Skip to content

Study to Find the Appropriate Dose of a New Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent (GBCA) for Adults Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Known or Highly Suspected Brain and/or Spinal Cord Conditions

Multicenter, Single-blind, Adaptive Dose Finding Study of Single Intravenous Injections of BAY 1747846 With Corresponding Blinded Read in Adult Participants With Known or Highly Suspected CNS Lesions Referred for Contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04307186
Enrollment
57
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2020-11-18
Completion date
2022-09-06
Last updated
2023-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Nervous System Pathology

Keywords

CNS

Brief summary

Researchers in this study want to find the appropriate dose of drug BAY1747846 for adults undergoing MRI for known or highly suspected brain and/or spinal cord conditions so that the image quality is similar to that of drug gadobutrol for adults undergoing MRI. MRI stands for Magnetic resonance imaging which produces body pictures created by using magnetic energy rather than x-ray energy. Both BAY1747846 and gadobutrol are medicinal products known as gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) which are used in MRI examinations to provide contrast enhancement and improve imaging performance. Gadobutrol (brand name: Gadavist, Gadovist) has been approved worldwide for the diagnosis of various disorders in adult and pediatric patients. BAY1747846 is a new GBCA under development with the goal to provide similar imaging performances in MRI. Participants in this study will receive both BAY1747846 and gadobutrol with a period of 3 - 14 days in between. A MRI examination will be performed after each injection. Participant will stay in this study for 2 - 4 weeks depending on the scheduling of the visits.

Interventions

Solution for IV injection, single dose

Solution for IV injection, single dose

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is a one-way crossover study with blinded participants and blinded image readers

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. * Known or highly suspected CNS pathology (contrast-enhancing CNS lesion) referred for contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS. * Male and female. * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2.

Exclusion criteria

* Considered clinically unstable or has a concomitant/intercurrent condition (e.g. COVID-19 infection) that would not allow participation for the full planned study period (i.e. period 1, 2 or both) in the judgement of the investigator. * Severe cardiovascular disease. * Patients undergoing liver transplantation. * Any contraindication to MRI examinations. * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents, foods, chemicals or other substances. * History of allergic asthma and/ or atopic dermatitis. * Suspected lesions or suffering from any of the following CNS diseases/lesion types as the main indication for MRI: * Lepto-meningeal disease (e.g. leptomeningeal carcinomatosis). Dural lesions (e.g. meningiomas) fulfilling inclusion criteria #2 are not excluded * Pituitary adenomas (macro and micro) * Tumors of the choroid plexus * Tumors of the pineal gland * Dermoid/epidermoid tumors * Infectious disease (e.g. brain abscess, cisticercosis, etc.) * Venous angiomas * Subacute/chronic ischemia * Encephalitis * Multiple sclerosis (acute and chronic) * Optic neuritis * Chordomas * Von Hippel Lindau syndrome * Hypertensive leukoencephalopathy. * Receipt of any contrast agent \< 72 h prior to the study MRIs, or planned receipt of any contrast agent within 72 h after the second study MRI. * Planned or expected biopsy in the region of interest or any interventional therapeutic procedure from the first study MRI up to 24 h after the second study MRI. * Planned or expected change in any treatment or procedure between the two study MRIs that may alter image comparability and /or chemotherapy which is changed between the two MRI procedures. * Contraindications to the administration of gadobutrol, as specified in the local product label.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Diagnostic PreferenceAt 5 minute post each injectionOverall diagnostic preference using a matched pairs approach was evaluated by 3 blinded readers using an ordinal 5-point scale (greatly prefer gadoquatrane, prefer gadoquatrane, no preference, prefer gadobutrol, greatly prefer gadobutrol). Percentage of participants and the respective Wald confidence intervals (CI) for image preference were reported for each of the 3 readers based on the 3-point preference scale (1=greatly prefer/prefer gadoquatrane, 0=no preference, -1=greatly prefer/prefer gadobutrol). If 2 or 3 readers reach the same conclusion on the recommended action (e.g. no dose adjustment needed), then this will be the recommended action taken.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesAt 5 minute post each injectionThe 3 lesion visualization parameters (border delineation/degree of contrast enhancement/internal morphology) were combined by adding them up for each participant and each blinded reader, leading to only one variable on an ordinal 11-point scale (the higher values represent a better lesion visualization). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant. Lesion border delineation: measured on a 4-point scale (1=None \[no/unclear delineation of the lesion boundaries\] to 4=Excellent \[clear and complete delineation\]). Degree of lesion contrast enhancement: measured on a 4-point scale (1=No \[lesion is not enhanced\] to 4=Excellent \[lesion is clearly and brightly enhanced\]). Lesion internal morphology: measured on a 3-point scale (1=Poor \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is poorly visible\] to 3=Good \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is sufficiently visible\]).
Lesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAt pre-injection and 5 minute post each injectionLesion border delineation: up to 5 of the largest lesions were selected and scored using a 4-point scale (1=None \[no/unclear delineation of the lesion boundaries\] to 4=Excellent \[clear and complete delineation\]; the higher values represent a better lesion border delineation). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.
Lesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAt pre-injection and 5 minute post each injectionDegree of lesion contrast enhancement: up to the 5 largest lesions were selected and scored using a 4-point scale (1=No \[lesion is not enhanced\] to 4=Excellent \[lesion is clearly and brightly enhanced\]; the higher values represent a better degree of lesion contrast enhancement). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.
Lesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAt pre-injection and 5 minute post each injectionLesion internal morphology: up to 5 of the largest lesions were selected and scored using a 3-point scale (1=Poor \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is poorly visible\] to 3=Good \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is sufficiently visible\]; the higher values represent a better lesion internal morphology). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.
Number of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAt pre-injection and 5 minute post injectionThe 3 blinded readers recorded the total number of lesions for each pre-contrast and combined pre- and post-contrast magnetic resonance image set separately. The numbers of participants by number of detected lesions were reported.

