Hematologic Malignancy
Conditions
Keywords
Refractory and relapsed B-cell ALL
Brief summary
Besponsa is approved for the treatment of R/R B-cell ALL in Korea. In accordance with the Standards for Re-examination of New Drug, it is required to conduct a PMS. Post marketing surveillance is required to determine any problems or questions associated with besponsa after marketing in Korea, with regard to the following clauses under conditions of general clinical practice. Therefore, through this study, effectiveness and safety of besponsa will be observed.
Detailed description
Before the approval of BESPONSA® in Korea, this non-interventional study is designated as a Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study and is a commitment to Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), as a part of Risk Management Plan (RMP) which is required by MFDS. The safety and effectiveness information of BESPONSA® will be gathered in the setting of routine practice in Korea during the initial 6 years after the approval.
Interventions
R/R ALL who treated with Inotuzumab ozogamicin
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: 1. Patients diagnosed as relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). 2. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Exclusion criteria
Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study: 1. Any patients who does not agree that Pfizer and companies working with Pfizer use his/her information. 2. Patients to whom BESPONSA® is contraindicated as per the local labeling. \-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Elderly Participants With ADRs | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a medicinal product in a participant who had received that product. In this outcome measure, number of elderly participants (\>=65 years) with ADRs at baseline were reported. |
| Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per other causality of AE to the study drug (disease under the study, other disease, concomitant treatment drug or non-drug, and others) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of age (less than \[\<\] 65 years and more than or equal to \[\>=\] 65 years) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia \[ALL\], Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL, and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve complete response (CR) at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of renal disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of hepatic disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of allergic history (yes or no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of VOD/SOS (yes or no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous systemic therapy status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous hematopoietic cell transplant status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the end of study (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to the use of concomitant medications (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs) | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event. |
| Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEs | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AE was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all AEs were unexpected. |
| Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRs | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was important medical event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with unexpected ADRs and SADRs are reported. An ADR was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all ADRs were unexpected. |
| Number of AEs According to Severity | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs' severity was graded using common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0; grade 1= mild AE; grade 2= moderate AE; grade 3= severe AE; grade 4= life-threatening AE and grade 5= death. |
| Number of AEs According to Action Taken | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per action taken for AEs (withdrawn \[temporarily or permanently or delayed\]; dose reduced; dose increased; dose not changed; unknown, and not applicable) in this outcome measure. Not applicable per protocol referred to situations if participant died or if the treatment was completed prior to the reaction/event or if drug was not administered. |
| Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per SAEs category (resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect and is an important medical event) in this outcome measure. One SAE could have more than 1 outcome/characteristic and have been counted in more than one category. |
| Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per their outcomes (recovered, recovered with sequelae, recovering, not recovered, and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered medicinal product. Number of AEs per causality of AE to study drug (certain, probable/likely, possible, unlikely, conditional/unclassified, and not-assessable/unclassifiable) were reported. Certain: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on cessation of drug and pharmacological/phenomenological reaction to drug re-administration. Probable/likely: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on drug cessation. Possible: could also be explained by other drugs, lacked information/unclear information on drug discontinuation. Unlikely: not likely to have causal relationship from drug administration, could also be explained by other drugs. Conditional/unclassified: needed more data to make appropriate assessment/additional of data being reviewed. Not-assessable: lacked sufficient information/conflicting information hampering accurate causality assessment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of age (\<65 years and \>=65 years) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell ALL, Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of renal disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of hepatic disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of allergic history (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of VOD/SOS (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous systemic therapy (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \>1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous hematopoietic cell transplant (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to usage of concomitant medication (yes and no) in this outcome measure. |
| Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) | From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days) | BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression (PD) or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. Ineffectiveness was defined as BOR of refractory disease, PD, or relapsed disease. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. |
Countries
South Korea
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) who were prescribed Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in real world setting as a routine clinical practice across South Korea were enrolled in this study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Participants who were treated with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin as a part of routine clinical practice were included in this observational study. No intervention was administered under this study. | 107 |
| Total | 107 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 21 |
| Overall Study | Enrolled but not Treated | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46.21 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.58 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 42 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 65 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 24 / 107 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 97 / 107 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 34 / 107 |
Outcome results
Number of AEs According to Action Taken
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per action taken for AEs (withdrawn \[temporarily or permanently or delayed\]; dose reduced; dose increased; dose not changed; unknown, and not applicable) in this outcome measure. Not applicable per protocol referred to situations if participant died or if the treatment was completed prior to the reaction/event or if drug was not administered.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Not applicable | 477 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Dose not changed | 319 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Unknown | 0 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Withdrawn (temporarily or permanently or delayed) | 46 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Dose reduced | 3 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Action Taken | Dose increased | 0 Adverse Events |
Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per SAEs category (resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect and is an important medical event) in this outcome measure. One SAE could have more than 1 outcome/characteristic and have been counted in more than one category.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any SAE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of SAEs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity | 1 Serious Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that resulted in death | 27 Serious Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that were life-threatening | 9 Serious Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization | 45 Serious Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect | 0 Serious Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to SAEs' Category | SAEs that were considered as an important medical event | 0 Serious Adverse Events |
Number of AEs According to Severity
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs' severity was graded using common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0; grade 1= mild AE; grade 2= moderate AE; grade 3= severe AE; grade 4= life-threatening AE and grade 5= death.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Severity | Grade 1 AEs | 252 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Severity | Grade 2 AEs | 339 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Severity | Grade 3 AEs | 179 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Severity | Grade 4 AEs | 48 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Severity | Grade 5 AEs | 27 Adverse Events |
Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per their outcomes (recovered, recovered with sequelae, recovering, not recovered, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | Recovered | 593 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | Recovered with sequelae | 0 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | Recovering | 91 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | Not recovered | 153 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs According to Their Outcomes | Unknown | 8 Adverse Events |
Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered medicinal product. Number of AEs per causality of AE to study drug (certain, probable/likely, possible, unlikely, conditional/unclassified, and not-assessable/unclassifiable) were reported. Certain: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on cessation of drug and pharmacological/phenomenological reaction to drug re-administration. Probable/likely: couldn't be explained by other drugs, had clinically reasonable reaction on drug cessation. Possible: could also be explained by other drugs, lacked information/unclear information on drug discontinuation. Unlikely: not likely to have causal relationship from drug administration, could also be explained by other drugs. Conditional/unclassified: needed more data to make appropriate assessment/additional of data being reviewed. Not-assessable: lacked sufficient information/conflicting information hampering accurate causality assessment.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies evaluable number of AEs.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Certain | 10 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Probable/likely | 13 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Possible | 135 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Unlikely | 686 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Conditional/unclassified | 1 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Causality of AEs to the Study Drug | Not-assessable/unclassifiable | 0 Adverse Events |
Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of AEs were classified as per other causality of AE to the study drug (disease under the study, other disease, concomitant treatment drug or non-drug, and others) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE and Overall Number of Units Analyzed signifies number of AEs evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs | Disease under the study | 442 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs | Other disease | 19 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs | Concomitant treatment drug or non-drug | 119 Adverse Events |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of AEs Based on Other Causality of AEs | Others | 106 Adverse Events |
Number of Elderly Participants With ADRs
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a medicinal product in a participant who had received that product. In this outcome measure, number of elderly participants (\>=65 years) with ADRs at baseline were reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who were \>=65 years with any AEs.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Elderly Participants With ADRs | 10 Participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs)
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs) | Participants with ADRs | 53 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) and Serious ADRs (SADRs) | Participants with SADRs | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with AEs | 99 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Participants with SAEs | 34 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of age (less than \[\<\] 65 years and more than or equal to \[\>=\] 65 years) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | Participants With AEs who Aged <65 years at Baseline | 82 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | Participants With AEs who aged >=65 years at Baseline | 17 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of allergic history (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for Allergic history at Baseline | 50 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Allergic History Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for Allergic history at Baseline | 49 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia \[ALL\], Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Philadelphia (+) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline | 32 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Philadelphia (-) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline | 67 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Unknown Diagnosis at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve complete response (CR) at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Second Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 28 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Refractory Disease Status at Baseline | 9 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had First Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 54 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Third or More Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of hepatic disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for Hepatic Disorder at Baseline | 20 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for Hepatic Disorder at Baseline | 79 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous hematopoietic cell transplant status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline | 53 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline | 46 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Unknown for Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of previous systemic therapy status (yes, no, and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline | 99 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Unknown for Previous Systemic Therapy at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of renal disorder status (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for Renal Disorder at Baseline | 7 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Renal Disorder Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for Renal Disorder at Baseline | 92 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at Baseline | Participants With AEs who were Female | 39 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Sex at Baseline | Participants With AEs who were Male | 60 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at Baseline
