Skip to content

Besponsa Post Marketing Surveillance Study

Korean Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Observe Safety and Effectiveness of BESPONSA (REGISTERED)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04307134
Enrollment
108
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2020-07-09
Completion date
2024-12-24
Last updated
2025-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Malignancy

Keywords

Refractory and relapsed B-cell ALL

Brief summary

Besponsa is approved for the treatment of R/R B-cell ALL in Korea. In accordance with the Standards for Re-examination of New Drug, it is required to conduct a PMS. Post marketing surveillance is required to determine any problems or questions associated with besponsa after marketing in Korea, with regard to the following clauses under conditions of general clinical practice. Therefore, through this study, effectiveness and safety of besponsa will be observed.

Detailed description

Before the approval of BESPONSA® in Korea, this non-interventional study is designated as a Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study and is a commitment to Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), as a part of Risk Management Plan (RMP) which is required by MFDS. The safety and effectiveness information of BESPONSA® will be gathered in the setting of routine practice in Korea during the initial 6 years after the approval.

Interventions

DRUGInotuzumab ozogamicin

R/R ALL who treated with Inotuzumab ozogamicin

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: 1. Patients diagnosed as relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). 2. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study: 1. Any patients who does not agree that Pfizer and companies working with Pfizer use his/her information. 2. Patients to whom BESPONSA® is contraindicated as per the local labeling. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Elderly Participants With ADRsFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a medicinal product in a participant who had received that product. In this outcome measure, number of elderly participants (\>=65 years) with ADRs at baseline were reported.
Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEsFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per other causality of AE to the study drug (disease under the study, other disease, concomitant treatment drug or non-drug, and others) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of age (less than \[\<\] 65 years and more than or equal to \[\>=\] 65 years) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia \[ALL\], Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve complete response (CR) at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of renal disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of hepatic disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of allergic history (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of VOD/SOS (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous systemic therapy status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous hematopoietic cell transplant status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the end of study (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to the use of concomitant medications (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event.
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs)From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.
Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEsFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AE was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all AEs were unexpected.
Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRsFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was important medical event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with unexpected ADRs and SADRs are reported. An ADR was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all ADRs were unexpected.
Number of AEs According to SeverityFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs' severity was graded using common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0; grade 1= mild AE; grade 2= moderate AE; grade 3= severe AE; grade 4= life-threatening AE and grade 5= death.
Number of AEs According to Action TakenFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per action taken for AEs (withdrawn \[temporarily or permanently or delayed\]; dose reduced; dose increased; dose not changed; unknown, and not applicable) in this outcome measure. Not applicable per protocol referred to situations if participant died or if the treatment was completed prior to the reaction/event or if drug was not administered.
Number of AEs According to SAEs' CategoryFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per SAEs category (resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect and is an important medical event) in this outcome measure. One SAE could have more than 1 outcome/characteristic and have been counted in more than one category.
Number of AEs According to Their OutcomesFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per their outcomes (recovered, recovered with sequelae, recovering, not recovered, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered medicinal product. Number of AEs per causality of AE to study drug (certain, probable/likely, possible, unlikely, conditional/unclassified, and not-assessable/unclassifiable) were reported. Certain: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on cessation of drug and pharmacological/phenomenological reaction to drug re-administration. Probable/likely: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on drug cessation. Possible: could also be explained by other drugs, lacked information/unclear information on drug discontinuation. Unlikely: not likely to have causal relationship from drug administration, could also be explained by other drugs. Conditional/unclassified: needed more data to make appropriate assessment/additional of data being reviewed. Not-assessable: lacked sufficient information/conflicting information hampering accurate causality assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of age (\<65 years and \>=65 years) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell ALL, Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of renal disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of hepatic disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of allergic history (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of VOD/SOS (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous systemic therapy (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \>1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous hematopoietic cell transplant (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyFrom first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to usage of concomitant medication (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression (PD) or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. Ineffectiveness was defined as BOR of refractory disease, PD, or relapsed disease. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) who were prescribed Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in real world setting as a routine clinical practice across South Korea were enrolled in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
Participants who were treated with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as a part of routine clinical practice were included in this observational study. No intervention was administered under this study.
107
Total107

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyEnrolled but not Treated1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInotuzumab Ozogamicin
Age, Continuous46.21 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.58
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
24 / 107
other
Total, other adverse events
97 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Number of AEs According to Action Taken

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per action taken for AEs (withdrawn \[temporarily or permanently or delayed\]; dose reduced; dose increased; dose not changed; unknown, and not applicable) in this outcome measure. Not applicable per protocol referred to situations if participant died or if the treatment was completed prior to the reaction/event or if drug was not administered.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenNot applicable477 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenDose not changed319 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenUnknown0 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenWithdrawn (temporarily or permanently or delayed)46 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenDose reduced3 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Action TakenDose increased0 Adverse Events
Primary

Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per SAEs category (resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect and is an important medical event) in this outcome measure. One SAE could have more than 1 outcome/characteristic and have been counted in more than one category.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any SAE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of SAEs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity1 Serious Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that resulted in death27 Serious Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that were life-threatening9 Serious Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization45 Serious Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect0 Serious Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SAEs' CategorySAEs that were considered as an important medical event0 Serious Adverse Events
Primary

Number of AEs According to Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs' severity was graded using common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0; grade 1= mild AE; grade 2= moderate AE; grade 3= severe AE; grade 4= life-threatening AE and grade 5= death.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SeverityGrade 1 AEs252 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SeverityGrade 2 AEs339 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SeverityGrade 3 AEs179 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SeverityGrade 4 AEs48 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to SeverityGrade 5 AEs27 Adverse Events
Primary

Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per their outcomes (recovered, recovered with sequelae, recovering, not recovered, and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Their OutcomesRecovered593 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Their OutcomesRecovered with sequelae0 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Their OutcomesRecovering91 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Their OutcomesNot recovered153 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs According to Their OutcomesUnknown8 Adverse Events
Primary

Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered medicinal product. Number of AEs per causality of AE to study drug (certain, probable/likely, possible, unlikely, conditional/unclassified, and not-assessable/unclassifiable) were reported. Certain: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on cessation of drug and pharmacological/phenomenological reaction to drug re-administration. Probable/likely: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on drug cessation. Possible: could also be explained by other drugs, lacked information/unclear information on drug discontinuation. Unlikely: not likely to have causal relationship from drug administration, could also be explained by other drugs. Conditional/unclassified: needed more data to make appropriate assessment/additional of data being reviewed. Not-assessable: lacked sufficient information/conflicting information hampering accurate causality assessment.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugCertain10 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugProbable/likely13 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugPossible135 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugUnlikely686 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugConditional/unclassified1 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study DrugNot-assessable/unclassifiable0 Adverse Events
Primary

Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per other causality of AE to the study drug (disease under the study, other disease, concomitant treatment drug or non-drug, and others) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies number of AEs evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEsDisease under the study442 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEsOther disease19 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEsConcomitant treatment drug or non-drug119 Adverse Events
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEsOthers106 Adverse Events
Primary

Number of Elderly Participants With ADRs

An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a medicinal product in a participant who had received that product. In this outcome measure, number of elderly participants (\>=65 years) with ADRs at baseline were reported.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who were \>=65 years with any AEs.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Elderly Participants With ADRs10 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs)

An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs)Participants with ADRs53 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs)Participants with SADRs4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants with AEs99 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants with SAEs34 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of age (less than \[\<\] 65 years and more than or equal to \[\>=\] 65 years) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at BaselineParticipants With AEs who Aged <65 years at Baseline82 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at BaselineParticipants With AEs who aged >=65 years at Baseline17 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of allergic history (yes or no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for Allergic history at Baseline50 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for Allergic history at Baseline49 Participants
p-value: =0.950995% CI: [0.01, 999.99]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia \[ALL\], Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL, and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Philadelphia (+) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline32 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Philadelphia (-) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline67 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Unknown Diagnosis at Baseline0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve complete response (CR) at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Second Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline28 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Refractory Disease Status at Baseline9 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had First Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline54 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Third or More Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline8 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of hepatic disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for Hepatic Disorder at Baseline20 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for Hepatic Disorder at Baseline79 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous hematopoietic cell transplant status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline53 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline46 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Unknown for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous systemic therapy status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline99 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline0 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Unknown for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of renal disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for Renal Disorder at Baseline7 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for Renal Disorder at Baseline92 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at BaselineParticipants With AEs who were Female39 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at BaselineParticipants With AEs who were Male60 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at Baseline

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of VOD/SOS (yes or no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had Yes for VOD/SOS status at Baseline0 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at BaselineParticipants With AEs who had No for VOD/SOS status at Baseline99 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to the use of concomitant medications (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the end of study (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyParticipants with AEs who took Concomitant Medication99 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyParticipants with AEs who did not take Concomitant Medication0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRs

An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was important medical event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with unexpected ADRs and SADRs are reported. An ADR was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all ADRs were unexpected.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRsParticipants with unexpected ADRs15 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRsParticipants with unexpected SADRs1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEs

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AE was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all AEs were unexpected.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEsParticipants with unexpected AEs85 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEsParticipants with unexpected SAEs24 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)

BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression (PD) or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. Ineffectiveness was defined as BOR of refractory disease, PD, or relapsed disease. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)Effective74 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)Ineffective20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at Baseline

BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who were Female32 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who were Male42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at Baseline

BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of age (\<65 years and \>=65 years) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at BaselineParticipants with Effective BOR who Aged <65 years at Baseline59 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at BaselineParticipants with Effective BOR who Aged >=65 years at Baseline15 Participants
Comparison: Statistical data for this outcome measure is combined for all age groups in accordance with local regulations.p-value: =0.148895% CI: [0.99, 1.07]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of allergic history (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Allergic History as Yes at Baseline32 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Allergic History as No at Baseline42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline

BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell ALL, Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Philadelphia (+) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline22 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Philadelphia (-) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline52 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Unknown Diagnosis at Baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Refractory Disease Status at Baseline8 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had First Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline40 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Second Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline21 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Third or More Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of hepatic disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Hepatic Disorder as Yes at Baseline17 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Hepatic Disorder as No at Baseline57 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \>1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous hematopoietic cell transplant (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant as Yes at Baseline36 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant as No at Baseline38 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Unknown at Baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous systemic therapy (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as Yes at Baseline74 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as No at Baseline0 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as Unknown at Baseline0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of renal disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Renal Disorder as Yes at Baseline4 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had Renal Disorder as No at Baseline70 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at Baseline

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of VOD/SOS (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had VOD/SOS Status as Yes at Baseline0 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at BaselineParticipants With Effective BOR who had VOD/SOS Status as No at Baseline74 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study

BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to usage of concomitant medication (yes and no) in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)

Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyParticipants With Effective BOR who Took Concomitant Medication74 Participants
Inotuzumab OzogamicinNumber of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the StudyParticipants With Effective BOR who did not Take Concomitant Medication0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026