Countries

Bulgaria, Germany, Japan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 17 study centers in 4 countries between 18-Nov-2020 (first participant first visit) and 6-Sep-2022 (last participant last visit).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 62 screened participants 5 were screening failures, resulting in 57 participants assigned to treatment who started with gadobutrol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gadobutrol + Gadoquatrane
Participants received one intravenous (IV) injection of gadobutrol 0.1 millimole(s) gadolinium/kilogram body weight (mmol Gd/kg bw) during treatment Period 1 and one IV injection of gadoquatrane (BAY1747846) 0.04 mmol Gd/kg bw during treatment Period 2.
57
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Period 1 - GadobutrolWithdrawal by Subject1
Period 2 - GadoquatraneProtocol Violation1
Washout 3-14 DaysPre-specified withdrawal criterion met1
Washout 3-14 DaysProgressive disease1
Washout 3-14 DaysWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGadobutrol + Gadoquatrane
Age, Continuous55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 572 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Diagnostic Preference

Overall diagnostic preference using a matched pairs approach was evaluated by 3 blinded readers using an ordinal 5-point scale (greatly prefer gadoquatrane, prefer gadoquatrane, no preference, prefer gadobutrol, greatly prefer gadobutrol). Percentage of participants and the respective Wald confidence intervals (CI) for image preference were reported for each of the 3 readers based on the 3-point preference scale (1=greatly prefer/prefer gadoquatrane, 0=no preference, -1=greatly prefer/prefer gadobutrol). If 2 or 3 readers reach the same conclusion on the recommended action (e.g. no dose adjustment needed), then this will be the recommended action taken.

Time frame: At 5 minute post each injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance (MR) image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 1 (1)10 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 1 (0)34 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 1 (-1)56 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 2 (1)26 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 2 (0)42 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 2 (-1)32 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 3 (1)30 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 3 (0)28 Percentage of participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneOverall Diagnostic PreferenceReader 3 (-1)42 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Reader 1p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: Reader 2p-value: 0.5775McNemar
Comparison: Reader 3p-value: 0.3173McNemar
Secondary

Lesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Images

Lesion border delineation: up to 5 of the largest lesions were selected and scored using a 4-point scale (1=None \[no/unclear delineation of the lesion boundaries\] to 4=Excellent \[clear and complete delineation\]; the higher values represent a better lesion border delineation). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.

