention breast will receive the standard of care.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-85 years of age * Ability to provide informed consent * Presence of a wound due to surgical intervention and closure * Subject or responsible caregiver is willing and able to maintain the required Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) system (if assigned to the intervention group) and applicable dressing changes

Exclusion criteria

* Active Drug/alcohol abuse (or history of drug/alcohol abuse in last 1 month) * Dementia or severely impaired cognitive function * excessive lymphedema * presence of active infection * subject has a history of or any intercurrent illnesses or conditions that would compromise the safety of the subject according to judgement of a qualified wound specialist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Size at 4 Weeks4 weeksWound size will be traced and quantified using a wound imaging system (Snapshot, Kent Imaging)
Incidence of Wound Complication at 4 Weeks4 weeksComplication is described as infection, dehiscence, and/or necrotic tissue

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of Scar Tissue4 weeksScar tissue presence will be assessed by simple view.
Change in DeoxyHB From Baseline to 4 WeeksBaseline to 4 weeksDeoxyHb at the T-Junction of each breast will be assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (Snapshot, Kent Imaging). DeoxyHb is measured as a fraction ranging from 0 to 1. The reported values below are the estimate percent change from the baseline visit to the 4th week visit.
Self-reported Pain at Week 4At 4 weeksPain will be assessed with visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 where 10 is the worst pain ever. At the final visit, patients were asked to rate their pain on this scale using the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) questionnaire. An average of this score was taken across each group.
Change in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (SatO2) From Baseline to 4 WeeksBaseline to 4 weeksSatO2 at the T-Junction of each breast will be assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (Snapshot, Kent Imaging). SatO2 is measured as a fraction ranging from 0 to 1. The reported values below are the estimate percent change from the baseline visit to the 4th week visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from Baylor College of Medicine's Plastic Surgery Department through surgeon referrals or chart reviews. Of the 23 participants who met the inclusion criteria and enrolled, 3 withdrew.

Pre-assignment details

Surgeries were performed on both breasts, with the intervention randomized to either the left or right breast, while the contralateral side served as the control. In other words, each subject acted as their own control. This resulted in data from 40 breasts across 20 participants-20 control and 20 intervention.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Direct CDO (dCDO)
One of the participant's breasts will be provided with a Transcu O2 ® Oxygen delivery system and 4x4 dressing at the surgical site for 4 weeks as supportive care. The 4x4 dressing will be attached to breast using Tegaderm adhesive.
10
Direct CDO (dCDO)
One of the participant's breasts will be provided with a Transcu O2 ® Oxygen delivery system and 4x4 dressing at the surgical site for 4 weeks as supportive care. The 4x4 dressing will be attached to breast using Tegaderm adhesive.
10
Control
One of the participant's breasts will receive a standard-of-care at the surgical site and will be followed for 4 weeks.
20
Control
One of the participant's breasts will receive a standard-of-care at the surgical site and will be followed for 4 weeks.
20
Silicone CDO (sCDO)
One of the participant's breasts will be provided with a Transcu O2 ® Oxygen delivery system and 4x4 dressing at the surgical site for 4 weeks as supportive care. The 4x4 dressing will be attached to breast using silicon sheet.
10
Silicone CDO (sCDO)
One of the participant's breasts will be provided with a Transcu O2 ® Oxygen delivery system and 4x4 dressing at the surgical site for 4 weeks as supportive care. The 4x4 dressing will be attached to breast using silicon sheet.
10
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyNon-Compliance330

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDirect CDO (dCDO)ControlSilicone CDO (sCDO)Total
Age, Continuous32.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.02
34.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
38.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
34.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
Body Mass Index (BMI)32.92 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18
34.27 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
35.61 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
34.27 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 participants18 participants9 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1 participants2 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants20 participants10 participants20 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
10 participants20 participants10 participants20 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 200 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 102 / 201 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 200 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Wound Complication at 4 Weeks

Complication is described as infection, dehiscence, and/or necrotic tissue

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Baseline participants are counted as individual breasts, with one breast treated with the intervention and the other with the standard of care. The study included 20 participants, resulting in 20 control breasts. Of the intervention breasts, 10 received dCDO and 10 received sCDO.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Direct Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (dCDO)Incidence of Wound Complication at 4 Weeks1 Breasts
ControlIncidence of Wound Complication at 4 Weeks3 Breasts
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Incidence of Wound Complication at 4 Weeks0 Breasts
Primary

Wound Size at 4 Weeks

Wound size will be traced and quantified using a wound imaging system (Snapshot, Kent Imaging)

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Baseline participants are counted as individual breasts, with one breast treated with the intervention and the other with the standard of care. The study included 20 participants, resulting in 20 control breasts. Of the intervention breasts, 10 received dCDO and 10 received sCDO.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Direct Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (dCDO)Wound Size at 4 Weeks1.5 cm^2Standard Deviation 2.83
ControlWound Size at 4 Weeks2.75 cm^2Standard Deviation 7.2
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Wound Size at 4 Weeks0.15 cm^2Standard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Change in DeoxyHB From Baseline to 4 Weeks

DeoxyHb at the T-Junction of each breast will be assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (Snapshot, Kent Imaging). DeoxyHb is measured as a fraction ranging from 0 to 1. The reported values below are the estimate percent change from the baseline visit to the 4th week visit.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Direct Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (dCDO)Change in DeoxyHB From Baseline to 4 Weeks83.89 percentage changeStandard Error 15.89
ControlChange in DeoxyHB From Baseline to 4 Weeks136.07 percentage changeStandard Error 23.28
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Change in DeoxyHB From Baseline to 4 Weeks46.53 percentage changeStandard Error 25.698
Secondary

Change in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (SatO2) From Baseline to 4 Weeks

SatO2 at the T-Junction of each breast will be assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy (Snapshot, Kent Imaging). SatO2 is measured as a fraction ranging from 0 to 1. The reported values below are the estimate percent change from the baseline visit to the 4th week visit.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

Population: Baseline participants are counted as individual breasts, with one breast treated with the intervention and the other with the standard of care. The study included 20 participants, resulting in 20 control breasts. Of the intervention breasts, 10 received dCDO and 10 received sCDO.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Direct Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (dCDO)Change in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (SatO2) From Baseline to 4 Weeks-33.57 percentage changeStandard Error 5.84
ControlChange in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (SatO2) From Baseline to 4 Weeks-23.30 percentage changeStandard Error 5.82
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Change in Tissue Oxygen Saturation (SatO2) From Baseline to 4 Weeks13.76 percentage changeStandard Error 12.12
Secondary

Presence of Scar Tissue

Scar tissue presence will be assessed by simple view.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Baseline participants are counted as individual breasts, with one breast treated with the intervention and the other with the standard of care. The study included 20 participants, resulting in 20 control breasts. Of the intervention breasts, 10 received dCDO and 10 received sCDO.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Direct Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (dCDO)Presence of Scar Tissue0 Breasts
ControlPresence of Scar Tissue0 Breasts
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Presence of Scar Tissue0 Breasts
Secondary

Self-reported Pain at Week 4

Pain will be assessed with visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 where 10 is the worst pain ever. At the final visit, patients were asked to rate their pain on this scale using the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) questionnaire. An average of this score was taken across each group.

Time frame: At 4 weeks

Population: The pain questionnaire was not asked until the sCDO group was added. Therefore, 0 samples from the dCDO group were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlSelf-reported Pain at Week 42.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Silicon Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (sCDO)Self-reported Pain at Week 43.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026