Skip to content

Evaluation of HIFU in TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER and OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY

EVALUATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) IN CURATIVE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER AT LOW OR INTERMEDIATE RISK AND IN TREATMENT OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY (FORFAIT INNOVATION ART L165-1-1 Social Security Code)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04307056
Acronym
HIFI
Enrollment
3862
Registered
2020-03-13
Start date
2015-03-23
Completion date
2022-08-24
Last updated
2023-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer, Ultrasound Therapy

Keywords

HIFU

Brief summary

to compare the efficacy of HIFU treatment with standard treatment in two situations: 1. as first-line cancer treatment, HIFU is compared to radical prostatectomy. 2. for patients with recurrence after external beam radiotherapy, HIFU treatment is compared to radical prostatectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadical Prostatectomy

The surgical approach can be open or laparoscopic. The procedure begins with lymph node dissection for the intermediate risk groups (PSA \> 10 ng/mL and/or presence of grade 4 Gleason score). Total prostatectomy includes removal of the seminal vesicles. It can preserve 1 or 2 neurovascular bundles, depending on the cancer stage and/or the choice expressed by the patient. The vesicourethral suture is either a running or interrupted suture, and there is drainage by a bladder catheter for at least 5 days.

PROCEDUREHigh Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment

The treatment with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) evaluated in this study will be delivered by 2 types of medical devices currently available on the market, Ablatherm® and Focal One®. They are both computer-controlled and provided with an endo-rectal probe with integrated ultrasound, enabling planning and the monitoring of treatment of localized prostate cancer in realtime.

Sponsors

Association Francaise d'Urologie
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General inclusion criteria * Patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate classified as T1-2, N0, Nx M0 * classified as low or intermediate risk * Patient with PSA \< 15 ng/ml, Gleason score ≤ 7 restricted to the form \[3 + 4\]. * Biopsy with at least 12 specimens and a maximum of four out of six invaded sextants * Patient with a pelvic MRI if there is an intermediate risk and a bone scintigraphy if PSA \> 10 ng/ml * Patient affiliated with health insurance or beneficiary of an equivalent plan Inclusion criteria for the HIFU Arm * Patients 70 years of age or older * Patients with a life expectancy related to age and associated illness estimated to be greater than 5 years Inclusion Criteria for Total Prostatectomy Arm • Patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 years and a state of health allowing general anaesthesia. NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA * Patient participating in other biomedical research within 3 months prior to their inclusion in this protocol * Included patient simultaneously participating in another research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence-free survival30 monthsThe main objective for patients is to compare recurrence-free survival (i.e., the rate of salvage therapy by external beam radiotherapy and/or hormone therapy) in patients treated by HIFU and those treated by radical prostatectomy. The implementation of salvage therapy will be decided according to several non-exclusive criteria (positivity of margins (for patients with radical prostatectomy), PSA at 3 months, biologic recurrence (increase in PSA \> 0.2 ng/ml after radical surgery, \> Nadir +2 after HIFU), control biopsies positive, the appearance of metastases

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
immediate or late complications3 months after treatmentclinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
urinary functionDay 0, Inclusionmeasured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
sexual fonctionDay 0, InclusionSexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Immediate or late complications6 weeks after treatmentclinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
The rate of patients in biochemical failure6 weeks after treatmentThe rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage: * PSA \> 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery * PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
The rate of local recurrence3 months after treatmentThe rate of local recurrence is measured by control biopsy (number of positive biopsies)
Survival without metastases6 months after treatmentdemonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Evaluation of quality of lifeDay 0, InclusionQuality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)

Countries

France, Guadeloupe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026