Time frame: At pre-injection and 5 minute post each injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.83 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.701
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.509
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 31.98 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.423
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader1.82 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.438
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.45 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.589
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 33.28 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.751
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader3.02 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.614
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 13.39 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.936
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 31.87 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.403
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.469
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader1.81 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.394
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.88 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.698
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader2.91 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.609
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.39 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.576
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 13.28 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Border Delineation on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 33.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.873
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [1.06, 1.34]
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [0.94, 1.25]
Secondary

Lesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Images

Degree of lesion contrast enhancement: up to the 5 largest lesions were selected and scored using a 4-point scale (1=No \[lesion is not enhanced\] to 4=Excellent \[lesion is clearly and brightly enhanced\]; the higher values represent a better degree of lesion contrast enhancement). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.

Time frame: At pre-injection and 5 minute post each injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 31.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader1.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.629
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 33.55 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.904
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader3.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.638
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 13.24 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.917
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 30.99 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.078
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader1.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.027
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader3.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.57 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.587
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 13.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.825
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Contrast Enhancement on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 33.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.925
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [1.87, 2.28]
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [1.86, 2.25]
Secondary

Lesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Images

Lesion internal morphology: up to 5 of the largest lesions were selected and scored using a 3-point scale (1=Poor \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is poorly visible\] to 3=Good \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is sufficiently visible\]; the higher values represent a better lesion internal morphology). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant.

Time frame: At pre-injection and 5 minute post each injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.27 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.444
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.185
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 31.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.221
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader1.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.194
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.598
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 32.45 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.677
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader2.39 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.493
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 12.62 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.693
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 31.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.234
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 21.05 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.211
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader1.16 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.218
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 11.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.484
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesAverage Reader2.35 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 22.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.689
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 12.58 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.655
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastLesion Visualization Parameter Internal Morphology on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 32.44 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.673
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [1.11, 1.43]
Comparison: Average Reader95% CI: [1.05, 1.32]
Secondary

Number of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast Images

The 3 blinded readers recorded the total number of lesions for each pre-contrast and combined pre- and post-contrast magnetic resonance image set separately. The numbers of participants by number of detected lesions were reported.

Time frame: At pre-injection and 5 minute post injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=0)4 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=1)43 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=2)3 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=3)0 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=0)4 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=1)42 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=2)0 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=3)2 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=0)10 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=1)40 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=2)0 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=3)0 Participants
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=4)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=3)2 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=4)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=2)7 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=3)3 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=2)7 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=0)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=1)41 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=0)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=1)43 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=0)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=1)40 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=3)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=2)3 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=2)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=3)2 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=0)5 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=4)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=1)42 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=2)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=3)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=3)2 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=0)9 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=1)40 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=0)7 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=1)40 Participants
Gadoquatrane Pre-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=2)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=1)42 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=3)3 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=3)2 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=0)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=2)3 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=1)43 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=2)6 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 1 (Nr. of lesions=1)41 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 2 (Nr. of lesions=0)0 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=0)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=4)2 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=3)1 Participants
Gadoquatrane Combined Pre- and Post-contrastNumber of Lesions on Pre-contrast and Combined Pre- and Post-contrast ImagesReader 3 (Nr. of lesions=2)4 Participants
Secondary

Sum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast Images

The 3 lesion visualization parameters (border delineation/degree of contrast enhancement/internal morphology) were combined by adding them up for each participant and each blinded reader, leading to only one variable on an ordinal 11-point scale (the higher values represent a better lesion visualization). Average reader was the mean of the 3 blinded readers averages of the scores per participant. Lesion border delineation: measured on a 4-point scale (1=None \[no/unclear delineation of the lesion boundaries\] to 4=Excellent \[clear and complete delineation\]). Degree of lesion contrast enhancement: measured on a 4-point scale (1=No \[lesion is not enhanced\] to 4=Excellent \[lesion is clearly and brightly enhanced\]). Lesion internal morphology: measured on a 3-point scale (1=Poor \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is poorly visible\] to 3=Good \[structure and internal morphology of the lesion is sufficiently visible\]).

Time frame: At 5 minute post each injection

Population: Full analysis set (FAS): All participants who have completed magnetic resonance image datasets that qualify for blinded read.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 19.95 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.447
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 27.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.292
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 39.28 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.877
Gadobutrol + GadoquatraneSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader9.00 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.294
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesAverage reader8.94 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.229
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 19.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.541
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 39.65 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.598
Gadoquatrane Post-contrastSum of Lesion Visualization Parameters on Post-contrast ImagesReader 27.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.406
Comparison: Average readerp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.24, 0.13]t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026