Skip to content

Clinical Trial ROBERT® - Project Active Training

Clinical Trial ROBERT® - Project Active Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04304976
Enrollment
8
Registered
2020-03-12
Start date
2019-11-27
Completion date
2020-04-21
Last updated
2021-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apoplexy; Stroke, Safety, Spinal Cord Injuries, Usability

Brief summary

The overall purpose with this clinical trial is to, monitor and secure ROBERT®'s clinical performance and safety in a clinical environment in the regional hospital North Denmark, Neuro Unit North. The purpose of the study is to investigate if ROBERT® has the ability to 1. Perform guided active training. 2. Perform resistance based active training. And validate the safety of ROBERT® in a clinical environment.

Interventions

DEVICEROBERT®

Robotic Rehabilitation intervention ROBERT®, designed for early, and supplementary therapy of patients.

Sponsors

Lifescience-Robotics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalised patients at Neuro Unit North, during the trial period. * 18 years or older. * Can read, understand and speak Danish * Reduced motor function in lower extremities.

Exclusion criteria

* No able to sign informed consent. * Cannot read, understand or speak Danish * Patients with unstable fractures in columna, pelvis or lower extremities. * Patients with the risk of ulcers, or with exceedingly sensitive skin. * The patient is refusing to train with ROBERT®

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Active training and assistive training capabilities (3 active and 3 passive motions): evaluated as passed/not passedUp to 19 weeks1. Active training capabilities will be assessed, 3 active motions are planned (the therapist has to be active) by the therapist, and manually performed by hand. The resistance perceived by the therapist is then compared to the expert opinion of the therapist to evaluate if this correlates with, small, medium, and large resistance. This is evaluated as passed/not passed for all 3 motions 2. Active assistive training capabilities will be assessed: 3 passive motions are planned (the robot moves, the therapist follows movement), by the therapist and the robot starts performing the motions, the therapist performs a small, moderate and large assistive movement in conjunction with the robot. The results in % of activity in the path of motion are displayed, and the therapist evaluates if this is in agreement with what they would categorise as a small, moderate and large assistive movement respectively. This is evaluated as passed/not passed for all 3 motions.
Safety, Capture adverse events.Up to 19 weeksSafety is evaluated during patient use, nr of treatment-related adverse events is recorded during training sessions.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026