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristics of VOD/SOS (yes or no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had Yes for VOD/SOS status at Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Their Veno-occlusive Liver Disease/ Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (VOD /SOS) Status at Baseline | Participants With AEs who had No for VOD/SOS status at Baseline | 99 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. Number of participants with AEs were classified according to the use of concomitant medications (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the end of study (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure who had any AE.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | Participants with AEs who took Concomitant Medication | 99 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With AEs Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | Participants with AEs who did not take Concomitant Medication | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRs
An ADR was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to medicinal product in participant who had received that product. SADR was an ADR that resulted in any of the following: death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was important medical event. In this outcome measure, number of participants with unexpected ADRs and SADRs are reported. An ADR was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all ADRs were unexpected.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRs | Participants with unexpected ADRs | 15 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Unexpected ADRs and SADRs | Participants with unexpected SADRs | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEs
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product. The event need not necessarily had a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product at any dose that: resulted in death; is life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AE was considered expected if the reported event and its specificity or severity were consistent with as pre-specified in the protocol, other than these all AEs were unexpected.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to 28 days post last dose of study intervention (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The safety analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated with safety-related outcome measures at least once.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEs | Participants with unexpected AEs | 85 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Unexpected AEs and SAEs | Participants with unexpected SAEs | 24 Participants |
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)
BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression (PD) or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. Ineffectiveness was defined as BOR of refractory disease, PD, or relapsed disease. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) | Effective | 74 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) | Ineffective | 20 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at Baseline
BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of sex (female and male) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who were Female | 32 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Sex at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who were Male | 42 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at Baseline
BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of age (\<65 years and \>=65 years) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | Participants with Effective BOR who Aged <65 years at Baseline | 59 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Age at Baseline | Participants with Effective BOR who Aged >=65 years at Baseline | 15 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of allergic history (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Allergic History as Yes at Baseline | 32 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Allergic History at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Allergic History as No at Baseline | 42 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline
BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of diagnosis (Philadelphia \[+\] B-cell ALL, Philadelphia \[-\] B-cell ALL and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Philadelphia (+) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline | 22 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Philadelphia (-) B-cell ALL Diagnosis at Baseline | 52 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Diagnosis at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Unknown Diagnosis at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. Refractory Disease: failure to achieve CR at the end of induction. Relapsed disease: Reappearance of blasts in the blood or bone marrow (\>5%) or in any extramedullary site after a CR. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of disease status (refractory, first relapsed, second relapsed and third or more relapsed) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Refractory Disease Status at Baseline | 8 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had First Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 40 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Second Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 21 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Disease Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Third or More Relapsed Disease Status at Baseline | 5 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of hepatic disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Hepatic Disorder as Yes at Baseline | 17 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Hepatic Disorder at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Hepatic Disorder as No at Baseline | 57 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \>1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous hematopoietic cell transplant (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant as Yes at Baseline | 36 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant as No at Baseline | 38 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Unknown at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of previous systemic therapy (yes, no and unknown) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as Yes at Baseline | 74 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as No at Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Previous Systemic Therapy Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Previous Systemic Therapy as Unknown at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of renal disorder (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Renal Disorder as Yes at Baseline | 4 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their Renal Disorder at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had Renal Disorder as No at Baseline | 70 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at Baseline
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. VOD also known as SOS is a potentially life-threatening condition in which the small veins in the liver are blocked. This obstruction impairs blood flow through the liver and can lead to liver damage and failure. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to their baseline demographic characteristic of VOD/SOS (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had VOD/SOS Status as Yes at Baseline | 0 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Their VOD/SOS Status at Baseline | Participants With Effective BOR who had VOD/SOS Status as No at Baseline | 74 Participants |
Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study
BOR: best response recorded from start of treatment until PD or recurrence. Effectiveness was defined as a BOR of CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. PD: Increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of circulating or bone marrow blasts or development of extramedullary disease. CR: No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, trilineage hematopoiesis and \< 5% blasts, ANC \> 1000/microliter, platelets \>100000/microliter and no recurrence for 4 weeks. CR with incomplete hematologic recovery: met all criteria for CR except platelet count and/or ANC. The number of participants with effective BOR were classified according to usage of concomitant medication (yes and no) in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until disease progression or recurrence (maximum up to 311 days)
Population: The effectiveness analysis set included participants who have been administered Inotuzumab Ozogamicin at least once and evaluated based upon effectiveness outcome measures. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure with effective BOR.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | Participants With Effective BOR who Took Concomitant Medication | 74 Participants |
| Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Number of Participants With Effective BOR Classified According to Usage of Concomitant Medication Throughout the Study | Participants With Effective BOR who did not Take Concomitant Medication | 0 Participants |